knowmind
NPM · KNOWMIND · SCANNED SEP 20
AI agent memory & knowledge graph, hosted in Germany (GDPR). Recall, relations, store via MCP.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security90
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects sharp 0.34.5, reached via @huggingface/transformers > sharp. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 23 of 78 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (1 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to Schubeler-Consulting/knowmind). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 12 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 4087 tokens (~314/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
- Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the knowmind MCP server?
knowmind runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y knowmind. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · knowmind
claude mcp add schubeler-consulting-knowmind -- npx -y knowmind
{
"mcpServers": {
"schubeler-consulting-knowmind": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"knowmind"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"schubeler-consulting-knowmind": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"knowmind"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add schubeler-consulting-knowmind -- npx -y knowmind
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"schubeler-consulting-knowmind": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"knowmind"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add schubeler-consulting-knowmind --command npx --arg -y --arg knowmind
mcp_servers:
schubeler-consulting-knowmind:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "knowmind"] {
"McpServers": {
"schubeler-consulting-knowmind": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"knowmind"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add schubeler-consulting-knowmind -t stdio -c npx -a -y knowmind
{
"mcpServers": {
"schubeler-consulting-knowmind": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"knowmind"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 −2
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 16 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 15 Sept 26 +1
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 14 Sept 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 −2
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 9 Sept 26 +15
- GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c affects this package: high ▼ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/knowmind@0.3.7
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | Schubeler-Consulting/knowmind |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/Schubeler-Consulting/knowmind/.github/workflows/publish-npm.yml@refs/tags/v0.3.7 |
| Rekor log index | 2752965018 |
| Predicate type | https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:87f51c89e0f20fc0edcdc0166ca6ceb6b781330a8d3813a4195d62cad5e11452961cf93625e0c47f2e9f14d8d50134efaf02510d1b7ac0044e54a9e76 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 2 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj | high | yes | ||
| GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c | high | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 78 packages
| Packages resolved | 78 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 1 |
| Stale | 23 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
knowmind_entity ~256
Create the node for a thing the corpus talks about - a person, an organisation, an application, a host, a technology - or return the existing one. THE GRAPH NEEDS THESE: memories are texts, and two texts mentioning the same server stay unconnected until that server exists as its own node. Create an entity when a name recurs across memories or when you are about to link something that has no node yet, then connect it with knowmind_link. Same name, same class and same tenant always return the same id, so calling twice creates no duplicate. Give the entity its plain proper name ("PostgreSQL", not "the database we use"), and pick the class from the catalogue in knowmind_schema. Requires write scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| aliases | array | – | Other spellings the same thing appears under. Optional. |
| description | string | – | One sentence saying what this is. Optional, helps later retrieval. |
| entity_class | string | yes | Class from the catalogue (knowmind_schema -> entityClasses), e.g. Person, Organization, Application, Host, Technology. |
| name | string | yes | Proper name of the thing, as it would be written in a document. No role, no status, no description. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_health ~63
Return the health of the knowmind backend (Postgres, memory service, graph). Use before a batch of writes or when calls fail, to tell an outage apart from an empty result. Returns a status object per component. Read scope suffices; takes no parameters.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_link ~846
