io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp
PYPI · STOREPILOT · SCANNED SEP 21
Run an app portfolio across Google Play and the App Store: vitals, reviews, earnings, releases.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security50
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 56 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 35 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability86
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 148 tokens (~148/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp server?
io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx storepilot. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · storepilot
claude mcp add sonlenef-storepilot-mcp -- uvx storepilot
{
"mcpServers": {
"sonlenef-storepilot-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"storepilot"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"sonlenef-storepilot-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"storepilot"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add sonlenef-storepilot-mcp -- uvx storepilot
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"sonlenef-storepilot-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"storepilot"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add sonlenef-storepilot-mcp --command uvx --arg storepilot
mcp_servers:
sonlenef-storepilot-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["storepilot"] {
"McpServers": {
"sonlenef-storepilot-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"storepilot"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add sonlenef-storepilot-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a storepilot
{
"mcpServers": {
"sonlenef-storepilot-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"storepilot"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 −17
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
- 16 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 15 Sept 26 +16
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 14 Sept 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/storepilot@0.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 56 packages
| Packages resolved | 56 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
setup_doctor ~148
Diagnose StorePilot's store credentials and report exactly what is missing. Runs every setup step independently and reports all of them, so a single failure never hides the rest. For Google Play it verifies: the service account key parses (and shows the email you must grant access to), the Android Publisher API is reachable, the Play Developer Reporting API is reachable and lists your apps, the "Reply to reviews" permission is present (the API returns an empty list rather than an error when it is missing), and the Cloud Storage reports bucket is configured and readable. Each failing step comes with the exact fix. Run this first whenever a Play tool returns empty or unexpected data.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp server?
io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp. Run an app portfolio across Google Play and the App Store: vitals, reviews, earnings, releases. This page covers its PyPI package (storepilot).
Is the io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 21 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp server expose?
io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp exposes 1 tool: setup_doctor. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 148 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp server under?
io.github.sonlenef/storepilot-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.