Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

sift

PYPI · SIFT-CLI

Runs a command, keeps every byte on disk, returns only the lines that matter

Available components

+3 this week 89 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 90% of PyPI servers

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to slymnysr/sift). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 43 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1857 tokens (~265/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
  • Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 12 Oct 26 −12
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 7 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/sift-cli@1.1.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo slymnysr/sift
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/slymnysr/sift/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v1.1.0
Rekor log index 2772612217
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:333b9b1819deddee82db247567a17a83a4285b6bf4355a9ff7c8a163e9afa5ea

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~1,211 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
digest ~154

Read a file and return a distilled view of what is in it instead of its text. This is for anything already written down that would flood the conversation if opened whole: a log, a saved build or CI transcript, a test report, a crash dump, a long JSON export. The server opens the file, so its contents never enter the conversation -- a 40,000-line log costs a screenful -- and every line shown is the file's own, byte for byte, with `peek` on the same path returning any range in full. Use `outline` instead when the file is source code and the question is what it declares.

NameTypeReqDescription
budget–––
keep–––
pathstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

digest_many ~110

Digest several files in one call, asked at the same time. Use it whenever there is more than one file to read: four logs cost four waits asked one by one and roughly one wait asked together, and come back as one tool result instead of four. Each file keeps its own last line saying which it is, and a file that cannot be read says so in its place rather than taking the others down with it.

NameTypeReqDescription
budget–––
keep–––
pathsarrayyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

follow ~254

Return what a background command has printed since the last time you asked, and nothing you have already been shown. Use it with the handle from a `run` call made with `background`. The lines keep the numbers they have in the whole run, so `peek` on any of them returns that same line; a stretch that was only progress comes back as a gap saying how many lines it stands for, and a quiet minute comes back as nothing at all rather than as filler. Set `stop` when you are done with the command: it ends it, and everything it started, and returns the last of the output. Always stop a command you are finished with -- a background command left alone keeps running. With `everything` it answers about every run still going in one call, which is what to use when you started three things and want to know where they are. With `wait` it holds until something is actually said rather than coming back empty: an empty answer is a tool result that stays in the conversation for the rest of it, so waiting once costs less than asking five times.

NameTypeReqDescription
everythingboolean––
handle–––
stopboolean––
waitnumber––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

outline ~140

Return what a file declares -- its types, functions, exports, targets and settings -- without their bodies, so that reading a 2,000-line source file costs a page. This is the machine behind `run` asked a different question: it holds no table of languages and never reads the suffix, so it answers about Rust, Haskell, a Makefile, a config file with no extension, or a language that did not exist last year. Lines come from the file byte for byte, and `peek` on the same path returns any range of it in full.

NameTypeReqDescription
budget–––
keep–––
pathstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

peek ~167

Return the exact original lines of a capture or a file, byte for byte, with the line numbers they had there. Use it with the handle at the end of a `run` result, or with any path, to open up a gap that a view left behind. A range reaching past the end is clamped rather than refused, and with no range at all it returns the whole thing. With `grep` it searches instead: every line matching your pattern comes back with a few lines of context around it, which is the way into a gap when you know the word you want but not the line number.

NameTypeReqDescription
aroundinteger––
capinteger––
first–––
grep–––
handlestringyes–
last–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

run ~205

Run a shell command and return only the lines that mattered instead of all of its output. Every byte is kept on disk and never enters the conversation, so a 5,000-line test run costs a few dozen lines of context -- and goes on costing nothing on every later turn, because tool results are re-sent with the rest of the transcript. The lines shown are the command's own, byte for byte; each gap states how many lines it stands for, and `peek` with the returned handle brings any range back in full. Prefer this over a plain shell tool whenever the output may be long or noisy. When you already know what you are looking for -- a symbol, a test name, an error code -- pass it as `keep` and every line containing it comes back whatever else was chosen.

NameTypeReqDescription
backgroundboolean––
budget–––
commandstringyes–
cwd–––
keep–––
timeout–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

tool ~181

Run one of three dense tools and return a distilled view of what it printed: `sg` (ast-grep) for structural search, `diff` (difftastic) for a diff that can tell a reindent from a change, `loc` (scc) for the size of a tree. Each of them answers a question *without opening the file* -- reach for `sg` instead of reading candidates to find where a shape occurs, and `loc` instead of listing a directory to size it. Their output is large by nature and is distilled like anything else, so a 4,000-line structural search costs a screenful with every byte still reachable through `peek`. A tool this machine does not have says so and says what it is called; nothing is installed for you.

NameTypeReqDescription
args–––
namestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the sift MCP server?

sift runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx sift-cli. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · sift-cli

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add slymnysr-sift -- uvx sift-cli
Common questions

What is the sift MCP server?

sift is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.slymnysr/sift. Runs a command, keeps every byte on disk, returns only the lines that matter. This page covers its PyPI package (sift-cli).

Is the sift MCP server safe to use?

sift scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 23 October 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the sift MCP server expose?

sift exposes 7 tools: run, follow, outline, digest, tool, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,211 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the sift MCP server still maintained?

sift is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the sift MCP server under?

sift declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.