Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp

NPM · TITAN-EMAIL-MCP

MCP server for Titan Email (IMAP/SMTP), tested and confirmed with GoDaddy mailboxes.

Available components

−1 this week 64 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 37% of npm servers

Category Communication

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 36 of 136 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 654 tokens (~65/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage78
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 35% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "send_email" implies "send" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 24 Oct 26 −5
    • CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +3
    • Stability: unverified → 0.27 ▲ functional
  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Supply Chain Security went from 98 to 99.

  • 14 Oct 26 +26
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: fail functional
    • First check of Schema quality: fair functional
    • First check of Tool coverage: 35 functional
    • First check of Destructive annotations: 0 functional
    • First check of Schema quality: pass functional
  • 12 Oct 26 38

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Analysed npm/titan-email-mcp@1.0.5

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 1 finding
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 CVE-2023-54404 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 136 packages
Packages resolved 136
Stale 36
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~654 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
list_emails ~57

List the most recent emails in a folder (newest first).

NameTypeReqDescription
folderstring–Mailbox path, e.g. INBOX, Sent, Archive
limitinteger––
unread_onlyboolean––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_folders ~19

List all mailbox folders with message and unread counts.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

move_email ~56

Move emails to another folder (e.g. Archive, Trash).

NameTypeReqDescription
destinationstringyes–
folderstring–Mailbox path, e.g. INBOX, Sent, Archive
uidsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

read_email ~67

Read a full email by UID: headers, plain-text body and attachment list.

NameTypeReqDescription
folderstring–Mailbox path, e.g. INBOX, Sent, Archive
mark_readboolean––
max_charsinteger––
uidintegeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

reply_email ~83

Reply to an email by UID, threading it correctly. Set reply_all to include all recipients.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodystringyes–
draft_onlyboolean–Save as draft instead of sending
folderstring–Mailbox path, e.g. INBOX, Sent, Archive
reply_allboolean––
uidintegeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

save_draft ~70

Save an email to the Drafts folder without sending it.

NameTypeReqDescription
bccarray––
bodystringyesPlain-text body
ccarray––
htmlstring–Optional HTML body
subjectstringyes–
toarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_emails ~117

Search a folder by sender, recipient, subject, body text, date range or read state.

NameTypeReqDescription
beforestring–ISO date, exclusive
folderstring–Mailbox path, e.g. INBOX, Sent, Archive
fromstring––
limitinteger––
sincestring–ISO date, inclusive
subjectstring––
textstring–Matches headers or body
tostring––
unread_onlyboolean––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

send_email ~75

Send a new email from the Titan account. A copy is saved to the Sent folder.

NameTypeReqDescription
bccarray––
bodystringyesPlain-text body
ccarray––
htmlstring–Optional HTML body
subjectstringyes–
toarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

set_flags ~61

Mark emails read/unread and flagged/unflagged.

NameTypeReqDescription
flaggedboolean––
folderstring–Mailbox path, e.g. INBOX, Sent, Archive
readboolean––
uidsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

test_connection ~49

Verify IMAP and SMTP login against the configured Titan (or GoDaddy-hosted Titan) account. Run this first after setup — it touches no mail, it only confirms the credentials and host settings work.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp server?

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y titan-email-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · titan-email-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add qmmughal-titan-email-mcp -- npx -y titan-email-mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp server?

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp. MCP server for Titan Email (IMAP/SMTP), tested and confirmed with GoDaddy mailboxes. This page covers its npm package (titan-email-mcp).

Is the io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 24 October 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp server expose?

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp exposes 10 tools: test_connection, list_folders, list_emails, search_emails, read_email, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 654 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp server under?

io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.