repofit
PYPI · REPOFIT
Find GitHub projects that fit you, using what your coding agents already know about you.
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 55% of PyPI servers
Category Code Search and Documentation
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security50
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 637 tokens (~63/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage87
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 60% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 51
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/repofit@0.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_repo Check one repository ~58
Judge whether one GitHub repository fits the user: its facts, whether they already use it, and which profile entries it matches. Looks the repo up on GitHub if it is not indexed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | string | yes | owner/name or URL |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_candidates Find candidate repositories ~91
Retrieve candidate GitHub repositories for the profile and return them with ranking instructions. Long results come in parts.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | language for the explanations, e.g. English, Chinese |
| part | integer | – | which part to return; start with 1 |
| pool | integer | – | how many candidates (default 30) |
| top | integer | – | how many picks (default 10) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_evidence Read the user's agent history ~114
Collect what the user's local coding agents know (installed tools, memory files and, at level L2, the user's own session messages), redacted and numbered, with instructions for writing a profile. Long results come in parts.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | integer | – | only sessions from the last N days |
| level | string | – | L0 installed tools; L1 adds memory and instruction files (default); L2 adds session messages and tool calls |
| part | integer | – | which part to return; start with 1 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
save_expansion Save search expansion ~29
Save the search terms and project names written for each profile entry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| expansion | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
save_profile Save the profile ~45
Save the profile JSON written from get_evidence. Refs that do not exist are dropped. Returns the profile and the instructions for the search expansion.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| synthesis | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
save_recommendations Save recommendations ~52
Save the ranking JSON written from find_candidates. Picks that name unknown candidates or profile entries are dropped. Returns the recommendations to show the user.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| answer | object | yes | – |
| top | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_repos Search repositories ~55
Keyword search over the indexed GitHub repositories, leaving out what the user already uses.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| include_used | boolean | – | also list repos the user already uses |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
show_profile Show the profile ~13
Show the saved profile.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
show_recommendations Show recommendations ~16
Show the last saved recommendations.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
unused_tools Unused installed tools ~20
List installed MCP servers and skills that no session ever called.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the repofit MCP server?
repofit runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx repofit. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · repofit
claude mcp add pth2002-repofit -- uvx repofit
What is the repofit MCP server?
repofit is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pth2002/repofit. Find GitHub projects that fit you, using what your coding agents already know about you. This page covers its PyPI package (repofit).
Is the repofit MCP server safe to use?
repofit scores 51 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the repofit MCP server expose?
repofit exposes 10 tools: get_evidence, save_profile, save_expansion, show_profile, find_candidates, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 493 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the repofit MCP server still maintained?
repofit is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the repofit MCP server under?
repofit declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.