ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing
MCPB · ABOVO-MCP-SERVER-1.1.1.MCPB
Publish content to the web by emailing POST@abovo.co. No API key, no signup. SMTP is the API.
Available components
Last scanned (9 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 79% of MCPB servers
Category Documents and Files
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 96 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability39
- 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 247 tokens (~82/item across 3 items; 2 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (12)
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (4)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
- Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
- Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
- Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 3 Nov 26 −1
- Maintenance: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 1 Nov 26 +2
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 31 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 30 Oct 26 −1
- Maintenance: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 25 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 24 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 23 Oct 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/seanfenlon/abovo-mcp-server/releases/download/v1.1.1/abovo-mcp-server-1.1.1.mcpb@1.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_abovo_info ~44
Get information about ABOVO.co capabilities, URL formats, groups, or use cases.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | What information to retrieve about ABOVO.co |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
publish_to_web ~196
Publish content to a public web page on ABOVO.co by emailing it through a single, server-configured SMTP identity. Accepts a subject, body, format (text or html), and an optional group. Does NOT support file attachments — the input schema is limited to subject/body/format/group. Returns a confirmation and a link to the sender's ABOVO.co page; it does NOT return the exact URL of the new post (ABOVO.co emails that permanent URL to the sending address separately). Not idempotent: repeated calls create duplicate posts.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | string | yes | Content to publish. Can be plain text or HTML. |
| format | string | – | Content format |
| group | string | – | Group name. If provided, posts to [group]@abovo.co instead. Letters, digits and hyphens only. |
| subject | string | yes | Subject line / title of the web page |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing MCP server?
ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. The MCP registry declares no SHA-256 for this bundle, so there is no published digest to check the download against.
mcpb · abovo-mcp-server-1.1.1.mcpb
Download bundleThe MCP registry declares no SHA-256 for this bundle, so there is no published digest to check it against. Open it with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing MCP server?
ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.seanfenlon/abovo-mcp-server. Publish content to the web by emailing POST@abovo.co. No API key, no signup. SMTP is the API. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/seanfenlon/abovo-mcp-server/releases/download/v1.1.1/abovo-mcp-server-1.1.1.mcpb).
Is the ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing MCP server safe to use?
ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing scores 48 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing MCP server expose?
ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing exposes 2 tools: publish_to_web, get_abovo_info. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 240 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing MCP server under?
ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 8 more. 4 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about ABOVO.co — Email-to-Web Publishing: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts and Dependency health. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an MCPB bundle, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.