Naag
NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-NAAG · 2 COMPONENTS
State attorney-general multistate enforcement, from the National Association of Attorneys General…
Available components
Last scanned (8 hours ago)
Scores higher than 74% of npm servers
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-naag). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 4 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1029 tokens (~257/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (16)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 7 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 3 Nov 26 −13
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.17 ▲ functional
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
- 2 Nov 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 29 Oct 26 79
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-naag@0.2.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | pipeworx-io/mcp-naag |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-naag/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main |
| Rekor log index | 3655607660 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:0716daec895b9d7612c27b130fd8fb744a58bf187daa4197ad47243b81a0aacdda958087b1091fb981b6ed30435bcabd0c11a806d1f64166bd1994cfe |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
naag_case_detail ~118
The full NAAG record for one multistate attorney-general case, given its numeric id or naag.org URL from naag_multistate_cases. Returns the complete complaint summary rather than a truncated one, plus every classification the record carries: participating states, lead plaintiff states, conduct type, civil or criminal, relief sought, resolution status, industry and any federal co-plaintiff.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| case | string | yes | Numeric case id (e.g. "48390") or the naag.org/multistate-case/... URL. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
naag_multistate_cases ~430
Search the National Association of Attorneys General database of MULTISTATE enforcement cases — lawsuits and investigations that coalitions of US state attorneys general brought together, largely antitrust and consumer protection: price-fixing, bid rigging, merger challenges, monopolization. Answers "which states sued this company together", "what multistate antitrust actions were filed this year", and "how were they resolved". Each case returns the case name, filing date, the participating and lead states, case and relief type, industry, resolution status, any federal co-plaintiff (DOJ, FTC) and a summary of the complaint.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| case_type | string | – | Conduct at issue, e.g. "price-fixing", "merger-review", "bid-rigging", "monopolization", "market-allocation-agreement". |
| federal_partner | string | – | Federal agency that joined as co-plaintiff: "usdoj" or "ftc". |
| filed_from | string | – | Earliest date the case record carries, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| filed_to | string | – | Latest date the case record carries, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| industry | string | – | Industry the defendants operate in, e.g. "pharmaceuticals", "insurance", "hospitals", "dairy". |
| lead_state | string | – | A state that led the case as named plaintiff — two-letter code or full name. |
| limit | number | – | Cases to return, 1-50 (default 20). |
| offset | number | – | Cases to skip, for paging (default 0). |
| query | string | – | Free text over case names and complaint summaries, e.g. a defendant ("Amazon", "Paramount") or a practice ("generic drug"). |
| resolution | string | – | How it ended, e.g. "settled", "pending", "consent-decree", "dismissed", "final-judgment". |
| state | string | – | A state that joined the coalition — two-letter code or full name ("NY", "New York"). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
naag_policy_letters ~208
Multistate coalition policy letters — the comment letters and formal positions that groups of state attorneys general send jointly to Congress, federal agencies and companies, on subjects like robocalls, AI, opioids and consumer data. Answers "have state AGs written to the FCC about this" and "which states signed that coalition letter". Returns the letter title, date, signing states and a summary, sourced from NAAG.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | Letters to return, 1-50 (default 20). |
| offset | number | – | Letters to skip (default 0). |
| query | string | – | Free text over letter titles and bodies, e.g. "robocall", "artificial intelligence", "Know Your Customer". |
| sent_from | string | – | Earliest letter date, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| sent_to | string | – | Latest letter date, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| state | string | – | A state that signed — two-letter code or full name. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
naag_press_releases ~221
Announcements and analysis published by the National Association of Attorneys General: press releases on coalition actions state AGs have just taken, and Attorney General Journal articles on consumer protection, antitrust, cybersecurity, public health and criminal law. Answers "what did state attorneys general announce recently" on a topic. Returns headline, date, topic category, summary and the naag.org link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | Items to return, 1-50 (default 20). |
| offset | number | – | Items to skip (default 0). |
| published_from | string | – | Earliest publication date, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| published_to | string | – | Latest publication date, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| query | string | – | Free text over headlines and summaries, e.g. "robocall", "opioid settlement", "data breach". |
| topic | string | – | Topic category, e.g. "consumer-protection", "antitrust", "cybersecurity-and-privacy", "public-health", "criminal-law", "opioids". |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Naag MCP server?
Naag runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-naag. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @pipeworx/mcp-naag
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-naag -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-naag
What is the Naag MCP server?
Naag is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/naag. State attorney-general multistate enforcement, from the National Association of Attorneys General… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-naag).
Is the Naag MCP server safe to use?
Naag scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 7 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Naag MCP server expose?
Naag exposes 4 tools: naag_multistate_cases, naag_case_detail, naag_policy_letters, naag_press_releases. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 977 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Naag MCP server still maintained?
Naag is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Naag MCP server under?
Naag declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Naag MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Naag, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.