Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Jpl Ssd

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-JPL-SSD · 2 COMPONENTS

NASA/JPL Solar System Dynamics + CNEOS MCP. Keyless small-body (asteroid/comet), near-Earth…

+3 this week 85 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 87% of npm servers

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-jpl-ssd). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 2 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 524 tokens (~131/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
  • Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 82

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-jpl-ssd@0.2.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-jpl-ssd
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-jpl-ssd/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3649497219
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:b1300d78ea2733b427ce4cfb8259022f23660a1a53b6e7ac0943f1dc6b5450096e4dde030dbf6285e5a3d80c3ba932669ee6a75aeeaa4c9d4b3021fe5

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~468 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
close_approaches ~131

NASA/JPL CNEOS — list near-Earth close approaches to Earth in a date range, with miss distance (AU), relative velocity (km/s), and absolute magnitude (size proxy). Keyless.

NameTypeReqDescription
endstringyesEnd date (inclusive), YYYY-MM-DD.
limitnumber–Max rows, default 25, max 100.
max_distancestring–Max miss distance, default "0.05" AU. Accepts lunar distances too, e.g. "10LD".
startstringyesStart date (inclusive), YYYY-MM-DD.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_small_body ~95

NASA/JPL Solar System Dynamics — look up an asteroid or comet by name or designation and return its orbit and physical parameters (eccentricity, semi-major axis, MOID, diameter, albedo, NEO/PHA flags). Keyless.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesAsteroid/comet name or designation, e.g. "Ceres", "433 Eros", "Halley", "2021 PH27".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

impact_risk ~148

NASA/JPL CNEOS Sentry — Earth impact risk for asteroids. Pass a designation for one object's cumulative impact probability, Palermo/Torino scale, diameter, and impact window; or omit it to list all currently-tracked objects above an impact-probability threshold. Keyless.

NameTypeReqDescription
designationstring–Optional specific object, e.g. "99942" or "2022 KK2". If given, returns that object's risk summary.
limitnumber–List mode only — max objects, default 25.
min_probabilitynumber–List mode only — minimum cumulative impact probability, default 1e-4. Ignored if designation is given.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

recent_fireballs ~94

NASA/JPL CNEOS — most recent atmospheric fireballs/bolides detected by U.S. Government sensors, with date, radiated and total impact energy (kilotons of TNT), location, altitude, and velocity. Keyless.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber–Max events, default 15, max 100.
min_energynumber–Optional minimum total impact energy in kilotons of TNT.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Jpl Ssd MCP server?

Jpl Ssd runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-jpl-ssd. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-jpl-ssd

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-jpl-ssd -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-jpl-ssd
Common questions

What is the Jpl Ssd MCP server?

Jpl Ssd is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/jpl-ssd. NASA/JPL Solar System Dynamics + CNEOS MCP. Keyless small-body (asteroid/comet), near-Earth… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-jpl-ssd).

Is the Jpl Ssd MCP server safe to use?

Jpl Ssd scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Jpl Ssd MCP server expose?

Jpl Ssd exposes 4 tools: get_small_body, close_approaches, impact_risk, recent_fireballs. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 468 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Jpl Ssd MCP server still maintained?

Jpl Ssd is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Jpl Ssd MCP server under?

Jpl Ssd declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Jpl Ssd MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Jpl Ssd, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.