Sec Xbrl
NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-SEC-XBRL · 2 COMPONENTS
SEC XBRL MCP — wraps SEC EDGAR XBRL API (data.sec.gov)
Available components
Last scanned (1 hour ago)
Scores higher than 81% of npm servers
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-sec-xbrl). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1103 tokens (~137/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
- Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (16)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.20 → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 81
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-sec-xbrl@0.2.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | pipeworx-io/mcp-sec-xbrl |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-sec-xbrl/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main |
| Rekor log index | 3692342765 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:8c6296ec7f3cd8da8bf9f8ab5a52f751cd4a69fb49d27c4a0d892bb66ee5115a5a1ce7561e78e68abc216eda416977538846f73ce13debddc94c6bf26 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_capital_markets_filings ~190
List recent SEC capital-markets filings for a company — shelf and IPO registrations (S-1, S-3, S-3ASR and the F- equivalents), 424 prospectuses, free-writing prospectuses, effectiveness notices and post-effective amendments. Answers "has this company filed a shelf", "what has it registered recently" and "is there an active ATM programme on file". A registration or prospectus filing is an event, so it does not prove securities were sold or quantify remaining shelf or ATM capacity, and an empty result covers only the years requested — a company may hold an effective shelf filed before that window.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | yes | Ticker, company name, or CIK. |
| limit | number | – | 1–100 (default 25). |
| years | number | – | Look-back, 1–10 years (default 3). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_company_concept ~148
Get a specific financial metric for a company across all filings. Use this to track revenue, net income, or any XBRL tag over time. Example: get_company_concept(cik: "320193", taxonomy: "us-gaap", tag: "Revenue").
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cik | string | yes | SEC Central Index Key (e.g., "320193" for Apple) |
| tag | string | yes | XBRL concept tag (e.g., "Revenue", "NetIncomeLoss", "Assets", "EarningsPerShareBasic") |
| taxonomy | string | yes | XBRL taxonomy: "us-gaap", "ifrs-full", "dei", or "srt" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_company_facts ~110
List all XBRL taxonomies and concept tags filed by a company (CIK required). Returns entity name, taxonomy names (us-gaap, dei, etc.), concept count per taxonomy, and a sample of up to 20 tag names each. Use get_company_concept or get_company_financials to retrieve actual numeric values for a specific tag.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cik | string | yes | SEC Central Index Key (e.g., "320193" for Apple, "789019" for Microsoft) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_company_financials ~272
High-level summary of a public US company's annual (10-K) financials: revenue, net income, total assets, cash, EPS, etc. Returns clean numerical values with the XBRL tag used and the period-end date. By default returns the most recent fiscal year; pass `fiscal_year_end` to get a specific year (e.g. "2024-12-31" for Tesla FY2024 or just "2024" to auto-match the year). Prefer this over get_company_facts/get_company_concept for any single-company financial snapshot question. Pass a CIK (e.g. "320193") or a ticker (e.g. "AAPL"; auto-resolves to CIK).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | yes | CIK (e.g., "320193", "0000320193") OR ticker symbol (e.g., "AAPL", "TSLA", "MSFT"). Ticker is auto-resolved to CIK via SEC EDGAR. |
| fiscal_year_end | string | – | Optional. Pass a 4-digit fiscal year ("2024") to get values from any 10-K period ending in that calendar year, OR a specific period-end date ("2024-12-31"). Omit to get the most recent fiscal year. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_dilution_profile ~74
Summarize SEC-tagged common shares outstanding, approximate year-over-year share change, and reported equity issuance proceeds. Share-count dates need not equal quarter end, tags vary by filer, and this is not a fully diluted capitalization table.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | yes | Ticker, company name, or CIK. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_liquidity_runway ~80
Estimate a company’s mechanical liquidity runway from its latest SEC-tagged cash/current investments and trailing-twelve-month operating cash flow. This is a screening calculation—not management guidance—and excludes future financing, commitments, restricted access, working-capital timing, and forecast changes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | yes | Ticker, company name, or CIK. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_rnd_burn_profile ~71
Calculate trailing-twelve-month SEC-tagged R&D expense and operating cash flow using annual plus current YTD minus prior-year comparable YTD. Returns the periods used and null when a defensible bridge cannot be built.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | yes | Ticker, company name, or CIK. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_filings ~102
Search recent SEC filings for a company by CIK. Optionally filter by filing type (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, etc.). Returns filing dates, types, and accession numbers.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cik | string | yes | SEC Central Index Key (e.g., "320193" for Apple) |
| type | string | – | Filing type filter (e.g., "10-K", "10-Q", "8-K", "DEF 14A") |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Sec Xbrl MCP server?
Sec Xbrl runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-sec-xbrl. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @pipeworx/mcp-sec-xbrl
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-sec-xbrl -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-sec-xbrl
What is the Sec Xbrl MCP server?
Sec Xbrl is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/sec-xbrl. SEC XBRL MCP, wraps SEC EDGAR XBRL API (data.sec.gov). This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-sec-xbrl).
Is the Sec Xbrl MCP server safe to use?
Sec Xbrl scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 6 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Sec Xbrl MCP server expose?
Sec Xbrl exposes 8 tools: get_company_facts, get_company_concept, search_filings, get_company_financials, get_liquidity_runway, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,047 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Sec Xbrl MCP server still maintained?
Sec Xbrl is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Sec Xbrl MCP server under?
Sec Xbrl declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Sec Xbrl MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Sec Xbrl, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.