Mississippi Code
NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-MISSISSIPPI-CODE · 2 COMPONENTS
Mississippi Code of 1972 (Annotated) — state statutes by citation, and a chapter list by title.…
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 76% of npm servers
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-mississippi-code). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 719 tokens (~239/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (16)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 3 Nov 26 −14
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 79
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-mississippi-code@0.2.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | pipeworx-io/mcp-mississippi-code |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-mississippi-code/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main |
| Rekor log index | 3655484892 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:b8e86e394278681fa5ad8594d0de05a5dd8dc31cba7f6c7a319a39fb52fd631a77d615717f98036c14f45627b78f98b87722bbcbc9b3e2e5d462983ba |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ms_code_chapters ~135
List the chapters within a title of the Mississippi Code of 1972, by title number ("97" is Crimes, "89" is Real and Personal Property, "27" is Taxation and Finance). Use this to browse a title when you do not have an exact section citation. Returns every chapter heading and number; call ms_code_section once you have a citation, or ms_code_search to find one by topic. Keyless.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | number | yes | Title number, e.g. 97 (Crimes) or 89 (Real and Personal Property). Mississippi titles are odd numbers 1-99. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ms_code_search ~169
Search the Mississippi Code of 1972 BY TOPIC or keyword rather than citation — "security deposit", "concealed carry", "DUI per se limit", "homicide". Matches against every section's official CATCHLINE across the whole Code (not full statutory body text — there is no full-text search anywhere in this source chain; the official LexisNexis tool, Justia, and FindLaw all sit behind the same Cloudflare bot-check, confirmed live). Returns matching citations, titles, and catchlines; call ms_code_section with a citation for the full text. Keyless.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | Max results to return, default 10, max 25. |
| query | string | yes | Topic or keywords, e.g. "security deposit return". |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ms_code_section ~360
Get the text of a section of the Mississippi Code of 1972 (Annotated) — Mississippi state law — by citation. "97-3-19" is homicide/murder; "89-8-19" is a landlord's duty to return a security deposit. Accepts natural forms: "97-3-19", "Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-19", "Section 97-3-19", "§ 97-3-19". Returns the catchline, the operative statutory text, the legislative "HISTORY:" line, and amendment/cross-reference notes when present — case-law annotations are deliberately excluded (can run to hundreds of entries per section). IMPORTANT: this source is a static public-domain copy current only through Release 78 (2020-07-08) — it will NOT reflect any amendment enacted 2021 or later; check `current_through` on every response. Also returns later_acts: a dated, linked overlay of every act this pack found in Mississippi's own signed-bill text touching this exact citation since the 2020-07-08 snapshot (chapter number, session, bill link) — NOT merged into the text, explicitly labelled so, with sessions_checked naming every session the overlay covers even when later_acts is empty. Use for "what does MS 97-3-19 say" or to check a Mississippi statute AND whether it has been amended since 2020-07-08. Keyless.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| citation | string | yes | Section citation, e.g. "97-3-19" (homicide) or "89-8-19" (security deposits). Title-chapter-section, dot/hyphen separated. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Mississippi Code MCP server?
Mississippi Code runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-mississippi-code. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @pipeworx/mcp-mississippi-code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-mississippi-code -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-mississippi-code
What is the Mississippi Code MCP server?
Mississippi Code is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/mississippi-code. Mississippi Code of 1972 (Annotated), state statutes by citation, and a chapter list by title.… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-mississippi-code).
Is the Mississippi Code MCP server safe to use?
Mississippi Code scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Mississippi Code MCP server expose?
Mississippi Code exposes 3 tools: ms_code_section, ms_code_chapters, ms_code_search. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 664 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Mississippi Code MCP server still maintained?
Mississippi Code is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Mississippi Code MCP server under?
Mississippi Code declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Mississippi Code MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Mississippi Code, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.