Keep Me Secure
REMOTE · MCP.KEEPMESECURE.DEV · 2 COMPONENTS
Tells your coding agent whether your installed packages need patching, with advice on what to do.
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 52% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 377 tokens (~125/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage93
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 80% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (11)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (2)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 66
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.keepmesecure.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=keepmesecure.dev | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 5 Nov 2026 | 3 Feb 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 5e9140057e69625813094c55dbace5d6 |
| SANs: keepmesecure.dev, mcp.keepmesecure.dev, *.mcp.keepmesecure.dev | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.keepmesecure.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | DS published | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| keepmesecure.dev. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.keepmesecure.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.keepmesecure.dev/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_package Is this package version safe? ~77
Checks one exact package version against public security advisories.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ecosystem | string | yes | php, npm, python, go, rust, ruby, java or dotnet |
| name | string | yes | Package name, such as guzzlehttp/guzzle |
| version | string | yes | Exact version, such as 7.4.0 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_packages Is my stack secure? ~109
Use for questions like 'is my stack secure?' or 'do we have vulnerable packages?'. Checks a list of exact installed package versions against public security advisories. Read them from the project's lockfiles, including transitive packages. Up to 500 per call; call again for more. verdict is yes, no or unknown; unknown means the check was incomplete, so never report it as safe. Does not cover language runtimes, OS packages or Docker base images.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| packages | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_platform Has this platform been breached? ~83
Lists known security incidents at hosting, deployment and AI platforms, with what to do and a link to the source. Use when the user asks about a platform or breach. Omit name to list all. The list is curated and not complete, so no result doesn't mean a platform is safe.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | – | Platform name, such as railway or vercel |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Keep Me Secure MCP server?
Keep Me Secure is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.keepmesecure.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.keepmesecure.dev
claude mcp add --transport http robertkeus-keep-me-secure-mcp 'https://mcp.keepmesecure.dev/mcp'
What is the Keep Me Secure MCP server?
Keep Me Secure is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.robertkeus/keep-me-secure-mcp. Tells your coding agent whether your installed packages need patching, with advice on what to do. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.keepmesecure.dev/mcp).
Is the Keep Me Secure MCP server safe to use?
Keep Me Secure scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Keep Me Secure MCP server expose?
Keep Me Secure exposes 3 tools: check_packages, check_platform, check_package. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 269 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Keep Me Secure MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Keep Me Secure without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Keep Me Secure MCP server still maintained?
Keep Me Secure is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Keep Me Secure MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 11 checks on Keep Me Secure, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 7 more. 2 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Keep Me Secure: HTTPS and Stability. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.