Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Misata Studio: verified synthetic data

REMOTE · API.MISATA.STUDIO

Hosted: plan and build multi-table test and demo data, export 25 formats, with checks shown.

0 this week 25 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 10% of remote servers

Unreachable for 1 day in a row. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Testing and QA

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security11
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → unreachable ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but we couldn't connect to verify it. security
  • 27 Oct 26 +2
    • HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
  • 24 Oct 26 −2
    • HSTS header: pass → fail ▼ security
  • 23 Oct 26 −53
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.70 → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “export_dataset” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “generate_dataset” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “validate_blueprint” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 300 → 506 ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: excellent → good functional
    • New tool “check_answers” functional
  • 19 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.misata.studio/mcp

TLS unreached
DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.misata.studio. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
studio. present 1354 8 Verified
misata.studio. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.misata.studio/mcp Unreachable
http (plaintext) http://api.misata.studio/mcp HTTPS enforced
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~3,260 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
blueprint_guide ~202

The reference for the engine's full design language (the `blueprint` argument of generate_dataset, start_generation and validate_blueprint): roles, distributions, formulas that read parent columns and draw noise, per-group sequences (seq, lag, cumsum, ar1 drift, random walk), aggregates, event windows, cause-and-effect, lifecycles, with patterns, and an index of chapters. Read it before writing a blueprint. Args: topic: a chapter's id from the index (or several, comma-separated) for that chapter in full, with a world that builds as written: JSON payloads (webhooks, audit trails), threads of messages, one party's duplicate records, running balances, rosters made from demand, a source system's raw drops and schema changes, planted problems for an eval. Empty for the reference.

NameTypeReqDescription
topicstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

cancel_generation ~34

Stop a running start_generation job. It stops at the next stage boundary and keeps nothing.

NameTypeReqDescription
job_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_answers ~441

The dataset's ground truth: every number it is held to, and the business's standard numbers (MRR, churn, billed revenue, win rate...), by month, worked out when it was made. Use it to test whatever answers questions about the data -- an agent, a dashboard, a cube, a text-to-SQL model -- and to say exactly why a wrong answer is wrong. Call it four ways: 1. dataset_id alone: the key's numbers (`kpis`: id, title, unit, months) and `questions` to ask, drawn from the key ("What is MRR at each month's end for 2025-07?"), each with an id. Their answers are not shown. 2. answers={question_id: number}: each answer graded within its tolerance; a wrong one is named as the usual misreading it equals (voided invoices counted, churn over every account), when it is one. 3. values with kpi: numbers computed anywhere (ClickHouse, a semantic layer, a BI tile), as one number, a {"2025-07": 123.4, ...} series by month, or [[month, value], ...]. Says whether they are that KPI (a tile is read as its latest month, the year to date, ...), and what they are instead when not. 4. sql (and kpi): a query over this dataset's own tables (DuckDB, as query_dataset), run here; a wrong one is told which KPI it computes, or the one change after which it returns the key. The values are plain numbers, so an answer from any engine is checked the same way; export_dataset(format="demo", dialect="clickhouse") hands over the same data and key to load into ClickHouse.

NameTypeReqDescription
answers–––
dataset_idstringyes–
kpi–––
questionsinteger––
seedinteger––
sql–––
values–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

export_dataset ~436

Export a generated dataset as a file. Returns a `download_url` the person can open (or you can fetch, e.g. with curl) for as long as the dataset is held, about 2 hours. Give the person the link rather than pasting file contents into the chat. Args: dataset_id: from a prior generate_dataset call. format: data: csv, parquet, jsonl, json, avro, xlsx, feather, orc, sqlite, duckdb, sql. code and docs: dbt, notebook, dictionary, dbml, mermaid, prisma, sqlalchemy, typescript, jsonschema, expectations, django, openapi, mockapi. `sql` is schema.sql (DDL with keys) + data.sql (COPY/INSERT) — the way to seed a real database: run the returned SQL through your own database connection, since this server never holds a database credential itself. `demo` is the handover for a demo or an eval: the database with a one-step loader, the ER diagram, answer_key.json (every number by month), questions.jsonl and the proof of each request. dialect: for `sql`: postgres, mysql, sqlite, mssql, oracle, bigquery, snowflake, clickhouse (MergeTree tables; above 500k rows, typed Parquet with load.sql). For `demo`: postgres (psql) or clickhouse (Parquet loaded with clickhouse-client). inline: also return the file itself as `base64` (only for files under a few MB). Use it when you must write the file yourself and cannot fetch a URL. Returns: filename, content_type, bytes, download_url, expires_at (unix seconds), and `base64` when `inline` and small enough.

NameTypeReqDescription
dataset_idstringyes–
dialectstring––
formatstring––
inlineboolean––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_ready_dataset ~220

The ready-made datasets Misata publishes: free sample databases (direct download, public domain) and premium datasets with a full answer key (a free preview, then a one-off price). Check this first when someone wants sample, demo, practice or teaching data for a common scenario (retail, e-commerce, SaaS, manufacturing SPC, predictive maintenance, insurance claims, fraud/AML, clinical, network security): handing over a dataset that already exists is instant. If none fits their tables, generate one instead. Args: query: what the person needs, in their words. Only orders the list (closest first); every dataset is still returned, so judge the fit yourself from the tables and summary. Returns: datasets: [{slug, kind (free|premium), title, summary, rows, tables, page_url, and download_url (free) or free_preview_url + buy_url + price_usd (premium)}].

