io.github.shashwatgtm/impact-mcp
NPM · @SHASHWATGTMALPHA/IMPACT-MCP · SCANNED AUG 3
Hypothesis-Driven B2B Positioning Engine - 8 strategic positioning tools
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Supply Chain Security70
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 0.6.1, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Only part of the dependency tree could be resolved (13 of 14), so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 197 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 823 tokens (~102/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
npm · @shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp
claude mcp add shashwatgtm-impact-mcp -- npx -y @shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp
codex mcp add shashwatgtm-impact-mcp -- npx -y @shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"shashwatgtm-impact-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add shashwatgtm-impact-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg @shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp
mcp_servers:
shashwatgtm-impact-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp"] {
"mcpServers": {
"shashwatgtm-impact-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@shashwatgtmalpha/impact-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 2 Aug 26 +20
- Known CVEs: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: unverified → 0.20 ▲ functional
- Dependency health: unverified → partial ▲ functional
- 1 Aug 26 −5
- Known CVEs: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Dependency health: partial → unverified ▼ functional
- 31 Jul 26 −20
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 −9
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Install scripts: pass → unverified ▼ security
- License: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Maintenance: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 27 Jul 26 +46
- CVE-2025-66414 affects this package: high ▼ security
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Known CVEs: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Install scripts: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- License: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Schema quality: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: good functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 26 Jul 26 27
First indexed and scored.
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Analysed npm/@shashwatgtmalpha/[email protected]
Provenance none
Ecosystem: npm · Outcome: none
Vulnerabilities 1 finding
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w | CVE-2025-66414 | high | yes |
Dependencies 13 packages
13 packages in the resolved dependency tree · 13 deprecated · 6 stale.
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
impact_anchor_market ~120
Select beachhead market with scoring and TAM/SAM/SOM framework
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| average_deal_size | string | — | Optional: Your ACV (e.g., "$50K") |
| current_customers | string | — | Optional: Description of your current/best customers |
| potential_segments | array | — | List of potential market segments (e.g., ["Mid-market SaaS", "Enterprise Finance", "SMB Retail"]) |
| product_description | string | yes | What your product does |
| sales_cycle | string | — | Optional: Typical sales cycle length |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_craft_message ~104
Build positioning statement and message hierarchy with variations
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| competitor | string | — | Primary alternative/competitor |
| customer_need | string | — | The need or opportunity they have |
| differentiation | string | yes | Your unique differentiation |
| key_benefit | string | yes | Primary benefit/reason to buy |
| product_category | string | — | Your product category |
| product_name | string | — | Your product name |
| target_customer | string | yes | Target customer description |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_full_audit ~121
Complete positioning audit with scoring and recommendations
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_name | string | — | Your company name |
| competitors | array | — | Main competitors |
| current_positioning | string | — | Optional: Your current positioning statement or tagline |
| customer_feedback | string | — | Optional: What customers say about you |
| key_differentiation | string | — | What makes you unique |
| problem_solved | string | yes | The problem you solve |
| product_description | string | yes | What your product does |
| target_customer | string | yes | Who you serve |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_get_framework ~48
Get complete IMPACT framework methodology with phase-by-phase guidance
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| focus_phase | string | — | Optional: specific phase to focus on (identify/map/pinpoint/anchor/craft/translate) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_identify_champions ~118
Generate champion hypotheses from company/product context - no blanks, actionable insights
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_name | string | — | Your company name |
| price_point | string | — | Optional: ACV range (e.g., "$50K-100K") |
| problem_solved | string | yes | The core problem you solve |
| product_description | string | yes | What your product does (1-2 sentences) |
| target_company_type | string | — | Type of companies you target (e.g., "Series B SaaS", "Enterprise manufacturing") |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_map_alternatives ~99
Analyze competitive landscape and find positioning whitespace
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Your product category (e.g., "Sales engagement", "Data platform") |
| competitor_weaknesses | string | — | Optional: Known competitor weaknesses or customer complaints |
| competitors | array | — | List of competitor names |
| your_product | string | yes | What your product does |
| your_strengths | string | — | Optional: What you do better than competitors |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_pinpoint_value ~121
Generate value proposition with quantification and proof points
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | — | Product category |
| customer_metrics | string | — | Optional: Any customer results data (e.g., "40% faster, 3x pipeline") |
| key_outcome | string | yes | The main result customers achieve |
| product_name | string | — | Your product/company name |
| target_customer | string | yes | Who you serve (e.g., "B2B sales teams") |
| unique_capability | string | yes | What you do that others cannot/don't |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact_translate_execution ~92
Adapt positioning for specific channels and touchpoints
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| channels | array | — | Channels to optimize for (e.g., ["website", "linkedin", "email", "sales_deck"]) |
| key_benefit | string | yes | Primary benefit |
| positioning_statement | string | yes | Your core positioning statement |
| product_name | string | — | Your product name |
| target_customer | string | yes | Target customer profile |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.