Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies
REMOTE · COFOUNDERBASE.COM
Search 960+ evidence-checked AI automation agencies by need, tool, country and budget.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 58% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 801 tokens (~160/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage91
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 73% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “get_agency” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “request_intro” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_agencies” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 38% → 73% ▲ functional
- Server version: 1.0.1 → 1.1.0 functional
- New tool “match_agencies” functional
- “request_intro” added an optional parameter “agency_slug” cosmetic
- “request_intro” added an optional parameter “project_brief” cosmetic
- “request_intro” added an optional parameter “requester_email” cosmetic
- “request_intro” added an optional parameter “requester_name” cosmetic
- “search_agencies” added an optional parameter “city” cosmetic
- “search_agencies” added an optional parameter “service” cosmetic
- “search_agencies” added an optional parameter “verified_only” cosmetic
- “request_intro” reworded the description of “agency_slugs” cosmetic
- “request_intro” reworded the description of “brief” cosmetic
- “request_intro” reworded the description of “email” cosmetic
- “request_intro” reworded the description of “name” cosmetic
- “request_intro” made “agency_slugs” optional cosmetic
- “request_intro” made “brief” optional cosmetic
- “request_intro” made “email” optional cosmetic
- “request_intro” made “name” optional cosmetic
- 30 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 29 Oct 26 69
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=cofounderbase.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 23 Oct 2026 | 21 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 582f7169279d05b53344d570b9e9d0dd91b |
| SANs: cofounderbase.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of cofounderbase.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| cofounderbase.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=(), interest-cohort=(), browsing-topics=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_agency Get one agency profile ~63
Public Cofounderbase profile for one agency by slug (from search results): description, location, Verified flag, tools, use cases, industries, services, published prices, case studies, partner certifications and score. No contact details.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
match_agencies Match the best 5 agencies to a project ~119
Describe a project and get exactly the 5 best-fit agencies, each with a one-line reason. Verified agencies receive a ranking boost in this tool. Optional budget (USD) and location (city or country).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget | number|string | – | Max budget in USD, e.g. 5000 or "$5k" |
| location | string | – | City or country the agency should be based in |
| project_brief | string | yes | What needs to be built, e.g. "WhatsApp support bot for a Spanish e-commerce shop" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
request_intro Request an introduction ~216
Ask Cofounderbase to introduce the user to up to 5 agencies. Only call this when the user explicitly asks for an introduction and gives their own name and email. Required: requester_name, requester_email, project_brief (min 10 characters) and agency_slug or agency_slugs (legacy name/email/brief also accepted). A person reviews every request; the user gets one confirmation email.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency_slug | string | – | One agency slug |
| agency_slugs | array | – | Up to 5 agency slugs |
| brief | string | – | Legacy alias of project_brief |
| budget | string | – | – |
| company | string | – | – |
| string | – | Legacy alias of requester_email | |
| name | string | – | Legacy alias of requester_name |
| project_brief | string | – | What they need built |
| requester_email | string | – | The user's email, used only to make the intro |
| requester_name | string | – | The user's name |
| timeline | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_agencies Search AI automation agencies ~237
Search 960+ evidence-checked AI automation, internal-tools and AI-app agencies on Cofounderbase by a plain-English need. Optional filters: city, country, service, tool (e.g. n8n, Make, Zapier, Retool, Vapi), max starting budget in USD and verified_only. Returns ranked agencies with a reason for each match, a Verified flag and a profile link. Ranking here is by fit and score only; the Verified boost applies in match_agencies.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget | number | – | Max published starting price in USD |
| city | string | – | City, e.g. "Austin" |
| country | string | – | Country name, e.g. "United Kingdom" |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | What the buyer needs, e.g. "AI voice agent for a dental clinic" |
| service | string | – | Service, use case or platform keyword, e.g. "voice agents" |
| tool | string | – | Platform the agency should build with, e.g. "n8n" |
| verified_only | boolean | – | Only return Verified agencies |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
top_agencies Top agencies by category or country ~90
Highest-scored agencies on Cofounderbase for a use case (e.g. "Voice agents", "Chatbots", "RAG/knowledge base", "CRM automation/sync"), a tool (e.g. "n8n") and/or a country.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Use case, tool or industry |
| country | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server?
Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies is a hosted endpoint at https://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · cofounderbase.com
claude mcp add --transport http rupesh7128-cofounderbase 'https://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/'
What is the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server?
Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Rupesh7128/cofounderbase. Search 960+ evidence-checked AI automation agencies by need, tool, country and budget. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://cofounderbase.com/api/mcp/).
Is the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server safe to use?
Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server expose?
Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies exposes 5 tools: search_agencies, match_agencies, get_agency, top_agencies, request_intro. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 725 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server still maintained?
Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Cofounderbase: AI automation agencies, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.