Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Utah Code

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-UTAH-CODE · 2 COMPONENTS

Utah Code — state statutes by citation, plus topic search.

+3 this week 83 Trust /100

Last scanned (14 hours ago)

Scores higher than 77% of npm servers

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-utah-code). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 374 tokens (~187/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
  • Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +2
    • Stability: unverified → 0.13 ▲ functional
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 29 Oct 26 80

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-utah-code@0.2.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-utah-code
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-utah-code/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3560916708
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:4b167fc75795201204e0f28bc6b40ce6a42820d8c032453dca4e85e17b9d41b7234354b622a83ceb439db2565f52fd871b271fc1cdc3f0e0fc523e13a

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~320 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
ut_code_search ~135

Search the Utah Code BY TOPIC or keyword rather than citation — "concealed weapon permit", "landlord retaliatory eviction", "DUI penalties". Returns ranked sections with their citations; use ut_code_section afterward for the full text of one. Full-text search, so it answers questions no citation lookup can. Keyless.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber–Max results, default and maximum 10 — le.utah.gov's Solr proxy ignores the row count and always returns 10, so a larger value cannot be honoured.
querystringyesTopic or keywords, e.g. "concealed weapon permit".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

ut_code_section ~185

Get the FULL TEXT of a section of the Utah Code — Utah state law — by citation, plus its effective date and amendment history. "76-5-203" is murder (Title 76, Utah Criminal Code); "53-5a-102.2" is open/concealed carry. Keyless. Use for "what does Utah Code 76-5-203 say" or to check a Utah statute a case, lease, or citation relies on. Does NOT return superseded/historical full text — only the current version and its amendment citations.

NameTypeReqDescription
sectionstringyesSection as cited, e.g. "76-5-203" or "53-5a-102.2". The title and chapter are the first two dash-separated components; letter-suffixed titles ("75E") and chapters ("5a") are normal.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Utah Code MCP server?

Utah Code runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-utah-code. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-utah-code

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-utah-code -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-utah-code
Common questions

What is the Utah Code MCP server?

Utah Code is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/utah-code. Utah Code, state statutes by citation, plus topic search. This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-utah-code).

Is the Utah Code MCP server safe to use?

Utah Code scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Utah Code MCP server expose?

Utah Code exposes 2 tools: ut_code_section, ut_code_search. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 320 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Utah Code MCP server still maintained?

Utah Code is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Utah Code MCP server under?

Utah Code declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Utah Code MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Utah Code, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.