Fcc Ecfs
NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-FCC-ECFS · 2 COMPONENTS
FCC Electronic Comment Filing System public search and retrieval.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 76% of npm servers
Category Search and Retrieval
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-fcc-ecfs). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 533 tokens (~133/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage91
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 69% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +2
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.10 ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
- 30 Oct 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 29 Oct 26 79
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-fcc-ecfs@0.2.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | pipeworx-io/mcp-fcc-ecfs |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-fcc-ecfs/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main |
| Rekor log index | 3635937659 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:2bd26b5a9347396c1cef120eec6a2ee5b530d69509aff09eee8c4c8aebd74c221c1fff9abad9dc833c03851b0f35bb5d6a809796b9b70dce8ba32ffd7 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ecfs_docket_filings ~105
List FCC ECFS filings in an exact proceeding/docket, newest first, including documents and parties. A filing reflects the submitter’s position and is not an FCC decision.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _apiKey | string | – | Optional api.data.gov key for higher limits; defaults to DEMO_KEY. |
| limit | number | – | – |
| offset | number | – | – |
| proceeding | string | yes | Exact docket/proceeding number, e.g. 11-42. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filings | array | yes | – |
| returned | number | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
ecfs_filing_detail ~73
Retrieve one FCC ECFS filing by submission ID with all public proceedings, filers, authors, law firms, status, and official document/attachment URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _apiKey | string | – | Optional api.data.gov key for higher limits; defaults to DEMO_KEY. |
| submission_id | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| documents | array | yes | – |
| proceedings | array | yes | – |
| source_url | string | yes | – |
| submission_id | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
ecfs_search_filings ~201
Search FCC ECFS filings using the public API. Use filer to list filings submitted BY a specific company (exact name match); use query for full-text search across all filings. Returns filer/author, proceeding, submission type, dates, and official document links. Search matches are filings in the public record, not FCC findings or endorsements.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _apiKey | string | – | Optional api.data.gov key for higher limits; defaults to DEMO_KEY. |
| filer | string | – | Filter to filings submitted BY this exact company or person name (e.g. "T-Mobile USA, Inc."). Use instead of query when searching for a specific filer's submissions. |
| limit | number | – | Results (1-100, default 25). |
| offset | number | – | Pagination offset (default 0). |
| query | string | – | Full-text search across all ECFS filings — matches ANY mention of the term, not just filings BY that party. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filings | array | yes | – |
| returned | number | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
ecfs_search_proceedings ~96
Search FCC ECFS proceedings/dockets by exact number or public API query and return descriptions, bureau, dates, and docket links.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _apiKey | string | – | Optional api.data.gov key for higher limits; defaults to DEMO_KEY. |
| limit | number | – | – |
| offset | number | – | – |
| proceeding | string | – | Exact proceeding number. |
| query | string | – | Optional proceeding search text. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| proceedings | array | yes | – |
| returned | number | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Fcc Ecfs MCP server?
Fcc Ecfs runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-fcc-ecfs. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @pipeworx/mcp-fcc-ecfs
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-fcc-ecfs -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-fcc-ecfs
What is the Fcc Ecfs MCP server?
Fcc Ecfs is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/fcc-ecfs. FCC Electronic Comment Filing System public search and retrieval. This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-fcc-ecfs).
Is the Fcc Ecfs MCP server safe to use?
Fcc Ecfs scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Fcc Ecfs MCP server expose?
Fcc Ecfs exposes 4 tools: ecfs_search_filings, ecfs_docket_filings, ecfs_filing_detail, ecfs_search_proceedings. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 475 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Fcc Ecfs MCP server still maintained?
Fcc Ecfs is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Fcc Ecfs MCP server under?
Fcc Ecfs declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.