Korean Notice (공고) Checklist
NPM · KOREAN-NOTICE-MCP
Compare Korean public notices (HWP/HWPX): changed eligibility, documents, deadlines, with evidence
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 61% of npm servers
Category Documents and Files
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security82
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects @modelcontextprotocol/server 2.1.0, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 1 of 15 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 39 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 254 tokens (~63/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage90
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 71% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 31 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 30 Oct 26 +1
- Security disclosure: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 29 Oct 26 −1
- Security disclosure: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 25 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 −5
- CVE-2026-111771 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-111770 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-111768 affects this package: high ▼ security
- Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/korean-notice-mcp@0.3.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 3 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 | CVE-2026-111768 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-jm63-cq47-j5jp | CVE-2026-111770 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pq | CVE-2026-111771 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 15 packages
| Packages resolved | 15 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_notices ~78
전년도와 올해 공고의 제출서류·신청기간 변화와 주요 변경 문구를 중요도 순으로, 양쪽 원문 근거와 함께 비교합니다.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after_path | string | yes | MCP_DATA_DIR 기준 상대 파일 경로 |
| before_path | string | yes | MCP_DATA_DIR 기준 상대 파일 경로 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
extract_requirements ~63
공고의 제출서류(필수/조건부)·신청기간·자격 후보와 원문 근거를 추출합니다. 결과는 검토가 필요합니다.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | MCP_DATA_DIR 기준 상대 파일 경로 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_evidence ~57
동일한 해시의 문서에서 위치에 해당하는 원문을 확인합니다.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| locator | string | yes | – |
| path | string | yes | MCP_DATA_DIR 기준 상대 파일 경로 |
| sha256 | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
read_notice ~56
공고문(TXT/MD/HWPX/HWP) 텍스트와 표를 원문 위치·해시와 함께 읽습니다. PDF 제외.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | MCP_DATA_DIR 기준 상대 파일 경로 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Korean Notice (공고) Checklist MCP server?
Korean Notice (공고) Checklist runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y korean-notice-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · korean-notice-mcp
claude mcp add rosieoh-korean-notice-mcp -- npx -y korean-notice-mcp
What is the Korean Notice (공고) Checklist MCP server?
Korean Notice (공고) Checklist is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.RosieOh/korean-notice-mcp. Compare Korean public notices (HWP/HWPX): changed eligibility, documents, deadlines, with evidence. This page covers its npm package (korean-notice-mcp).
Is the Korean Notice (공고) Checklist MCP server safe to use?
Korean Notice (공고) Checklist scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 3 known advisories against it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Korean Notice (공고) Checklist MCP server expose?
Korean Notice (공고) Checklist exposes 4 tools: read_notice, extract_requirements, compare_notices, get_evidence. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 254 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Korean Notice (공고) Checklist MCP server still maintained?
Korean Notice (공고) Checklist is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Korean Notice (공고) Checklist MCP server under?
Korean Notice (공고) Checklist declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.