ContextSmith
PYPI · CONTEXTSMITH
Give your coding agent the right code: graph + hybrid search, packed into a token budget. Local.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 80% of PyPI servers
Category Code Search and Documentation
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 4 of 44 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to RahulSankhla312/contextsmith). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 10 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 481 tokens (~48/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
- Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 76
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/contextsmith@0.1.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | RahulSankhla312/contextsmith |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/RahulSankhla312/contextsmith/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.1 |
| Rekor log index | 3458854296 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:71e55098ee78f75d38343a7479708060cfd3823cb03fc36fda572a4d26a534b5 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 44 packages
| Packages resolved | 44 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 3 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
add_note ~46
Remember a decision, invariant or gotcha, optionally pinned to a file or symbol.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | – | – |
| symbol | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
callees ~29
Functions that `name` calls.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
callers ~27
Functions that call `name`.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
find_symbol ~35
Where a function, class or method is defined (by name or qualified name), with its signature.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_context ~97
The most relevant code for a task, packed into at most `budget_tokens` tokens. Pass the task in plain words (a bug report, a feature request, a stack trace). Files are ranked by full-text match, meaning (local embeddings), names and paths the task mentions and git history; function bodies and outlines are then fitted into the budget.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget_tokens | integer | – | – |
| task | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
impact ~64
Everything that transitively calls `name`: what a change to it could break. One line per caller, `depth path:lines name (kind)`, nearest first.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| depth | integer | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
overview ~21
Repository summary: languages, size, most central and most changed files.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
reindex ~18
Re-index changed files (incremental and fast).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
related_files ~34
Files linked to `path` by imports/calls, and files that historically change with it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search ~45
Ranked symbols (functions, classes, methods) matching a query, as `path:lines name (kind)`.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the ContextSmith MCP server?
ContextSmith runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx contextsmith. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · contextsmith
claude mcp add rahulsankhla312-contextsmith -- uvx contextsmith
What is the ContextSmith MCP server?
ContextSmith is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.RahulSankhla312/contextsmith. Give your coding agent the right code: graph + hybrid search, packed into a token budget. Local. This page covers its PyPI package (contextsmith).
Is the ContextSmith MCP server safe to use?
ContextSmith scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ContextSmith MCP server expose?
ContextSmith exposes 10 tools: get_context, search, find_symbol, callers, callees, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 416 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the ContextSmith MCP server still maintained?
ContextSmith is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the ContextSmith MCP server under?
ContextSmith declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.