InfoGrunt
REMOTE · INFOGRUNT.PL
Check a land plot in Poland: zoning plan, flood risk, utilities, local land prices. No account.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Maps and Location
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 648 tokens (~92/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +2
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “find_parcel” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “find_parcel_at_point” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_market_pulse” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_municipality_market” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_parcel_overview” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_parcel_section” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_location” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 67 → 92 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: fair → good functional
- Server version: 0.2.1 → 0.2.2 functional
- Tool “find_parcel” changed its title: Znajdź działkę po ID → Znajdź działkę po numerze cosmetic
- Tool “find_parcel_at_point” changed its title: Znajdź działkę w punkcie → Znajdź działkę w tym miejscu cosmetic
- Tool “get_market_pulse” changed its title: Sprawdź puls rynku → Ceny działek w regionie cosmetic
- Tool “get_municipality_market” changed its title: Sprawdź rynek gminy → Ceny działek w gminie cosmetic
- Tool “get_parcel_section” changed its title: Pobierz sekcję raportu → Szczegóły jednego tematu działki cosmetic
- Tool “search_location” changed its title: Wyszukaj lokalizację → Znajdź adres lub miejscowość cosmetic
- 24 Oct 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://infogrunt.pl/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.infogrunt.pl | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 26 Oct 2026 | 24 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 69a0d2dbaad47af5eba68419873d19eb7dd |
| SANs: *.infogrunt.pl, infogrunt.pl | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of infogrunt.pl. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| pl. | present | 2782 | 8 | Verified |
| infogrunt.pl. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://infogrunt.pl/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://infogrunt.pl/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://infogrunt.pl/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
find_parcel Znajdź działkę po numerze ~66
Znajdź działkę po pełnym numerze ewidencyjnym, np. 101710_2.0007.1504/6: gmina, obręb, położenie i link do strony działki.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| parcel_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
find_parcel_at_point Znajdź działkę w tym miejscu ~60
Która działka leży w tym miejscu? Dla punktu na mapie Polski podaje numer działki, gminę i link do strony działki.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lat | number | yes | – |
| lng | number | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_market_pulse Ceny działek w regionie ~60
Jak zmieniają się ceny działek budowlanych w całej Polsce albo w jednym województwie: ostatni tydzień, miesiąc i rok, z linkiem do mapy cen.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| region | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_municipality_market Ceny działek w gminie ~74
Ile kosztują działki w gminie? Mediana cen z prawdziwych transakcji, liczba sprzedaży, okres i pewność wyniku. Gminę wskazuje 6-cyfrowy kod z wyszukiwania adresu.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| teryt | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_parcel_overview Sprawdź działkę ~76
Sprawdź działkę: plan miejscowy, warunki zabudowy, powódź, media, dojazd, ochrona przyrody, osuwiska i ceny w okolicy. Pokazuje, co wiadomo o działce, i link do pełnego raportu.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| parcel_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_parcel_section Szczegóły jednego tematu działki ~76
Szczegóły jednego tematu dla działki, np. plan miejscowy, powódź, media, dojazd albo ceny transakcji w okolicy. Ze źródłem, datą i linkiem do strony działki.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| parcel_id | string | yes | – |
| section | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search_location Znajdź adres lub miejscowość ~64
Znajdź adres, ulicę albo miejscowość w Polsce, np. Polna 5, Wieliczka. Pokazuje miejsce na mapie działek, gminę i link do mapy na InfoGrunt.pl.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the InfoGrunt MCP server?
InfoGrunt is a hosted endpoint at https://infogrunt.pl/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · infogrunt.pl
claude mcp add --transport http pl-infogrunt-dzialki 'https://infogrunt.pl/mcp'
What is the InfoGrunt MCP server?
InfoGrunt is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as pl.infogrunt/dzialki. Check a land plot in Poland: zoning plan, flood risk, utilities, local land prices. No account. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://infogrunt.pl/mcp).
Is the InfoGrunt MCP server safe to use?
InfoGrunt scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the InfoGrunt MCP server expose?
InfoGrunt exposes 7 tools: search_location, find_parcel, find_parcel_at_point, get_parcel_overview, get_parcel_section, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 476 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the InfoGrunt MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to InfoGrunt without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the InfoGrunt MCP server still maintained?
InfoGrunt is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.