NDIS Provider Review Directory
REMOTE · NDISPROVIDER.REVIEW
Find Australian NDIS providers by service and location, with public profiles and links.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 69% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Health and Science
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 552 tokens (~184/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +8
- HTTPS: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 27 Oct 26 66
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ndisprovider.review/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=ndisprovider.review | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 2 Nov 2026 | 31 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 4c2f148231573e9f0e327d131a4852d9 |
| SANs: ndisprovider.review, admin.ndisprovider.review, *.admin.ndisprovider.review | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of ndisprovider.review. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| review. | present | 55054 | 8 | Verified |
| ndisprovider.review. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=86400 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://ndisprovider.review/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://ndisprovider.review/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://ndisprovider.review/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_ndis_provider Read an NDIS provider listing ~106
Use this to read a public provider profile after search, using its returned slug ID. Returns available contact details, broad service category IDs, locations, update timestamps and a citation URL. Missing data is unknown. Do not treat registration status as a live official verification or a claimed profile as accreditation. Cannot book or contact providers.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Exact provider slug ID returned by search_ndis_providers, e.g. 101-physio. Never supply a URL. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limitations | string | yes | – |
| provider | object | yes | – |
| retrieved_at | string | yes | – |
| source_url | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_ndis_services List NDIS provider service categories ~67
Use this when mapping a requested NDIS support to directory service categories before searching. Returns category IDs, names, synonyms and source links. Therapy services is a broad category, not proof that a provider offers a specific therapy. Do not use for NDIS billing item codes or funding advice.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| services | array | yes | – |
| source_url | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_ndis_providers Find an NDIS provider ~296
Use this when someone wants to find or compare Australian NDIS providers by support category, state, city, suburb, postcode or name. Returns up to 20 public listings per page, registration status, available review data and citation URLs, ordered by name. Ask for service or location if missing. Do not use for diagnosis, funding eligibility, emergency help, booking or sending enquiries.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accepting_only | boolean | – | Only claimed listings reporting they accept participants; not a live vacancy guarantee. |
| city | string | – | City name, e.g. Melbourne. Matches directory outlet locations, not a distance radius. |
| language | string | – | Exact language label, e.g. Arabic. Missing language data does not imply the service is unavailable. |
| page | integer | – | Page of up to 20 matches. Use next_page from the last response. |
| query | string | – | Provider name, ABN, or postcode, e.g. 3000. Use service_ids for service categories. |
| registered_only | boolean | – | Defaults to NDIS registered listings. False includes other directory registration statuses. |
| service_ids | array | – | Directory category IDs returned by list_ndis_services. Multiple IDs require all categories; these are not NDIS billing item codes. |
| state | string | – | Australian state or territory abbreviation. |
| suburb | string | – | Suburb name, e.g. Richmond; specify state to disambiguate. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limitations | string | yes | – |
| next_page | – | yes | – |
| page | integer | yes | – |
| providers | array | yes | – |
| retrieved_at | string | yes | – |
| source_url | string | yes | – |
| total | integer | yes | – |
| total_pages | integer | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the NDIS Provider Review Directory MCP server?
NDIS Provider Review Directory is a hosted endpoint at https://ndisprovider.review/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · ndisprovider.review
claude mcp add --transport http review-ndisprovider-find-an-ndis-provider 'https://ndisprovider.review/mcp'
What is the NDIS Provider Review Directory MCP server?
NDIS Provider Review Directory is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as review.ndisprovider/find-an-ndis-provider. Find Australian NDIS providers by service and location, with public profiles and links. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ndisprovider.review/mcp).
Is the NDIS Provider Review Directory MCP server safe to use?
NDIS Provider Review Directory scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the NDIS Provider Review Directory MCP server expose?
NDIS Provider Review Directory exposes 3 tools: list_ndis_services, search_ndis_providers, get_ndis_provider. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 469 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the NDIS Provider Review Directory MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to NDIS Provider Review Directory without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the NDIS Provider Review Directory MCP server still maintained?
NDIS Provider Review Directory is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.