Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Turbulence Modeling Resource

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-TURBULENCE-MODELING-RESOURCE · 2 COMPONENTS

NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR) — verification and validation cases for…

+3 this week 83 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of npm servers

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 7 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 353 tokens (~176/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
  • Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 80

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource@0.2.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3560583957
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:60be477c8e275245a1d3d1e773781006904b55226db884dd8ab1622c4e049750e6a9a7511bb74f7ccda8751a93d181e158c38e6f66ad4bfabb443cafc

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~295 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
tmr_cases ~150

Catalog of NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR) verification and validation cases for turbulence models — flat plates, bumps-in-channel, airfoils (NACA 0012, NACA 4412), axisymmetric jets, a backward-facing step, the NASA wall-mounted hump, shock/boundary-layer interactions, a supersonic square duct, the ONERA M6 wing, and a high-Reynolds-number channel flow. Each entry gives the case id to pass to tmr_reference_data, its category (verification vs. validation), flow regime, and documented Mach/Reynolds conditions.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Filter to one category. Omit for all cases.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

tmr_reference_data ~145

Reference data (an experimental measurement or an established correlation, e.g. skin-friction coefficient Cf or lift/drag vs. angle of attack) for one NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource case, as published by the case's own data file. Only available for a subset of cases — call tmr_cases first and check "reference_data: true" — because most TMR case directories hold dozens of individual turbulence-model CFD result files alongside the reference data, and this tool only serves files the case page itself unambiguously labels as the reference/experimental data.

NameTypeReqDescription
casestringyesCase id from tmr_cases, e.g. "2DZP".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Turbulence Modeling Resource MCP server?

Turbulence Modeling Resource runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-turbulence-modeling-resource -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource
Common questions

What is the Turbulence Modeling Resource MCP server?

Turbulence Modeling Resource is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/turbulence-modeling-resource. NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR), verification and validation cases for… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-turbulence-modeling-resource).

Is the Turbulence Modeling Resource MCP server safe to use?

Turbulence Modeling Resource scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Turbulence Modeling Resource MCP server expose?

Turbulence Modeling Resource exposes 2 tools: tmr_cases, tmr_reference_data. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 295 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Turbulence Modeling Resource MCP server still maintained?

Turbulence Modeling Resource is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Turbulence Modeling Resource MCP server under?

Turbulence Modeling Resource declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.