NameTypeReqDescription
querystring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_dataset ~979

Make a verified relational dataset and wait for it: every foreign key checked, dates correctly ordered, declared aggregates and rates exact, before anything is returned. Deterministic for a seed. Use this when you give a `schema` or `ddl` (seconds). For a plain-English `request` the engine designs the tables with a model, which can take several minutes: call start_generation instead and poll get_status, so the call does not sit open and time out. Args: request: Plain-English description (needs an LLM key unless `schema`/`ddl` is also given). With no key, design it yourself instead: blueprint_guide, then `blueprint` below. schema: A Misata schema dict for exact structural control. No key needed for structure. Its `numbers` (revenue by month, churn, MRR, shares, averages) are held exactly: see the server instructions. A column's `moves_with` ({"column": "customers.income", "strength": 0.6}) pairs it with another number of its row or its parent's, by rank, each keeping its own values. ddl: CREATE TABLE statements. No key needed for structure. Beside it, schema={"numbers": [...], "window": {...}} holds the story's numbers on these tables. seed: Reproducibility seed — the same request/schema and seed always produce the same rows. research: Ground realistic numbers (prices, growth rates) in real published facts via a web search. Off by default (an anonymous caller's request should not trigger external calls unless asked for); needs a key regardless of `schema`/`ddl`. blueprint: The engine's full design language (blueprint_guide has the reference): readings around a parent's nominal, drift, autocorrelation, cause-and-effect, event windows, exact aggregates. Use it whenever the data must behave like the real process. No key need…

NameTypeReqDescription
blueprint–––
ddl–––
requeststring––
researchboolean––
schema–––
seedinteger––
story–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_certificate ~79

The full certificate for a dataset made by generate_dataset: every claim (stated vs actual), every requirement's status and evidence, realism findings, planted defects/anomalies if any, and the pattern charts. This is the whole answer key, not the trimmed form generate_dataset returns.

NameTypeReqDescription
dataset_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_status ~62

Where a start_generation job is. While running: the stage it is in and how long it has run. When done: the same answer generate_dataset returns (dataset_id, verification, tables, certificate).

NameTypeReqDescription
job_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

plan_dataset ~279

See the tables, sizes and relationships the engine would build, before any rows exist. Free (no rows are made), so it is worth calling before generate_dataset on anything non-trivial: review what it understood and assumed, then adjust your request or schema before spending a real call. Args: request: Plain-English description (needs an LLM key, unless `schema`/`ddl` is also given — then it is still used to ground realism, e.g. locale and what columns mean). schema: A Misata schema dict (see the server instructions for the format). No key needed for structure. ddl: CREATE TABLE statements. No key needed for structure. Returns: route: "chat" (not a dataset request — see `reply`), "design" (the model designed the tables) or "pack" (matched a built-in shape). tables: name, estimated rows, columns, foreign keys for each table the engine would build. understanding: what the engine read the request as (business, archetype, assumptions). requirements: every specific thing the request asked for, so you can see what was understood.

NameTypeReqDescription
ddl–––
requeststring––
schema–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

query_dataset ~160

Read-only SQL over a dataset's own tables (one SELECT/WITH statement; every table name is a view over that dataset's own files — nothing else on the server is reachable this way). Args: dataset_id: from a prior generate_dataset call. sql: a single SELECT (or WITH ... SELECT) statement. No semicolons, file paths, or statements that write or read outside the dataset (checked before running). limit: rows returned (capped at 5000). Returns: columns, rows, truncated (whether more rows existed than `limit`).

NameTypeReqDescription
dataset_idstringyes–
limitinteger––
sqlstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

start_generation ~141

Start a generation in the background and return a job_id at once. Use it for any plain-English `request` (a model designs the tables, which takes minutes) — then call get_status(job_id) every 20-30 seconds until it says done. Arguments are the same as generate_dataset. Returns: job_id, status "running". get_status gives the stage and, when finished, the dataset.

NameTypeReqDescription
blueprint–––
ddl–––
requeststring––
researchboolean––
schema–––
seedinteger––
story–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

validate_blueprint ~180

Check a blueprint before generating it: every error said as what to change, the design traps it falls into (a column that will round away, a copy of a value not made yet, a window that counts nothing), its size against your row cap, and a small preview run (a few thousand rows) with the verifier's findings and sample rows, so you can see the data behave before the real call. Free. Returns: valid, errors (fix these), warnings (read these), planned (sizes the stated numbers set; "keep_size" on a table keeps its row_count), estimated_rows, row_cap, preview: {passed, findings, tables: {name: first rows}} when `preview`.

NameTypeReqDescription
blueprintobjectyes–
previewboolean––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

whoami ~47

Which account this connection is, and what it may do: signed in with a Studio MCP key or anonymous, the row cap, and whether a model key is available for plain-English requests.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Misata Studio: verified synthetic data MCP server?

Misata Studio: verified synthetic data is a hosted endpoint at https://api.misata.studio/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.misata.studio

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http studio-misata-misata 'https://api.misata.studio/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Misata Studio: verified synthetic data MCP server?

Misata Studio: verified synthetic data is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as studio.misata/misata. Hosted: plan and build multi-table test and demo data, export 25 formats, with checks shown. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.misata.studio/mcp).

Is the Misata Studio: verified synthetic data MCP server safe to use?

Misata Studio: verified synthetic data scores 25 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Misata Studio: verified synthetic data MCP server expose?

Misata Studio: verified synthetic data exposes 13 tools: whoami, plan_dataset, blueprint_guide, validate_blueprint, generate_dataset, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,260 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Misata Studio: verified synthetic data MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for Misata Studio: verified synthetic data. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the Misata Studio: verified synthetic data MCP server still maintained?

Misata Studio: verified synthetic data is still listed in the MCP registry, though our most recent checks did not reach this channel. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.