Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

DocGuard

NPM · DOCGUARD-CLI · SCANNED SEP 20

Deterministic doc-drift detection: guard, score, explain, verify-claims and diagnose MCP tools.

Available components

0 this week 94 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 0 of 4 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to raccioly/docguard). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 603 tokens (~86/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
  • Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the DocGuard MCP server?

DocGuard runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y docguard-cli. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · docguard-cli

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add raccioly-docguard -- npx -y docguard-cli
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "raccioly-docguard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "docguard-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "raccioly-docguard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "docguard-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add raccioly-docguard -- npx -y docguard-cli
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "raccioly-docguard": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "docguard-cli"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add raccioly-docguard --command npx --arg -y --arg docguard-cli
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  raccioly-docguard:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "docguard-cli"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "raccioly-docguard": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "docguard-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add raccioly-docguard -t stdio -c npx -a -y docguard-cli
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "raccioly-docguard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "docguard-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 19 Sept 26 −2
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 18 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 17 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 +11
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass security
    • Dependency health: unverified → 1.00 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.87 → unverified security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified security
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass security
    • Schema quality: 515 → 603 functional
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified functional
    • Dependency health: unverified → 1.00 functional
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Package version: 0.37.1 → 0.40.5 functional
    • Package version: 0.37.1 → 0.40.0 functional
  • 14 Sept 26 −10
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified security
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified security
    • Stability: 0.83 → unverified security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified security
    • Dependency health: 1.00 → unverified functional
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified functional
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Package version: 0.36.1 → 0.37.1 functional
    • Package version: 0.36.1 → 0.36.2 functional
  • 13 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 12 Sept 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/docguard-cli@0.40.5

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo raccioly/docguard
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/raccioly/docguard/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 2839105235
Predicate type https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:7220564a6ca0d744a927723432ffbe1c966ed10620150122c66c766b1c3ca26f853771a19f03fa87fe3b371dd83435251e88d61ac6f370d6d17c973b0

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 4 packages
Packages resolved 4
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~603 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
docguard_diagnose ~80

Run guard and return only what needs fixing: failing/warning validators with their messages, structured findings, and suggested next actions — shaped for an agent to act on.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectDirstringPath to the project to inspect (absolute, or relative to the server's working directory). Defaults to the working directory the server was started in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docguard_explain ~78

Explain a stable DocGuard finding code (e.g. STR001, ENV003): what it means, which validator emits it, and the inline suppression to use if it's a confirmed false positive.

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyesThe finding code guard prints next to each finding, e.g. STR001 or ENV003. Case-insensitive.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docguard_guard ~97

Run every enabled DocGuard validator against the project's canonical docs. Returns the full guard JSON contract: status (PASS/WARN/FAIL), structured findings with stable codes and suggestions, nextStep, doc coverage map, semantic-claim count, and per-validator results.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectDirstringPath to the project to inspect (absolute, or relative to the server's working directory). Defaults to the working directory the server was started in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docguard_report ~106

Generate the commit-stamped compliance-evidence bundle: guard verdict per validator, findings grouped by stable code, CDD score, ALCOA+ data-integrity attributes, fix history, and a tamper-evident sha256 integrity hash. Evidence, not a gate — it reports state without failing.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectDirstringPath to the project to inspect (absolute, or relative to the server's working directory). Defaults to the working directory the server was started in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docguard_score ~65

Compute the project's CDD maturity score (0-100) with letter grade and per-category breakdown.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectDirstringPath to the project to inspect (absolute, or relative to the server's working directory). Defaults to the working directory the server was started in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docguard_verify_claims ~89

Extract the semantic claims in the project's canonical docs — documented numbers, limits, and enums — as a verification task list. Deterministic discovery, LLM judgment — the caller verifies each claim against the code.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectDirstringPath to the project to inspect (absolute, or relative to the server's working directory). Defaults to the working directory the server was started in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

docguard_verify_evidence ~88

Evaluate `.docguard-evidence.json` against bounded local sources. Returns explicit verified-within-scope, contradicted, stale, inconclusive, and unsupported states; verification applies only to each selected statement.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectDirstringPath to the project to inspect (absolute, or relative to the server's working directory). Defaults to the working directory the server was started in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the DocGuard MCP server?

DocGuard is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.raccioly/docguard. Deterministic doc-drift detection: guard, score, explain, verify-claims and diagnose MCP tools. This page covers its npm package (docguard-cli).

Is the DocGuard MCP server safe to use?

DocGuard scores 94 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the DocGuard MCP server expose?

DocGuard exposes 7 tools: docguard_guard, docguard_score, docguard_explain, docguard_verify_evidence, docguard_verify_claims, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 603 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the DocGuard MCP server still maintained?

DocGuard is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the DocGuard MCP server under?

DocGuard declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.