Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Agent evidence

PYPI · AGENT-EVIDENCE-MCP

Offline, read-only tools that verify AI claims against evidence and replay conformance vectors.

Available components

+4 this week 83 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 86% of PyPI servers

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 37 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to probityai/probity). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability55
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 402 tokens (~44/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +32
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.43 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 1 Nov 26 −30
    • Stability: 0.37 → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • The attested source repository moved: probityai/agent-evidence-mcp → probityai/probity security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Security disclosure: fail → pass ▲ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
    • Package version: 0.2.4 → 0.2.5 functional
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +11
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Provenance: fail → pass ▲ security
    • The attested source repository moved: probityai/agent-evidence-mcp security
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.4 functional
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.3 functional
  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +2
    • Stability: unverified → 0.17 ▲ functional
  • 21 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/agent-evidence-mcp@0.2.5

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo probityai/probity
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/probityai/probity/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/agent-evidence-mcp-v0.2.5
Rekor log index 3629912955
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:f071939b04933477c56b532a1db7deab93b914c7e4017609ce0389c5e2f63326

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 37 packages
Packages resolved 37
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~366 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
canonicalize_json ~45

Admit one JSON document and return its RFC 8785 canonical bytes, with the jcs-admit crate.

NameTypeReqDescription
documentstringyes–
profilestring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

check_artifact_digest ~51

Check that an artifact has a digest a TEA, CycloneDX or in-toto document names.

NameTypeReqDescription
artifact_base64–––
artifact_text–––
documentstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

explain_vector ~41

Return one vector: its manifest entry, the conditions it tests, and its input bytes.

NameTypeReqDescription
corpusstring––
vector_idstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

list_vector_corpora ~27

Name every shipped corpus with its suite revision and vector counts where it declares them.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

lookup_term ~32

Look a term up in the released vocabulary by exact key; otherwise suggest close keys.

NameTypeReqDescription
termstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

run_vectors ~46

Replay one corpus with the bundled reference verifier; per-vector rows come back in pages.

NameTypeReqDescription
corpusstring––
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

verify_claim ~43

Decide one claim against evidence bytes the caller supplies, with probity-verify.

NameTypeReqDescription
artifacts–––
caseobjectyes–
policyobjectyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

verify_dsse ~51

Verify a DSSE envelope against Ed25519 keys the caller trusts, with the dsse crate.

NameTypeReqDescription
envelopestringyes–
thresholdinteger––
trusted_keysarrayyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

verify_sample ~30

Run a bundled sample claim: contradicted, not_established or supported.

NameTypeReqDescription
scenariostringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Agent evidence MCP server?

Agent evidence runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx agent-evidence-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · agent-evidence-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add probityai-agent-evidence-mcp -- uvx agent-evidence-mcp
Common questions

What is the Agent evidence MCP server?

Agent evidence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.probityai/agent-evidence-mcp. Offline, read-only tools that verify AI claims against evidence and replay conformance vectors. This page covers its PyPI package (agent-evidence-mcp).

Is the Agent evidence MCP server safe to use?

Agent evidence scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Agent evidence MCP server expose?

Agent evidence exposes 9 tools: verify_claim, verify_sample, list_vector_corpora, run_vectors, explain_vector, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 366 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Agent evidence MCP server still maintained?

Agent evidence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Agent evidence MCP server under?

Agent evidence declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Agent evidence MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Agent evidence, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.