Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.sns45/better-call-claude

NPM · BETTER-CALL-CLAUDE

Voice Calls, SMS, and WhatsApp for Claude Code with cross-channel context sharing.

Available components

0 this week 38 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 14% of npm servers

Category Communication

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • Known CVEs were checked across the 214 of 215 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • Dependency health was assessed across the 214 of 215 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 26 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 12 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 11 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Sept 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 23 Sept 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/better-call-claude@3.1.3

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 214 packages
Packages resolved 214
Deprecated 1
Stale 52
Tree resolution Partial

The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.

Install

How do I install the io.github.sns45/better-call-claude MCP server?

io.github.sns45/better-call-claude runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y better-call-claude. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · better-call-claude

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add sns45-better-call-claude -- npx -y better-call-claude
Common questions

What is the io.github.sns45/better-call-claude MCP server?

io.github.sns45/better-call-claude is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.sns45/better-call-claude. Voice Calls, SMS, and WhatsApp for Claude Code with cross-channel context sharing. This page covers its npm package (better-call-claude).

Is the io.github.sns45/better-call-claude MCP server safe to use?

io.github.sns45/better-call-claude scores 38 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the io.github.sns45/better-call-claude MCP server still maintained?

io.github.sns45/better-call-claude is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.sns45/better-call-claude MCP server under?

io.github.sns45/better-call-claude declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.