io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp
MCPB · STILLOS-RATINGS-MCP.MCPB
Check an MCP server before you install it — outside-in trust ratings for 7,000+ operators.
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 91% of MCPB servers
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security13
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 30 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability83
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 337 tokens (~112/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 30 Oct 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 −1
- Maintenance: pass → unverified ▼ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp/releases/download/v1.0.0/stillos-ratings-mcp.mcpb
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_mcp_server ~187
Before installing or trusting an MCP server, check it. Returns an outside-in trust rating for that host from a public census of 7,000+ MCP operators refreshed every 6 hours: percentile grade, rank, five scored dimensions, whether it advertises a machine-payable rail, how many other servers its publisher mass-published and whether it shares a boilerplate tool set with a template fleet, and — critically — any DATED finding that its advertised tool set changed while the version string it serves did not. An unrated host is reported as NOT_RATED with an explicit warning that unobserved is not attested safe. Nothing here is self-reported by the operator and every figure is independently recomputable.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| host | string | yes | Hostname, endpoint URL, or registry name — e.g. api.mcp.ai, https://api.mcp.ai/mcp |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_mcp_servers ~77
Compare up to 10 candidate MCP servers side by side on rating, rank, rail position and open findings — for choosing between alternatives that do the same job. A host we failed to look up is reported as a lookup failure, never as a clean result.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| hosts | array | yes | Hostnames to compare (max 10) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_tool_surface_findings ~73
List every MCP operator currently carrying a dated tool-surface finding — a case where the advertised tool set grew while the served version string stayed identical, meaning clients that pinned that version were never asked to re-approve what it now exposes. Includes when each was first observed and a link to free redacted evidence.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp server?
io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, 6f048f6a2db6faa962f78aaa7eb87a6c56ded9d33c0fd97ae7fde5bbd3342c9d; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.
mcpb · stillos-ratings-mcp.mcpb
Download bundleCheck the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.
SHA-256
6f048f6a2db6faa962f78aaa7eb87a6c56ded9d33c0fd97ae7fde5bbd3342c9d
macOS / Linux
echo "6f048f6a2db6faa962f78aaa7eb87a6c56ded9d33c0fd97ae7fde5bbd3342c9d stillos-ratings-mcp.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
Windows (PowerShell)
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\stillos-ratings-mcp.mcpb).Hash -eq "6f048f6a2db6faa962f78aaa7eb87a6c56ded9d33c0fd97ae7fde5bbd3342c9d"
Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp server?
io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp. Check an MCP server before you install it, outside-in trust ratings for 7,000+ operators. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp/releases/download/v1.0.0/stillos-ratings-mcp.mcpb).
Is the io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp scores 57 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp server expose?
io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp exposes 3 tools: check_mcp_server, list_tool_surface_findings, compare_mcp_servers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 337 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp server under?
io.github.stillmarcus24/stillos-ratings-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.