Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

GitPin

NPM · GITPIN · SCANNED SEP 20

Prove and verify multi-repo claims at Git HEAD: path, line, full SHA, no index.

Available components

−1 this week 91 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 33 of 101 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to shmindmaster/gitpin). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 658 tokens (~50/item across 13 items; 12 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
  • Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the GitPin MCP server?

GitPin runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y gitpin. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · gitpin

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add shmindmaster-gitpin -- npx -y gitpin
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shmindmaster-gitpin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gitpin"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "shmindmaster-gitpin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gitpin"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add shmindmaster-gitpin -- npx -y gitpin
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "shmindmaster-gitpin": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "gitpin"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add shmindmaster-gitpin --command npx --arg -y --arg gitpin
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  shmindmaster-gitpin:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "gitpin"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "shmindmaster-gitpin": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "gitpin"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add shmindmaster-gitpin -t stdio -c npx -a -y gitpin
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shmindmaster-gitpin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gitpin"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 19 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 17 Sept 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 16 Sept 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified security
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
    • Package version: 0.6.3 → 0.6.4 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/gitpin@0.6.4

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo shmindmaster/gitpin
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/shmindmaster/gitpin/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.6.4
Rekor log index 2858121701
Predicate type https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:c8329f2193040489bf68f0f3b4dd2137d5abaa6559157bd05fdd1e87b19ac824d759b450a3269b7dd43a94f799268b9d5dad6af5723cba51b7debd10b

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 101 packages
Packages resolved 101
Stale 33
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~643 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
pin.analyze ~34

EvidenceBrief (knownFacts/gaps/evidenceSetId), documentation gaps, or coverage compare. Decision evidence—not a dump.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.catalog ~43

Call first to discover registered Git roots (HEAD SHAs, doc counts, stale). Not a content claim. Use before search/prove.

NameTypeReqDescription
viewstring

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.compare ~47

Diff changed paths between two hex revisions. Bounded change evidence for reviews—not semantic search.

NameTypeReqDescription
basestringyes
headstringyes
repositorystringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.get_doc ~45

Read one committed documentation page as a pinned evidence slice with full SHA. Prefer pin.prove for claims.

NameTypeReqDescription
repositorystringyes
sourcePathstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.inspect ~53

Inspect HEAD-pinned status, commits, manifests, tests, or recent changes. status shows dirty work excluded from evidence.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger
operationstringyes
repositorystringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.prove ~80

Primary product tool: one-path evidence pack (slice, path, line, full SHA, content hash, handle, verify next-step). Prefer for every factual claim.

NameTypeReqDescription
claimstring
lineEndinteger
lineStartinteger
repositorystringyes
sourcePathstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.prove_set ~47

Multi-cite evidence set (1–8 paths, multi-repo OK). Use when an answer needs several citations. Next: pin.verify_set.

NameTypeReqDescription
itemsarrayyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.read ~66

Read a HEAD-only source slice (path, lines, full SHA). Sensitive paths blocked. Prefer pin.prove when making a claim.

NameTypeReqDescription
lineEndinteger
lineStartinteger
repositorystringyes
sourcePathstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.search_code ~53

Find code candidates via git grep at HEAD. Never treat hits as final claims—pin.prove then pin.verify (or prove_set/verify_set).

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes
repositorystringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.search_docs ~48

Find documentation candidates (not claims). Before any factual assertion call pin.prove or pin.prove_set, then pin.verify.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes
repositorystring

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.verify ~74

Close the prove loop: re-check path@SHA with git show; optional mustContain for claim-text. Reports HEAD match and claimVerdict.

NameTypeReqDescription
lineinteger
mustContainstring
repositorystringyes
shastringyes
sourcePathstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin.verify_set ~53

Batch re-check up to 8 citations (from pin.prove_set or a pack). For multi-repo answers and CI citation gates.

NameTypeReqDescription
evidenceSetIdstring
itemsarrayyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the GitPin MCP server?

GitPin is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.shmindmaster/gitpin. Prove and verify multi-repo claims at Git HEAD: path, line, full SHA, no index. This page covers its npm package (gitpin).

Is the GitPin MCP server safe to use?

GitPin scores 91 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the GitPin MCP server expose?

GitPin exposes 12 tools: pin.catalog, pin.search_docs, pin.search_code, pin.prove, pin.prove_set, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 643 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the GitPin MCP server still maintained?

GitPin is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the GitPin MCP server under?

GitPin declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.