Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SiteGPT Docs

REMOTE · SITEGPT.AI

Search the SiteGPT documentation: setup, features, API reference, troubleshooting.

Available components

0 this week 89 Trust /100

Last scanned (10 hours ago)

Scores higher than 96% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.

Category Code Search and Documentation

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1387 tokens (~346/item across 4 items; 3 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 6 Nov 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “query_docs_filesystem_site_gpt_docs” changed its title: Query documentation filesystem cosmetic

    1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 23 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 16 Sept 26 0
    • Tool “query_docs_filesystem_site_gpt_docs” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_site_gpt_docs” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 307 → 345 ▼ functional
    • “submit_feedback” reworded the description of “path” cosmetic
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=sitegpt.ai CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 5 Nov 2026 3 Feb 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 e921a058b76ad5fe0e4ee578e660beec
SANs: sitegpt.ai, convex.sitegpt.ai
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of sitegpt.ai. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. DS published 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
sitegpt.ai. DS published 2371 13 Verified
sitegpt.ai. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy worker-src 'self' blob:; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests; frame-ancestors 'self' https://dashboard.mintlify.com https://app.mintlify.com; form-action 'self'; default-src 'self' https:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https:; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self' data: https:; media-src 'self' data: blob: https:; frame-src 'self' blob: https:; connect-src 'self' data: https: wss:;
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~1,158 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
query_docs_filesystem_site_gpt_docs ~862

Run a read-only shell-like query against a virtualized, in-memory filesystem rooted at `/` that contains ONLY the SiteGPT Docs documentation pages and OpenAPI specs. This is NOT a shell on any real machine — nothing runs on the user's computer, the server host, or any network. The filesystem is a sandbox backed by documentation chunks. This is how you read documentation pages: there is no separate "get page" tool. To read a page, pass its `.mdx` path to `head` or `cat` — a page at the URL path `/some/page` lives at `/some/page.mdx`. To search the docs with exact keyword or regex matches, use `rg`. To understand the docs structure, use `tree` or `ls`. **Paths are specific to this site — never guess them.** Discover real paths with `tree / -L 2`, `ls /`, or the search tool before reading. If a path does not exist, that only means the guess was wrong; it does NOT mean the topic is undocumented — use `rg -il "keyword" /` to find where it is covered. **Workflow:** Start with the search tool for broad or conceptual queries like "how to authenticate" or "rate limiting". Use this tool when you need exact keyword/regex matching, structural exploration, or to read the full content of a specific page by path. Supported commands: rg (ripgrep), grep, find, tree, ls, cat, head, tail, stat, wc, sort, uniq, cut, sed, awk, jq, plus basic text utilities. No writes, no network, no process control. Run `--help` on any command for usage. Each call is STATELESS: the working directory always resets to `/` and no shell variables, aliases, or history carry over between calls. If you need to operate in a subdirectory, chain commands in one call with `&&` or pass absolute paths (e.g., `cd /some-directory && ls` or `ls /some-directory`). Do NOT assume that `cd` in one call affects the next call. Examples (replace the placeholder paths with real ones from `tree` or search): - `tree / -L 2` — see the top-level directory layout - `rg -il "rate limit" /` — find all files mentioning "rate li…

NameTypeReqDescription
commandstringyesA shell command to run against the virtualized documentation filesystem (e.g., `rg -il "keyword" /`, `tree / -L 2`, `head -80 /path/file.mdx`).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_site_gpt_docs ~171

Search across the SiteGPT Docs knowledge base to find relevant information, code examples, API references, and guides. Use this tool when you need to answer questions about SiteGPT Docs, find specific documentation, understand how features work, or locate implementation details. The search returns contextual content with titles and direct links to the documentation pages. If you need the full content of a specific page, use the query_docs_filesystem tool to `head` or `cat` the page path (append `.mdx` to the path returned from search — e.g. a result at `/some/page` is read with `head -200 /some/page.mdx`).

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesSearch query
versionstring–Filter to specific version (e.g., 'v0.7')

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

submit_feedback ~125

Report a problem with this documentation site so the docs team can fix it. Use when a documentation page is incorrect, outdated, confusing, incomplete, or has a broken example. This is for feedback about the documentation content itself — not for product support requests or feedback about this tool or assistant.

NameTypeReqDescription
feedbackstringyesA clear description of the documentation issue or suggestion — what is incorrect, outdated, missing, or confusing.
pathstringyesThe URL path of the documentation page the feedback is about (the page you were reading, without the `.mdx` extension).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SiteGPT Docs MCP server?

SiteGPT Docs is a hosted endpoint at https://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · sitegpt.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http sitegpt-sitegpt-docs 'https://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp'
Common questions

What is the SiteGPT Docs MCP server?

SiteGPT Docs is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.sitegpt/sitegpt-docs. Search the SiteGPT documentation: setup, features, API reference, troubleshooting. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://sitegpt.ai/docs/mcp).

Is the SiteGPT Docs MCP server safe to use?

SiteGPT Docs scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SiteGPT Docs MCP server expose?

SiteGPT Docs exposes 3 tools: search_site_gpt_docs, query_docs_filesystem_site_gpt_docs, submit_feedback. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,158 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SiteGPT Docs MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SiteGPT Docs without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SiteGPT Docs MCP server still maintained?

SiteGPT Docs is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the SiteGPT Docs MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on SiteGPT Docs, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.