PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks
REMOTE · API.PNLLABS.COM
Trust checks for Solana trading: realized-PnL wallet trust, token safety, trade cost, forensics.
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 94% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 688 tokens (~172/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 1 Oct 26 0
- HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “check_wallet_forensics” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “check_wallet_trust” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 152 → 172 ▼ functional
- 29 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 137 → 152 ▼ functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 3 Aug 26 0
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Tool “check_token_safety” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “check_trade_cost” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “check_wallet_forensics” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “check_wallet_trust” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “check_token_safety” reworded the description of “mint” cosmetic
- “check_trade_cost” reworded the description of “size_sol” cosmetic
- “check_wallet_forensics” reworded the description of “address” cosmetic
- “check_wallet_trust” reworded the description of “address” cosmetic
- Tool “check_token_safety” changed its title: Check Token Structural Risk cosmetic
- Tool “check_trade_cost” changed its title: Estimate Trade Execution Cost cosmetic
- Tool “check_wallet_forensics” changed its title: Trace Wallet Funding Origin cosmetic
- Tool “check_wallet_trust” changed its title: Check Wallet Trust cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.pnllabs.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 27 Sept 2026 | 26 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6660dd3a03db4eb2a1439bd5fbf7b8a3c5b |
| SANs: api.pnllabs.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.pnllabs.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| pnllabs.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.pnllabs.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_token_safety Check Token Structural Risk ~133
Analyzes structural risk of a Solana token from on-chain data: real-holder concentration with bonding-curve and liquidity-pool accounts excluded, presence of known sniper-bot addresses among early buyers, and a simulated buy/sell round trip to detect honeypot behavior. Returns: verdict (LOW_RISK, ELEVATED, HIGH_RISK, CRITICAL, UNKNOWN), stable reason codes, and top-holder percentages. Scope is structural only; it does not detect risk that exists purely in trading behavior.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mint | string | yes | Solana token mint address (base58, 32-44 chars) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_trade_cost Estimate Trade Execution Cost ~119
Estimates what a trade of a given size would cost in a Solana token's main liquidity pool. Returns: expected slippage in percent, an estimated round-trip cost calibrated against measured live execution overhead, a recommended maximum size in SOL, pool liquidity, and a verdict (ACCEPTABLE_COST, ELEVATED_COST, HIGH_COST, UNTRADEABLE, NO_POOL, UNKNOWN).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mint | string | yes | Solana token mint address (base58) |
| size_sol | number | – | Trade size in SOL (default 0.5) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_wallet_forensics Trace Wallet Funding Origin ~94
Traces where a Solana wallet's funding came from and how old it is, using on-chain transfer history. Returns: origin classification (CEX_FUNDED, WALLET_FUNDED, UNKNOWN_ORIGIN, UNVERIFIABLE_ORIGIN, UNKNOWN), the funding transaction, wallet age, and a fresh_wallet flag.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | Solana wallet address (base58, 32-44 chars) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_wallet_trust Check Wallet Trust ~131
Recomputes the realized SOL profit and loss of a Solana wallet from its on-chain transaction history and returns a trust verdict. Returns: verdict (TRUSTED, NEUTRAL, UNTRUSTED, INSUFFICIENT, UNVERIFIABLE, UNKNOWN), a confidence level, realized profit/loss in SOL, the number of coins analyzed, stable reason codes, and flags such as known_sniper_bot. Returns UNVERIFIABLE when the history cannot be reconstructed reliably rather than estimating.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | Solana wallet address (base58, 32-44 chars) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks MCP server?
PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks is a hosted endpoint at https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.pnllabs.com
claude mcp add --transport http pnllabs-pnllabs 'https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp'
What is the PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks MCP server?
PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.PnLlabs/pnllabs. Trust checks for Solana trading: realized-PnL wallet trust, token safety, trade cost, forensics. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.pnllabs.com/mcp).
Is the PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks MCP server safe to use?
PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks MCP server expose?
PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks exposes 4 tools: check_wallet_trust, check_wallet_forensics, check_trade_cost, check_token_safety. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 477 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks MCP server still maintained?
PnL Labs — Solana Trust & Risk Checks is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.