Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility

REMOTE · GAIZKAJIMENEZ.COM

Basque Country hyperlocal mobility: ES/EU semantic search, routing, open-data POIs, peak-bagging.

0 this week 25 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 10% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Maps and Location

Recent critical change

TLS certificate (13 Aug 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 18 Aug 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • TLS certificate: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but the endpoint redirected instead of responding directly. security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the whole tool list to see what that exposes. security
    • Score status: failed → scored ▲ functional
  • 13 Aug 26 0
    • TLS certificate: pass → fail ▼ critical
    • Score status: scored → failed ▼ critical
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.57 → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 7 Aug 26 0
    • The server no longer declares the “experimental” capability functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=gaizkajimenez.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 17 Oct 2026 15 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 556a940332cd1c4e1a81fae9c6fa42595fa
SANs: gaizkajimenez.com, www.gaizkajimenez.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of gaizkajimenez.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
gaizkajimenez.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive
HTTP status 308
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp Redirected 308 https://www.gaizkajimenez.com/mcp
http (plaintext) http://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~615 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
explain_place ~87

Contexto de un punto: barrio/municipio y servicios cercanos (rail, bus, aseos…) con distancias. · Puntu baten testuingurua: auzoa eta zerbitzu hurbilak. · What's around a point: neighborhood and nearby services with distances.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

nearby_pois ~147

POIs más cercanos de una capa concreta. Capas: fountains (fuentes), toilets (aseos), parking, bikepark (aparcabicis), defib (DEA), beaches (playas), ev (cargadores), cameras, fuel (gasolineras), peaks (cimas), metro, euskotren, cercanias, bilbobus, bizkaibus. · Geruza bateko POI hurbilenak. · Nearest POIs of a given layer.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
layerstringyes–
limitinteger––
lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

plan_hike ~152

El monte en transporte público: cimas de Euskadi (2.825, OSM) alcanzables por transporte — para cada candidata, su parada/estación más cercana entre 9 redes. · Mendia garraio publikoz: tontor iritsgarriak. · Peak-bagging by public transport. HONESTO: distancias en línea recta, no ruta a pie; usa plan_route hasta la parada para el trayecto real.

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–
max_resultsinteger––
max_stop_dist_minteger––
min_ele_minteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

plan_route ~112

Ruta real entre dos puntos con la infraestructura propia de emap (OSRM/OTP). mode: transit | walk | bike | car. · Bi punturen arteko ibilbidea. · Real route between two points. Devuelve duración, distancia y tramos (sin geometría completa).

NameTypeReqDescription
from_latnumberyes–
from_lonnumberyes–
modestring––
to_latnumberyes–
to_lonnumberyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_places ~117

Búsqueda semántica local en español o euskera ("dónde beber agua", "haurra aldatzeko lekua"). · Bilaketa semantikoa gaztelaniaz edo euskaraz. · Semantic local search in Spanish or Basque. Devuelve POIs cercanos al punto (lat, lon) o abstención honesta si no entiende la consulta.

NameTypeReqDescription
kinteger––
latnumberyes–
lonnumberyes–
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility MCP server?

emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility is a hosted endpoint at https://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · gaizkajimenez.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http r3tr0eth-emap 'https://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility MCP server?

emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.r3tr0eth/emap. Basque Country hyperlocal mobility: ES/EU semantic search, routing, open-data POIs, peak-bagging. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://gaizkajimenez.com/mcp).

Is the emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility MCP server safe to use?

emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility scores 25 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility MCP server expose?

emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility exposes 5 tools: search_places, nearby_pois, explain_place, plan_route, plan_hike. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 615 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility MCP server still maintained?

emap — Euskadi hyperlocal mobility is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.