FAI Legal Research
REMOTE · FAILEGAL.SITE
Pakistani case law and statutes: Supreme Court and High Court judgments, laws, drafting templates.
Available components
Last scanned (19 hours ago)
Scores higher than 89% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 834 tokens (~166/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage98
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 92% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 2 Nov 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 0
- Tool “search_judgments” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://failegal.site/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=failegal.site | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 20 Sept 2026 | 19 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 62ba72ba1ac040ea24c6977af5e049ae62d |
| SANs: failegal.site | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of failegal.site. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| site. | present | 31826 | 13 | Verified |
| failegal.site. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://failegal.site/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://failegal.site/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://failegal.site/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_drafting_template Get a Pakistani legal drafting template ~75
Return one reviewed template: its structure, the facts that must be collected first, and the standard wording for its Pakistani forum. Ask the user for any missing facts, never invent them, then fill the template.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| template_id | string | yes | An id from list_drafting_templates, e.g. "legal-notice". |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | – |
| forum | string | – | – |
| found | boolean | yes | – |
| id | string | – | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| name | string | – | – |
| note | string | yes | – |
| template | string | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_statute_section Get a section of a Pakistani law ~106
Return the full text of one section or article of a Pakistani law when the act and number are known, e.g. act "PPC", section "392"; act "Constitution", section "199".
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | yes | Act name or common short form: PPC, CrPC, CPC, Constitution, Contract Act, Qanun-e-Shahadat... |
| section | string | yes | Section or article number, e.g. "489-F", "199". |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| found | boolean | yes | – |
| message | string | – | – |
| note | string | yes | – |
| sections | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_drafting_templates List Pakistani legal drafting templates ~89
List FAI's reviewed Pakistani legal drafting templates (legal notice, plaint, bail application, written statement, affidavit, agreements, family and rent matters and more). Use when the user wants to draft a Pakistani legal document; then call get_drafting_template with the chosen id.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filter | string | – | Optional words to narrow the list, e.g. "bail" or "notice". |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | number | yes | – |
| note | string | yes | – |
| templates | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_judgments Search Pakistani judgments ~236
Find reported judgments (case law, precedents) of Pakistani courts: Supreme Court of Pakistan, Lahore, Sindh, Peshawar, Balochistan and Islamabad High Courts, Federal Shariat Court and others. Use for any request like "Supreme Court judgment on bike snatching", "case law on pre-arrest bail mala fide", "precedent on specific performance". Returns citation (e.g. 2022 SCMR 1577), court, year, parties, judges, provisions and a sentence from the court's own judgment, ranked by relevance; off-topic matches are dropped, so an empty list means no on-point judgment was found. Pakistan only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| court | string | – | Only this court. Omit to search all Pakistani courts. |
| limit | integer | – | How many judgments to return (max 5). |
| query | string | yes | The legal issue or facts in plain English, e.g. "motorcycle snatched at gunpoint robbery conviction". |
| year_from | integer | – | Earliest year of the report. |
| year_to | integer | – | Latest year of the report. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| note | string | yes | – |
| results | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_statutes Search Pakistani statutes ~174
Find the sections of Pakistani laws relevant to a question: Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), the Constitution, Contract Act, Limitation Act, Qanun-e-Shahadat, family, tax, labour and provincial laws. Use for "punishment for snatching a motorcycle", "which section covers cheque dishonour", "bail in a non-bailable offence". Understands everyday words (murder finds qatl-i-amd, s.302 PPC). Returns section text with its citation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | – | Only search this act, e.g. "Code of Criminal Procedure". |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | The question or topic, or a section reference like "section 302 PPC". |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| note | string | yes | – |
| results | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the FAI Legal Research MCP server?
FAI Legal Research is a hosted endpoint at https://failegal.site/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · failegal.site
claude mcp add --transport http site-failegal-fai-legal 'https://failegal.site/mcp'
What is the FAI Legal Research MCP server?
FAI Legal Research is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as site.failegal/fai-legal. Pakistani case law and statutes: Supreme Court and High Court judgments, laws, drafting templates. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://failegal.site/mcp).
Is the FAI Legal Research MCP server safe to use?
FAI Legal Research scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the FAI Legal Research MCP server expose?
FAI Legal Research exposes 5 tools: search_judgments, search_statutes, get_statute_section, list_drafting_templates, get_drafting_template. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 680 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the FAI Legal Research MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to FAI Legal Research without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the FAI Legal Research MCP server still maintained?
FAI Legal Research is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.