ListingGood MCP
REMOTE · LISTINGGOOD.COM
Get recommended by Amazon's AI. Hosted MCP server for Amazon listing compliance & generation.
Available components
Last scanned (16 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 62% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 8 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1458 tokens (~182/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 23 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 4 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 3 Oct 26 73
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 29 Sept 26 0
- Stability: fail → pass ▲ security
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 24 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 8 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://listinggood.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.listinggood.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 20 Sept 2026 | 19 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 59a619b719afe8c5f99f2ecc3a113046ee2 |
| SANs: listinggood.com, www.listinggood.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of listinggood.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| listinggood.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://listinggood.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://listinggood.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://listinggood.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
agent_ready_check ~204
Score whether a product listing is Agent-Ready for AI shopping agents (ACP/UCP era). Platform-agnostic: works for Amazon, Shopify, Walmart, TikTok Shop or any storefront that AI shopping assistants may read. Use it when a user asks whether their product will be found, recommended, or auto-purchased by an AI agent. Fully local, deterministic rule engine — no API key, no credits, no network call. Returns four dimensions: structured attributes, entity clarity, trust & compliance, and agent actionability, plus ranked fixes. Args: text: raw product copy — title plus bullets/description (required). platform: amazon | shopify | walmart | tiktok | generic | auto (default auto-detected). lang: en or zh for the report language (default en).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| platform | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ai_readiness_check ~238
Score how likely Amazon's AI (Rufus, COSMO) is to recommend a listing. Free, deterministic, rule-based check on pasted listing copy (title, bullets, description). Returns a compliance health score, an AI-readability score, and a combined AI Recommendation Readiness Score (compliance * 0.55 + readability * 0.45) with actionable suggestions. Use this as a fast baseline BEFORE generating or editing a listing. Do NOT use it for a full compliance report - use compliance_scan for the deep knowledge-base audit. Free, read-only, no API key required, no credits deducted. Args: text: raw listing title + bullets + description (required). marketplace: marketplace code, US/DE/ES/FR/IT/JP/AE/SA/UK (default US). lang: zh or en (default en). email: optional lead email for a confirmation message and lead capture.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| string | – | – | |
| lang | string | – | – |
| marketplace | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
analyze_review ~157
Analyze a negative Amazon review for root cause and a suggested response (async; 2 credits). Extracts the underlying issue from a critical review and drafts a brand-appropriate response angle. Use this after a negative review appears, to decide how to reply. Do NOT use it to generate a listing or an appeal - use generate_listing or generate_poa for those. Read-only; deducts 2 credits; runs asynchronously, poll for the result. Args: text: the negative review text (required). marketplace: marketplace code (default US). lang: zh or en (default en).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| marketplace | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compliance_check ~153
Quick pre-publish compliance gate before generating a listing. Fast, free scan for obvious red-line words and category risks. Returns a shallow pass/fail-style result, not a full audit. Use this as a cheap pre-check right before generation. Do NOT use it for a complete risk report - use compliance_scan for the deep knowledge-base audit. Read-only; requires an API key; no credits deducted. Args: text: listing copy (required). lang: zh or en (default en). category: optional category hint, e.g. electronics or apparel.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | – |
| lang | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compliance_scan ~208
Deep knowledge-base compliance audit (async; 2 credits). Produces a thorough, written risk report covering prohibited words, IP, category mismatches, GPSR and more, backed by a private 15-year compliance knowledge base. Use this when you need a complete, actionable compliance report. Do NOT use it for a quick pre-publish check - use compliance_check for that. Read-only; deducts 2 credits; runs asynchronously, poll for the result. Args: text: listing title/bullets/description (required). marketplace: marketplace code (default US). category: optional category hint. lang: zh or en (default en). images: optional list of up to 5 data:image base64 strings, each < 4MB.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | – |
| images | array | – | – |
| lang | string | – | – |
| marketplace | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fill_from_sentence ~145
Expand a one-sentence product description into structured listing fields (free; API key; no credits). Turns casual, spoken product copy into structured fields (title, bullets, features) that feed the listing generator. Use this as a low-friction starting point when you only have a rough sentence. Do NOT use it to produce a final optimized listing - use generate_listing for that. Read-only; free; no credits deducted. Args: sentence: one-sentence product description, 4-1000 characters (required). lang: zh or en (default en).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| sentence | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_listing ~181
Generate a high-conversion Amazon listing - title + bullets + description (async; 1 credit per marketplace). Produces A9-optimized copy that respects per-marketplace character limits. Use this to create a full listing from product facts. Not free - deducts 1 credit per selected marketplace and runs asynchronously, poll for the result. Read-only: it drafts text and does not publish. Args: cn_name: product Chinese name (required). sku: product SKU (required). marketplaces: optional list of marketplace codes; defaults to all 9. price: optional product price. lang: zh or en (default en).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cn_name | string | yes | – |
| lang | string | – | – |
| marketplaces | array | – | – |
| price | string | – | – |
| sku | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_poa ~172
Draft a submission-ready Plan of Action (POA) from an Amazon violation notice (async; 4 credits). Converts a suspension or removal email into a structured POA appeal. Use this when a listing or account is suppressed. Not free - deducts 4 credits and runs asynchronously, poll for the result. Read-only: it drafts text and does not submit anything to Amazon. Args: text: violation notice or removal email text (required). marketplace: marketplace code (default US). lang: zh or en (default en). violation_type: optional, e.g. ip_complaint / authenticity / policy.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| marketplace | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
| violation_type | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ListingGood MCP server?
ListingGood MCP is a hosted endpoint at https://listinggood.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · listinggood.com
claude mcp add --transport http ryanyang828-listinggood 'https://listinggood.com/mcp'
What is the ListingGood MCP server?
ListingGood MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ryanyang828/listinggood. Get recommended by Amazon's AI. Hosted MCP server for Amazon listing compliance & generation. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://listinggood.com/mcp).
Is the ListingGood MCP server safe to use?
ListingGood MCP scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ListingGood MCP server expose?
ListingGood MCP exposes 8 tools: ai_readiness_check, agent_ready_check, compliance_check, compliance_scan, generate_poa, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,458 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ListingGood MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to ListingGood MCP without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ListingGood MCP server still maintained?
ListingGood MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.