Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Audiolla

OCI · DOCKER.IO/PSYB0T/AUDIOLLA:V1.1.7

Self-hosted MCP server: audio stems, mastering, MIR analysis, DSP, MIDI, speech tools.

0 this week 6 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 7% of OCI servers

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: this image's dependency list comes from an SBOM its publisher attached, which nothing verifies, so we will not report it as a clean result. View diagnostics → Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: this image's dependency list comes from an SBOM its publisher attached. It names packages and versions but not whether each is deprecated, still maintained or linked to its source, so there is nothing we can fairly grade.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency32
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 6 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (5)

  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure

Checks we could not complete (9)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  • Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: this image's dependency list comes from an SBOM its publisher attached, which nothing verifies, so we will not report it as a clean result.
  • Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  • Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: this image's dependency list comes from an SBOM its publisher attached. It names packages and versions but not whether each is deprecated, still maintained or linked to its source, so there is nothing we can fairly grade.
  • Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.
  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.
  • Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.
  • Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.
  • Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 19 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 18 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
  • 12 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
  • 1 Oct 26 6
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
  • 30 Sept 26 0
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/docker.io/psyb0t/audiolla:v1.1.7

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem oci
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 288 ungraded findings

From the publisher's SBOM, not graded. These advisories match packages listed in the SBOM the publisher attached to this image. A publisher naming a vulnerable package in their own image is credible, so we show them. Nothing verifies that SBOM, though, so the Known CVEs signal does not grade the image from it.

ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 CVE-2026-69112 high CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H no
PYSEC-2026-3804 CVE-2026-69112 high CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H no
GHSA-2g87-pp6c-29x5 high yes
GHSA-494j-54xm-rwp3 CVE-2026-111063 medium yes
GHSA-5wr8-gcqf-gqf3 CVE-2026-111064 high yes
GHSA-6cjc-53gc-5rqm CVE-2026-111065 medium yes
GHSA-9xw5-w5jj-pvcg CVE-2026-111066 high yes
GHSA-cq5v-8q36-5273 CVE-2026-69244 high yes
GHSA-f9xw-jh8m-3mwq CVE-2026-111748 medium yes
GHSA-gx76-c99x-2c96 CVE-2026-111749 low yes
GHSA-mfx4-hv73-q22v CVE-2026-69243 medium yes
GHSA-mq44-7p77-q5h7 CVE-2026-59881 medium yes
GHSA-pqxq-w44r-73xw CVE-2026-111750 medium yes
PYSEC-2026-3545 CVE-2026-69244 none yes
PYSEC-2026-3546 CVE-2026-69243 none yes
PYSEC-2026-3547 CVE-2026-59881 none yes
GHSA-5p39-cfhj-2xmp CVE-2026-64847 medium yes
GHSA-82r6-8w77-94w6 CVE-2026-63374 critical yes
PYSEC-2026-4024 CVE-2026-64847 none yes
PYSEC-2026-4025 CVE-2026-63374 none yes
GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2 critical yes
PYSEC-2026-4320 none yes
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5 CVE-2026-69247 high yes
GHSA-jwv3-5hgf-82ww CVE-2026-69249 high yes
GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c CVE-2026-69248 medium yes
PYSEC-2026-3552 CVE-2026-69247 none yes
PYSEC-2026-3553 CVE-2026-69249 none yes
PYSEC-2026-3554 CVE-2026-69248 none yes
GHSA-7wx4-6vff-v64p CVE-2026-45804 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
GHSA-98h9-4798-4q5v CVE-2026-44513 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-2446 CVE-2026-45804 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-40 CVE-2026-44513 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-41 CVE-2026-44827 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92 CVE-2026-112907 low CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-69hj-f68j-2879 CVE-2026-112909 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-8mx5-7m5m-r77g CVE-2026-112910 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L yes
GHSA-9vhv-jxww-xfm5 CVE-2026-112913 low CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-cwqr-hh33-gh44 CVE-2026-112915 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-fq56-3cx3-fjxp CVE-2026-112935 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-j8f7-rjxc-mr56 CVE-2026-112936 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L yes
GHSA-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4 CVE-2026-112939 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8 CVE-2026-112940 high CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H yes
GHSA-27vj-qcqg-25rc CVE-2026-104851 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-4217 CVE-2026-104851 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
GHSA-58pv-8j8x-9vj2 CVE-2026-23949 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-1469 CVE-2026-23949 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
GHSA-qqmf-gpg7-g8gw CVE-2026-58659 high CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-3624 CVE-2026-58659 none yes
GHSA-5639-2j2p-m4mx CVE-2026-102991 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N yes

Showing 50 of 288 vulnerabilities.

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. Our sandbox could not run this package, so no tool list has been captured. That is a gap on our side, not a finding about the package.

Install

Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.

oci · docker.io/psyb0t/audiolla:v1.1.7

# install command
$ docker pull docker.io/psyb0t/audiolla:v1.1.7
Common questions

What is the Audiolla MCP server?

Audiolla is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.psyb0t/audiolla. Self-hosted MCP server: audio stems, mastering, MIR analysis, DSP, MIDI, speech tools. This page covers its container image (docker.io/psyb0t/audiolla:v1.1.7).

Is the Audiolla MCP server safe to use?

Audiolla scores 6 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. The SBOM its publisher attached lists packages with 288 known advisories as of 5 November 2026. We do not grade that SBOM, as nothing verifies it. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the Audiolla MCP server still maintained?

Audiolla is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Audiolla MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 5 checks on Audiolla, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 1 more. 9 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Audiolla: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 5 more. 6 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a container image, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.