Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Hal Fr

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-HAL-FR · 2 COMPONENTS

HAL (Hyper Articles en Ligne) MCP — French national open research archive.

+3 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 72% of npm servers

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-hal-fr). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 255 tokens (~63/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
  • Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage91
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 73% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +27
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Dependency health: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 2 Nov 26 −26
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
    • Dependency health: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +1
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 29 Oct 26 79

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-hal-fr@0.2.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-hal-fr
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-hal-fr/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3637388026
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:723915da812a7e4c4499769eebf065a2b669f1b107464d1761323332935b2a0391cfba352b2b3b7c589baef12760133f6a5ccfdae16d12c365f3112cc

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~203 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
author ~37

Author lookup (free-text query).

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes–
rowsnumber–1-1000 (default 25).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get ~21

Single document by HAL id.

NameTypeReqDescription
hal_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~105

Solr-style search across HAL.

NameTypeReqDescription
flstring–Comma-sep fields to return.
fqstring–Solr filter query.
querystringyesFree-text or Solr query (e.g. "title_t:transformer").
rowsnumber–1-10000 (default 25).
sortstring–e.g. "submittedDate_tdate desc"
startnumber–0-based offset.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

structure ~40

Research-structure (lab/department) lookup.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes–
rowsnumber–1-1000 (default 25).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Hal Fr MCP server?

Hal Fr runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-hal-fr. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-hal-fr

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-hal-fr -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-hal-fr
Common questions

What is the Hal Fr MCP server?

Hal Fr is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/hal-fr. HAL (Hyper Articles en Ligne) MCP, French national open research archive. This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-hal-fr).

Is the Hal Fr MCP server safe to use?

Hal Fr scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 6 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Hal Fr MCP server expose?

Hal Fr exposes 4 tools: search, get, author, structure. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 203 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Hal Fr MCP server still maintained?

Hal Fr is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Hal Fr MCP server under?

Hal Fr declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Hal Fr MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Hal Fr, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.