Create a typed relation between two memory nodes (a knowledge-graph edge). THIS IS HOW THE GRAPH IS BUILT: after storing memories, connect them - a corpus without edges answers only what a single note already says. Subject and object classes must match the predicate; the inverse edge is materialized automatically, and derived edges (RUNS_ON, WORKS_FOR_CLIENT, HOST_SERVES_CLIENT, DEPENDS_ON_SUPPLIER) are computed by the server - never set them by hand. Get both node IDs via knowmind_recall first, and call knowmind_schema for the full catalogue with explanations. Allowed rel_type values: ABOUT (Contract|Document|FileResource → Topic), CLIENT_OF (Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent → Organization), CONTACT_PERSON_FOR (Person → Organization), COVERED_BY (Topic → Contract|Document|FileResource), DELIVERED_AS (Application → Product), DELIVERED_BY (Product → Application), DEPENDS_ON (Application → Application), DEPLOYED_TO (Application → Container), DEVELOPED_BY (Application → Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent), DEVELOPS (Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent → Application), ENABLES (Application → Application), FOR_CLIENT (Project → Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent), HAS_CHILD (Person → Person), HAS_CLIENT (Organization → Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent), HAS_CONTACT_PERSON (Organization → Person), HAS_EMPLOYEE (Organization → Person), HAS_OPERATED_APPLICATION (Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent → Application), HAS_PARENT (Person → Person), HAS_PROJECT (Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent → Project), HAS_ROLE (Person → Role), HAS_SIBLING (Person → Person), HAS_SKILL (Agent|Organization|Person|SoftwareAgent → Skill), HOSTED_ON (Container → Host), HOSTS (Host → Container), HOSTS_APPLICATION (Container → Application), INFRASTRUCTURE_PROVIDED_BY (Host → Organization), INTEGRATES_WITH (Application → Application), IS_LED_BY (Organization → Person), KNOWS (Person → Person), LEADS (Person → Organization), OPERATED_FOR (Application → Agent|Organ…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| confidence | number | – | Edge confidence in [0..1]; 1.0 for a fact stated verbatim, 0.7 for a clear paraphrase. Below that, do not create the edge. |
| from_id | string | yes | Memory ID of the source node (get it via knowmind_recall). |
| rel_type | string | yes | Edge type in UPPER_SNAKE_CASE from the allowed list. Must fit the subject and object classes. |
| to_id | string | yes | Memory ID of the target node. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_list_recent ~111
List the most recently created documents/memories in the tenant corpus, newest first (by created_at). Same corpus that recall searches. Use to review what was just stored or confirm a write landed; use knowmind_recall when you already know what you are looking for. Graph-only entities without a timestamp do not appear, so this count intentionally differs from stats.memories. Read scope suffices.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| k | integer | – | Number of newest entries to return (1-50, default 10). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_list_relations ~93
List all relations of one memory (incoming and outgoing), each with its edge type and the connected node. Use to inspect how an entity is connected before adding or removing edges with knowmind_link/knowmind_unlink; find the memory_id first via knowmind_recall. Read scope suffices.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| memory_id | string | yes | Memory ID whose relations to list (get it via knowmind_recall). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_recall ~171
Retrieve relevant knowledge before answering anything that benefits from prior context - decisions, preferences, project state, people, deadlines, past conversations. Hybrid recall (BM25 + pgvector + graph hops) over the tenant corpus; returns the top-k memory chunks, each with a relevance score and source reference. Suitable whenever earlier context would improve the answer; use knowmind_recall_at_time when you need what was valid at a past point in time. Read scope suffices.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| hops | integer | – | Graph expansion depth over typed relations (0-3, default 2); 0 = text/vector only, no graph. |
| k | integer | – | Number of chunks to return (1-25, default 5). |
| query | string | yes | Natural-language question; full sentences retrieve better than keywords. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_recall_at_time ~152
Time-travel recall: return only memories that were valid at a given instant (valid_from <= as_of <= valid_to, or still open). Answers 'what did the agent know on March 14?'. Use instead of knowmind_recall when the point in time matters; otherwise use knowmind_recall for the current truth. Read scope suffices.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_of | string | – | ISO-8601 timestamp to evaluate validity at; defaults to now. Example: '2026-03-14T00:00:00Z'. |
| k | integer | – | Number of chunks to return (1-25, default 5). |
| query | string | yes | Natural-language question. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_schema ~68
Return the relation catalogue of this tenant's knowledge graph: every allowed edge type with its subject and object classes and an explanation of when to use it. Call this before building edges with knowmind_link, so you pick the right predicate instead of the nearest-sounding one. Read scope suffices.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_stats ~58
Return current counts for the tenant corpus: memories, graph edges and vector chunks. Use to gauge how much has been stored; for the actual entries use knowmind_list_recent or knowmind_recall. Read scope suffices; takes no parameters.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_store_memory ~1,115
