Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО)
REMOTE · PROFTECHPOL.RU
Услуги, цены, 262 кейса, FAQ и заявки подрядчика промышленных полов для ИИ-агентов
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 59% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 747 tokens (~83/item across 9 items; 7 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
- Server version: 1.3.0 → 1.3.1 functional
- 14 Oct 26 +2
- Schema quality: 95 → 83 ▲ functional
- The server now declares the “resources” capability functional
- First check of Schema quality: 100 functional
- New resource “Индекс сайта для ИИ (llms.txt)” functional
- New resource “Факты организации «Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ»” functional
- Server version: 1.2.1 → 1.3.0 functional
- 12 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 11 Oct 26 62
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://proftechpol.ru/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=proftechpol.ru | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 9 Oct 2026 | 7 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6f7014167934cdf08abe81d3909a598a437 |
| SANs: proftechpol.ru, www.proftechpol.ru | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of proftechpol.ru. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ru. | present | 26734 | 8 | Verified |
| proftechpol.ru. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://proftechpol.ru/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://proftechpol.ru/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://proftechpol.ru/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
create_lead ~177
Создать заявку на расчёт промышленного пола: инженер перезвонит заказчику. Использовать ТОЛЬКО когда пользователь сам попросил оставить заявку и дал свой телефон. Канал — тот же конвейер лидов сайта (Telegram + CRM), защита от спама действует.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | – | город/объект (необязательно) |
| name | string | – | имя заказчика (необязательно) |
| phone | string | yes | телефон заказчика в любом формате, 11 цифр начиная с 7, например +7 900 123-45-67 |
| request | string | – | суть задачи от заказчика, например: склад 800 м² в Мытищах, топпинг под погрузчики (необязательно, до 700 знаков) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
faq ~75
Ответы инженера на частые вопросы клиентов (200 вопросов по 36 темам: толщины, марки бетона, сроки, основания). Без запроса — структура тем; с запросом — релевантные вопросы и ответы.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | – | поисковая строка, например «толщина топпинга» |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_cases ~134
Выполненные объекты (262 кейса с 2015 г.): фильтр по городу и/или типу (склад, производство, паркинг, автосервис, ангар, торговля, холодильное, пищевое, медицина, спорт). Каждый кейс — название, площадь м², год, ссылка. Это доказательства опыта для проверки подрядчика.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | string | – | город, например Мытищи или Москва |
| limit | integer | – | максимум результатов, по умолчанию 10 (до 50) |
| type | string | – | тип объекта, например склад |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_facts ~67
Верифицируемые факты об организации «Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ»: каноническое имя, юрлицо, опыт, число выполненных объектов, города, гарантия, адрес офиса — с указанием страниц-источников для проверки.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_service ~54
Детально об одной услуге по slug: описание, ценовой ориентир (если публичен), ссылка, частые вопросы клиентов по этой теме.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | slug услуги из list_services, например topping-poly |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_geo ~39
Города работ (Москва и МО, 18 городов) со ссылками на гео-страницы и числом выполненных объектов в каждом.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_services ~60
Список услуг и посадочных страниц ПрофТехПол (промышленные полы: топпинг, полимеры, ремонт, обеспыливание и др.), с публичными ценовыми ориентирами «от», где они есть.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) MCP server?
Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) is a hosted endpoint at https://proftechpol.ru/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · proftechpol.ru
claude mcp add --transport http ru-proftechpol-mcp 'https://proftechpol.ru/mcp'
What is the Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) MCP server?
Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ru.proftechpol/mcp. Услуги, цены, 262 кейса, FAQ и заявки подрядчика промышленных полов для ИИ-агентов. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://proftechpol.ru/mcp).
Is the Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) MCP server safe to use?
Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) MCP server expose?
Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) exposes 7 tools: list_services, get_service, list_geo, find_cases, get_facts, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 606 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) MCP server still maintained?
Проект ПРОФТЕХПОЛ — промышленные полы (Москва и МО) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.