Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SanctionsKit developer MCP

REMOTE · WWW.SANCTIONSKIT.COM

Sanctions API docs and request validation, with account-linked synthetic sandbox testing.

+3 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 86% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
  • 99% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Partial
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 4681 tokens (~37/item across 124 items; 9 tools + 115 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
  • Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes. Other categories moved too: Schema Quality & AI Usability fell 1.

  • 9 Oct 26 +2
    • Stability: unverified → 0.17 ▲ functional
  • 4 Oct 26 73

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.sanctionskit.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 19 Sept 2026 18 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 555838926b576d6ee43c292fe2eac924cb2
SANs: *.sanctionskit.com, sanctionskit.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.sanctionskit.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
sanctionskit.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; script-src-attr 'none'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://vercel.com/api/blob/ https://*.blob.vercel-storage.com; worker-src 'self' blob:; media-src 'self' blob:; manifest-src 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; form-action 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp
MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~460 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_api_schema ~68

Without path, list consumer REST operations. With a path such as /screenings and lowercase method, retrieve its OpenAPI request, response, examples and referenced schemas. Describes REST capabilities; MCP account tools are sandbox only.

NameTypeReqDescription
methodstring––
pathstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

get_doc ~43

Read a document returned by search_docs, including code examples and error handling. Uses a fixed local document catalog; does not fetch arbitrary URLs.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

get_profile ~25

Identify the sandbox profile represented by the authenticated connection. Takes no user or workspace selector.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
emailstring––
idstringyes–
namestring––
nicknamestring––

No examples provided.

get_screening_result ~48

Retrieve retained evidence by screening ID from the connected sandbox workspace. An expired result is an error. Preserve coverage, versions, warnings and potential-match review requirements.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

get_usage ~21

Read the connected sandbox workspace allowance, completed subjects and pending reservations.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

list_sources ~64

Read current source metadata and qualification from the connected sandbox workspace, with bounded pagination. Catalog/production source availability does not enable live MCP screenings; sandbox screening uses sandbox@1.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––
querystring––
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

run_sandbox_screening ~101

Submit invented data to sandbox@1. Requires synthetic=true and an idempotencyKey of 8–128 URL-safe characters, reused unchanged with the same request for retries. Retains screening evidence according to policy and may create a review case; consumes sandbox allowance, never paid production allowance. Cannot screen production or link counterparties.

NameTypeReqDescription
idempotencyKeystringyes–
requestobjectyes–
syntheticbooleanyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

search_docs ~45

Find current integration documentation and guides by keyword. Returns document slugs for get_doc. Public; no account needed.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
querystringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

validate_screening_request ~45

Validate request structure against the runtime REST screening schema without submitting or retaining it. Does not check live source eligibility or grant clearance. Use synthetic development inputs.

NameTypeReqDescription
request–yes–
NameTypeReqDescription
data–yes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SanctionsKit developer MCP server?

SanctionsKit developer MCP is a hosted endpoint at https://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.sanctionskit.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http sanctionskit-sanctionskit 'https://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the SanctionsKit developer MCP server?

SanctionsKit developer MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.SanctionsKit/sanctionskit. Sanctions API docs and request validation, with account-linked synthetic sandbox testing. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.sanctionskit.com/mcp).

Is the SanctionsKit developer MCP server safe to use?

SanctionsKit developer MCP scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SanctionsKit developer MCP server expose?

SanctionsKit developer MCP exposes 9 tools: search_docs, get_doc, get_api_schema, validate_screening_request, list_sources, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 460 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SanctionsKit developer MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SanctionsKit developer MCP without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SanctionsKit developer MCP server still maintained?

SanctionsKit developer MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.