Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

LMGram

REMOTE · API.LMGRAM.COM

Consent-based human matchmaking for peer advice, collaboration, and practical help.

Available components

0 this week 86 Trust /100

Last scanned (13 hours ago)

Scores higher than 93% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Communication

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security89
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
  • 50% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Partial
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 972 tokens (~51/item across 19 items; 17 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage74
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 10% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (65% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 3 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 18 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 2 Oct 26 86
    • Resource “LMGram conversation” now points somewhere else: ui://lmgram/conversation.v5.html → ui://lmgram/conversation.v6.html security
  • 1 Oct 26 0
    • New tool “panel_dismiss_suggestion”, which the server declares destructive security
    • Schema quality: 100% → 50% ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 31% → 10% ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 59 → 51 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: fail → pass ▲ functional
    • First check of Tool coverage: 65 functional
    • MCP protocol version: 2025-03-26 → 2026-07-28 functional
    • New resource “LMGram conversation” functional
    • New tool “open_lmgram_panel” functional
    • New tool “panel_chat” functional
    • New tool “panel_create_intent” functional
    • New tool “panel_join_group” functional
    • New tool “panel_mark_read” functional
    • New tool “panel_register_device” functional
    • New tool “panel_send_message” functional
    • New tool “panel_snapshot” functional
    • New tool “panel_start_chat” functional
    • New tool “panel_sync_device_keys” functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 1 Sept 26 0
    • HTTPS: fail → pass ▲ security
  • 28 Aug 26 0
    • Tool “list_match_requests” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “list_match_requests” added an optional parameter “status” cosmetic
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.lmgram.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=lmgram.com CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 7 Oct 2026 6 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5a019394ae443f581004cf850dd52a5e
SANs: lmgram.com, www.lmgram.com, partners.lmgram.com, app.lmgram.com, api.lmgram.com
CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.lmgram.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
lmgram.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.lmgram.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.lmgram.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Protected resource metadata

Document https://api.lmgram.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://api.lmgram.com/mcp
Authorisation server https://api.lmgram.com

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.lmgram.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.lmgram.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://api.lmgram.com:443/mcp
MCP tools · 17 exposed · ~947 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_current_user ~20

Returns the LMGram profile linked to the connected account.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_match_requests ~54

Lists recent match requests for the current LMGram user, optionally filtered by role and status.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
rolestring––
statusstring–Optional exact request status to return.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_messages ~44

Lists messages in a LMGram chat. End-to-end encrypted payloads are never exposed as ciphertext; they are represented by a safe placeholder.

NameTypeReqDescription
chatIdstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

open_lmgram_panel ~52

Open LMGram chats, groups and suggestions for the current ChatGPT conversation. Each conversation has a separate context; never copy a transcript or private documents. This does not publish an intent or send a message.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_chat ~45

Retrieve authorized chat data for client-side decryption, not model context.

NameTypeReqDescription
beforestring––
chatIdstringyes–
contextIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_create_intent ~75

Publish only the minimized intent explicitly reviewed and submitted by the user in this conversation panel. Do not include secrets, private transcripts, or dating requests.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–
languagestring––
needstringyes–
summarystringyes–
topicstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_dismiss_suggestion ~35

Decline an unopened match suggestion.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–
matchRequestIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_join_group ~35

Accept an existing group invitation related to this context.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–
roomIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_mark_read ~32

Mark the displayed chat as read.

NameTypeReqDescription
chatIdstringyes–
contextIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_register_device ~44

Register only a public encryption key for this user's panel.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–
deviceIdstringyes–
publicKeystringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_send_message ~97

Send a client-encrypted text message after the user presses Send. Retry only the identical payload and clientMessageId.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodystringyes–
chatIdstringyes–
clientMessageIdstringyes–
contextIdstringyes–
encryptedKeysobjectyes–
encryptionNoncestringyes–
encryptionSchemestringyes–
senderDeviceIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_snapshot ~24

Refresh this conversation's private panel data.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_start_chat ~42

Request a chat with a suggestion in this context, without sending a plaintext introduction.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–
matchRequestIdstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

panel_sync_device_keys ~66

Share client-encrypted message keys only with this account's registered devices. Does not send messages, plaintext or private keys.

NameTypeReqDescription
chatIdstringyes–
contextIdstringyes–
sourceDeviceIdstringyes–
updatesarrayyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
contextIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

request_human_match ~204

Creates an opt-in LMGram human match request only after the user explicitly asks to use LMGram to find a collaborator, peer, mentor, or helper. Never invoke for general advice, dating or romantic matchmaking. Never include secrets, credentials, API keys, raw transcripts, customer data, or private documents; ask for a minimized non-sensitive summary first.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring––
matchTypestring––
maxCandidatesinteger––
needstringyesThe concrete collaborator, peer, mentor, or helper the user explicitly wants. Dating and romantic matching are not supported.
sensitivitystring––
summarystringyesMinimized non-sensitive summary. Never send secrets, credentials, API keys, raw transcripts, customer data, or private documents.
topicstringyesShort, non-sensitive title for the practical or professional session topic. Dating and romantic requests are not supported.
urgencynumber––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

send_message ~32

Sends a message into a LMGram chat.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodystringyes–
chatIdstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

start_chat ~46

Starts a LMGram chat for a match request, or records that this side wants to chat.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodystring–Optional first message.
matchRequestIdstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the LMGram MCP server?

LMGram is a hosted endpoint at https://api.lmgram.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.lmgram.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http saezbaldo-lmgram 'https://api.lmgram.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the LMGram MCP server?

LMGram is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.saezbaldo/lmgram. Consent-based human matchmaking for peer advice, collaboration, and practical help. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.lmgram.com/mcp).

Is the LMGram MCP server safe to use?

LMGram scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the LMGram MCP server expose?

LMGram exposes 17 tools: get_current_user, request_human_match, list_match_requests, start_chat, list_messages, and 12 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 947 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the LMGram MCP server require authentication?

Yes. LMGram asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the LMGram MCP server still maintained?

LMGram is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.