Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP
NPM · @PUTERVISION/AGENT-REASONING-MCP · SCANNED SEP 25
Strategic BDI reasoning engine for autonomous AI agents — goals, utility, and replanning.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security96
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 24 of 38 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (1 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 9 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1600 tokens (~76/item across 21 items; 10 tools + 11 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP server?
Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp
claude mcp add putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp -- npx -y @putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp -- npx -y @putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg @putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp
mcp_servers:
putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y @putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"putervision-agent-reasoning-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +16
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 16 Sept 26 −12
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Dependency health: 0.81 → 0.68 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 900 → 1600 ▼ functional
- MCP protocol: pass → fail ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 0% → 100% ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.20 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: fair → good functional
- Package version: 0.1.2 → 0.2.1 functional
- 12 Sept 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 10 Sept 26 52
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp@0.2.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 38 packages
| Packages resolved | 38 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 1 |
| Stale | 23 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
assess_risk ~94
Compute quantitative risk and threat assessment for candidate actions or plans against active utility weights.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Risk assessment mode |
| candidate_action | string | – | Action name to evaluate |
| candidate_actions | array | – | Multiple actions to compare risk scores |
| parameters | object | – | Action parameters |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| situation_context | object | – | Current environment telemetry & vitals |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
evaluate_situation ~179
Ingest multi-modal situation snapshot, compute expected utilities against active weights, and output prioritized action recommendations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Snapshot evaluation mode or quick text context |
| candidate_actions | array | – | Candidate actions to score and rank |
| lookahead_depth | number | – | Bounded heuristic lookahead plies (e.g. 2-3 plies, discount gamma=0.85) |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| quick_context | string | – | Text summary of current situation for quick evaluation |
| session_id | string | – | Linked state-memory session ID |
| snapshot | object | – | Normalized SituationSnapshot with world, vision, state, and vitals |
| trace_id | string | – | Distributed trace ID |
| utility_profile | string | – | Named utility profile to score against (defaults to active) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_decision_trace ~92
Retrieve explainable step-by-step chain-of-thought rationale, candidate utilities, and risk assessment for past decisions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Trace retrieval operation |
| goal_id | string | – | Filter traces by linked goal ID |
| limit | number | – | Max traces to list |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| trace_id | string | – | Trace ID for get/explain action |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
manage_beliefs ~195
Maintain structured belief state with TTL expiration sweeps, exponential confidence decay, and category filtering.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Belief operation |
| belief_id | string | – | Belief ID for specific lookup |
| category | string | – | Belief category |
| client_request_id | string | – | Idempotency key |
| confidence | number | – | Confidence score (0.0 to 1.0) |
| decay_rate | number | – | Exponential decay rate lambda per hour |
| expires_at | string | – | ISO-8601 expiration timestamp |
| object | – | – | Belief value / state payload |
| predicate | string | – | Predicate relationship (e.g. "is_locked", "status") |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| source | string | – | Belief provenance source |
| subject | string | – | Belief subject (e.g. "north_gate", "enemy_patrol") |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
manage_intentions ~205
Queue, dispatch, track, and resolve behavior directives (wire contract) for behavior-mcp.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| abort_conditions | array | – | Auto-abort trigger conditions |
| action | string | yes | Intention operation |
| behavior_name | string | – | Target behavior tree name (e.g. "combat_kite", "gather_loop") |
| client_request_id | string | – | Idempotency key |
| deadline_at | string | – | ISO-8601 completion deadline |
| goal_id | string | – | Linked goal ID |
| intention_id | string | – | Intention ID for dispatch/get/cancel/resolve |
| parameters | object | – | Runtime behavior parameters |
| priority | number | – | Execution priority (0.0 to 1.0) |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| result | object | – | Outcome payload for resolve action |
| status | string | – | Status filter or update |
| trace_id | string | – | Linked decision trace ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
manage_reasoning_db ~86
Database maintenance, stats, SHA-256 Merkle audit verification, checkpoints save/restore, and diffs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Database maintenance operation: stats, audit, doctor (health diagnostics), snapshot, diff, restore |
| description | string | – | Description for snapshot |
| name | string | – | Snapshot name |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
query_knowledge ~90
Search learned heuristic patterns, tactics, and past decision traces by context similarity.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Knowledge query mode |
| context_tags | array | – | Filter by context tags |
| limit | number | – | Max patterns to return |
| pattern_type | string | – | Filter by pattern category |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| query | string | – | Semantic search query string |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
replan ~105
Regenerate sub-task DAG and abort/recreate intentions upon unexpected blockers or environmental state changes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Replanning trigger type |
| blocker_description | string | – | Description of the obstacle or blocker encountered |
| goal_id | string | yes | ID of goal to replan |
| preserve_completed | boolean | – | Whether to preserve already completed subgoals |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| trigger_event | string | – | Event description triggering replanning |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
set_goal ~241
Register, update, decompose, or manage hierarchical goals and task DAGs in the reasoning engine.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | The goal management operation to perform |
| client_request_id | string | – | Idempotency key to prevent duplicate creation |
| deadline_at | string | – | ISO-8601 deadline timestamp |
| description | string | – | Detailed goal description |
| id | string | – | Goal ID (required for update, get, abandon) |
| limit | number | – | Max items to return for list action |
| parent_id | string | – | Parent goal ID for hierarchical sub-goals |
| priority | number | – | Goal priority (0.0 to 1.0) |
| progress | number | – | Completion progress (0.0 to 1.0) |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| status | string | – | Goal status |
| subgoals | array | – | Array of sub-goals for decompose action |
| success_criteria | array | – | List of verifiable conditions |
| title | string | – | Goal title or objective summary |
| utility_weights | object | – | Goal-specific utility weight overrides |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
set_utility_weights ~120
Configure and activate multi-attribute utility weights (aggression, caution, greed, exploration, cooperation).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | Profile operation |
| description | string | – | Profile description |
| is_active | boolean | – | Whether to set as currently active profile |
| name | string | – | Profile name (e.g. "aggressive", "cautious", "explorer") |
| project | string | – | Target project slug |
| weights | object | – | Key-value map of weight values (0.0 to 1.0) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP server?
Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp. Strategic BDI reasoning engine for autonomous AI agents, goals, utility, and replanning. This page covers its npm package (@putervision/agent-reasoning-mcp).
Is the Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP server safe to use?
Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 25 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP server expose?
Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP exposes 10 tools: set_goal, evaluate_situation, replan, assess_risk, query_knowledge, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,407 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP server still maintained?
Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP server under?
Strategic Agent Reasoning MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.