Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Kawal

REMOTE · KAWAL-THREE.VERCEL.APP

Evidence about ERC-8004 agents on BNB Smart Chain, gathered by calling them. No key.

0 this week 89 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 96% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1627 tokens (~135/item across 12 items; 9 tools + 3 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 30 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 1 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 31 Aug 26 0

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.vercel.app CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 31 Oct 2026 29 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 9c5f0e6a35c955e113044c86848e4cd5
SANs: *.vercel.app
CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of kawal-three.vercel.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. DS published 23684 8 Verified
vercel.app. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-MWVkN2YzMjYtMzg3MS00MjMzLWJiNjktMGZkOTZmNjRmMTc4' 'strict-dynamic'; style-src 'self' 'nonce-MWVkN2YzMjYtMzg3MS00MjMzLWJiNjktMGZkOTZmNjRmMTc4'; style-src-attr 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' blob: data: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp
MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~1,353 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
agents_by_owner ~146

List the agents one wallet registered on BSC and call each of their declared endpoints now. Nothing on the chain tells an owner their endpoint went dark — the registry keeps listing it — so this is the answer to "is my agent still answering?": what answered, how each failure looks, and every probe Kawal kept. At most 12 agents are dialled, so a large owner sees the first page.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
ownerstringyesThe wallet that minted the registrations: 0x followed by forty hex characters. `address` is accepted as an alias.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_payment ~117

Send the opening request of the x402 protocol — no payment header — and report whether the server actually demands payment. `x402_supported` on the registry is a flag a registration sets about itself; this is the answer to asking. Kawal never settles a payment, so the price is quoted in the server's own words and nothing moves.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
tokenIdstringyesERC-8004 token id, decimal digits.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_agents ~120

Put two or three agents side by side and answer the same questions of each — the ones a buyer weighs before handing over a spend cap: can it be hired, does it answer right now, has it kept answering, what does it offer, what does it say it costs, does its domain verify, what is its track record, what is flagged against it, and when it was registered. Each agent is dialled for this call. No combined score: the disagreements are the point.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentsarrayyesOne to 3 agents to compare.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

deep_report ~202

Everything Kawal holds about one agent in a single answer: the live handshake, the full probe history, how the endpoint fails when it fails, whether it really charges, and who wrote its feedback. This one costs money. Kawal measured that 75 of 200 BSC registrations declare x402 support and that none of the reachable ones ever asks to be paid; this is the counter-example. Calling it without payment returns the terms rather than the report. Pay the terms with a plain BNB transfer and call again with `txHash`; the receipt is read on-chain and spent once.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
tokenIdstringyesERC-8004 token id, decimal digits.
txHashstring–Hash of the BNB transfer that paid the terms: 0x followed by 64 hex characters. Omit to receive the terms.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_agents ~217

Search the BSC roster by describing the problem rather than naming a product, and get back agents ranked with Kawal's evidence attached. Duplicate registrations are collapsed: roughly two thirds of the newest registrations are copies of a template, and returning all of them would be returning the same agent many times. With `trending`, the list is instead what 8004scan's visitors looked at most over that window — attention, not evidence — each entry carrying the tier Kawal's own record gives it, which is where the two disagree.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
limitnumber–How many to return, at most 20.
querystring–What you need done, in plain words. Optional when `trending` is given; then it filters the trending list by name or description.
trendingstring–Return 8004scan's trending agents for this window instead of a search, in the registry's order.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

plan_mandate ~175

Turn a capital amount and a duration into the four scoped sessions Kawal would grant on Altana — one per seat, each with its own contract allowlist, spend cap and expiry — without granting anything. Pure arithmetic over the venue table: the same plan the mandate form shows, and the same refusals, since a plan that would widen authority (an unproven venue, an empty allowlist, caps that overcommit) is refused rather than built.

NameTypeReqDescription
capitalUsdtnumberyesCapital to entrust, in USDT. Positive, at most 1000000000000.
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
daysintegeryesHow long the mandate runs, in whole days. 1 to 365.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

read_reputation ~135

Report who wrote an agent's ERC-8004 feedback, not how much of it there is. A sample of 1,200 BSC records came from 53 addresses, one of which wrote 265 of the oldest 600, so a count of records is a count of writes rather than of opinions. Returns how many carry a mark, how many distinct addresses wrote them, and what share came from the busiest one.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
tokenIdstringyesERC-8004 token id, decimal digits.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

uptime_history ~123

Read the history Kawal keeps of one agent's endpoint without dialling it: how many times it was called, how many times it answered in the protocol it declared, since when, and the median and worst latency of the answering calls. This is the record the registry does not have. Null when Kawal has never called this endpoint; verify_agent makes the first call.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
tokenIdstringyesERC-8004 token id, decimal digits.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_agent ~118

Call an agent's declared endpoint right now and report what answered. This is a live handshake made by Kawal, not a reading of the registry: an agent whose registration declares MCP but whose endpoint is gone is reported as not answering. Returns the hireability tier and the evidence behind it, including how many times Kawal has reached this endpoint before.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainIdnumber–Chain id. One of 56, 97. Defaults to 56.
tokenIdstringyesERC-8004 token id, decimal digits.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Kawal MCP server?

Kawal is a hosted endpoint at https://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · kawal-three.vercel.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http pugarhuda-kawal 'https://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Kawal MCP server?

Kawal is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.PugarHuda/kawal. Evidence about ERC-8004 agents on BNB Smart Chain, gathered by calling them. No key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://kawal-three.vercel.app/api/mcp).

Is the Kawal MCP server safe to use?

Kawal scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Kawal MCP server expose?

Kawal exposes 9 tools: verify_agent, check_payment, read_reputation, find_agents, agents_by_owner, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,353 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Kawal MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Kawal without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Kawal MCP server still maintained?

Kawal is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Kawal MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Kawal, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.