Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Wordnik

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-WORDNIK · 2 COMPONENTS

Wordnik MCP.

+3 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 65% of npm servers

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-wordnik). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 7 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 939 tokens (~78/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
  • Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 77

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-wordnik@0.2.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-wordnik
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-wordnik/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3561156442
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:b9affbc6e4c069124879c4139bfa464083c901b9dfdae59600bd13196040d53716f7c99323dbe2615f18dfb928fa128961ae59aa12dac19ceaac371ae

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~887 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
definitions ~97

Fetch dictionary definitions for a word from Wordnik; filter by part of speech, source dictionary, and limit. Returns definitions with source, text, and part of speech.

NameTypeReqDescription
includeRelatedboolean––
includeTagsboolean––
limitnumber––
partOfSpeechstring––
sourceDictionariesstring––
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

examples ~47

Usage examples.

NameTypeReqDescription
includeDuplicatesboolean––
limitnumber––
skipnumber––
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

frequency ~63

Return year-by-year corpus frequency counts for a word from Wordnik; optionally constrain to a startYear–endYear range.

NameTypeReqDescription
endYearnumber––
startYearnumber––
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hyphenation ~61

Return hyphenation breakpoints and syllable stress for a word from Wordnik's hyphenation endpoint.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber––
sourceDictionarystring––
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

phrases ~60

Return common bigram phrases containing a word from Wordnik's corpus; wlmi parameter sets minimum mutual-information threshold.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber––
useCanonicalboolean––
wlminumber––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pronunciations ~72

Return pronunciation strings (IPA, ahd, etc.) for a word from Wordnik; filter by source dictionary and format type.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber––
sourceDictionarystring––
typeFormatstring––
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

random_word ~98

Return a single random word from Wordnik; filter by part of speech, min/max length, and minimum corpus or dictionary occurrence count.

NameTypeReqDescription
excludePartOfSpeechstring––
hasDictionaryDefboolean––
includePartOfSpeechstring––
maxLengthnumber––
minCorpusCountnumber––
minDictionaryCountnumber––
minLengthnumber––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

random_words ~108

Return up to `limit` random words from Wordnik; filter by part of speech, min/max length, and minimum corpus or dictionary occurrence count.

NameTypeReqDescription
excludePartOfSpeechstring––
hasDictionaryDefboolean––
includePartOfSpeechstring––
limitnumber––
maxLengthnumber––
minCorpusCountnumber––
minDictionaryCountnumber––
minLengthnumber––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

related ~74

Return words related to a given word by relationship type (synonym, antonym, hypernym, hyponym, etc.) from Wordnik's relatedWords endpoint.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitPerRelationshipTypenumber––
relationshipTypesstring––
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~119

Search the Wordnik dictionary by query string with wildcard support; filter by part of speech, length, and corpus count. Returns matching word strings.

NameTypeReqDescription
caseSensitiveboolean––
excludePartOfSpeechstring––
includePartOfSpeechstring––
limitnumber––
maxLengthnumber––
minCorpusCountnumber––
minDictionaryCountnumber––
minLengthnumber––
querystringyes–
skipnumber––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

top_example ~40

Return the single highest-quality usage example sentence for a word from Wordnik's corpus.

NameTypeReqDescription
useCanonicalboolean––
wordstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

word_of_the_day ~48

Fetch the Wordnik Word of the Day for a given date (YYYY-MM-DD) or today if omitted; returns word, definitions, and example sentences.

NameTypeReqDescription
datestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Wordnik MCP server?

Wordnik runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-wordnik. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-wordnik

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-wordnik -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-wordnik
Common questions

What is the Wordnik MCP server?

Wordnik is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/wordnik. Wordnik MCP. This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-wordnik).

Is the Wordnik MCP server safe to use?

Wordnik scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Wordnik MCP server expose?

Wordnik exposes 12 tools: definitions, examples, top_example, related, phrases, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 887 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Wordnik MCP server still maintained?

Wordnik is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Wordnik MCP server under?

Wordnik declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.