Store durable insights the moment they arise - decisions, preferences, facts, results, appointments. Persists one memory entry in the tenant corpus (Postgres + vector index + graph node), afterwards findable via knowmind_recall and knowmind_list_recent. Append-only: the same title replaces nothing (use knowmind_update_fact to supersede); sha-identical content is detected as idempotent (unchanged). Returns the new memory id. Use for a single short fact; for long or multi-fact text use knowmind_upload_document. GIVE THE EDGES ALONG: whatever the text says about people, organisations, projects, hosts or technologies belongs into `relations` in THIS call - name the counterpart, the server creates its node and the edge, no second call needed. A memory without edges is a note; with edges it becomes a graph that answers questions nobody wrote down. Use knowmind_link separately only to connect two entries that already exist. Requires write scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| content | string | yes | The memory text. Keep it to one atomic fact per entry so it stays retrievable and updatable. |
| domain | string | – | Knowledge domain this entry belongs to, by its short key (e.g. 'sales', 'engineering'). Unknown keys are ignored and the entry stays unassigned - it is never guessed into a domain. |
| memory_type | string | – | Kind of memory: semantic (durable fact), episodic (event), procedural (how-to), reference (pointer to a resource). Default semantic. |
| relations | array | – | Edges from this entry to the things it talks about - set them HERE, in the same call. Name the counterpart in plain words; the server finds or creates its node and draws the edge, so you need neither… |
| source | string | – | Where this came from - URL, file path, or a short note. Free text, stored for provenance. |
| tags | array | – | Free-text keywords for later filtering (lowercase, no spaces recommended). |
| title | string | – | Short human-readable title (a few words). Not a uniqueness key - duplicate titles create separate entries. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_unlink ~108
Delete a typed relation between two memory nodes; the inverse edge is removed with it. Idempotent - deleting a non-existent edge is a no-op. Use to correct a wrong link created via knowmind_link. Requires write scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| from_id | string | yes | Memory ID of the source node. |
| rel_type | string | yes | Edge type to remove (UPPER_SNAKE_CASE, exactly as created). |
| to_id | string | yes | Memory ID of the target node. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_update_fact ~193
Supersede a known fact without losing history: the existing memory gets valid_to=now, a new memory with valid_from=now is created and linked via SUPERSEDES. Use this instead of knowmind_store_memory when a fact CHANGES (address moved, contract renewed) - old statements are marked outdated, not deleted, so the timeline stays auditable and queryable via knowmind_recall_at_time. Returns the new memory id. Requires write scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| new_content | string | yes | Content of the new memory (the updated fact). |
| new_title | string | yes | Title of the new, now-valid memory. |
| target_id | string | yes | ID of the memory to supersede; get it via knowmind_recall - never invent it. |
| update_reason | string | – | Why it changed (e.g. 'address changed', 'contract renewed'); stored on the SUPERSEDES edge. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
knowmind_upload_document ~853
Ingest a longer text as one document into the tenant corpus: chunk splitting, embeddings, vector chunks and graph nodes. Upsert-by-title: if a document with the same title exists, the new version replaces the old one (server default). Use for long-form or multi-fact content (a report, a page, a doc); for a single short fact use knowmind_store_memory. Returns the document id and the number of chunks written. AFTER INGESTING: extract the facts the text states about people, organisations, projects, products, technologies and hosts, and create the corresponding edges via knowmind_link. Requires write scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| content | string | yes | Full document text (Markdown or plain); chunked and embedded server-side. |
| relations | array | – | Edges from this document to the things it talks about - set them HERE, in the same call. Name the counterpart in plain words; the server finds or creates its node and draws the edge. Allowed predicat… |
| source | string | – | Origin - URL or file path. Free text, stored for provenance. |
| title | string | – | Document title. Acts as the upsert key - an existing document with the same title is replaced. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the knowmind MCP server?
knowmind is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Schubeler-Consulting/knowmind. AI agent memory & knowledge graph, hosted in Germany (GDPR). Recall, relations, store via MCP. This page covers its npm package (knowmind).
Is the knowmind MCP server safe to use?
knowmind scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 2 known advisories against it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the knowmind MCP server expose?
knowmind exposes 13 tools: knowmind_recall, knowmind_health, knowmind_stats, knowmind_list_recent, knowmind_store_memory, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 4,087 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the knowmind MCP server still maintained?
knowmind is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the knowmind MCP server under?
knowmind declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.