Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Crawlgraph

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-CRAWLGRAPH · 2 COMPONENTS

CrawlGraph MCP — backlink intelligence on the public Common Crawl webgraph (4.4B edges, 120M…

83 Trust /100

Last scanned (21 hours ago)

Scores higher than 77% of npm servers

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-crawlgraph). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 864 tokens (~144/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
  • Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +27
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Dependency health: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 31 Oct 26 −26
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Dependency health: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 80

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-crawlgraph@0.2.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-crawlgraph
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-crawlgraph/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3612286337
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:34fba63206fa124479073b14febad2e9a6016ab4ebeeeaff94c27550d284dec3f88aae0d9bac7615b825fcc621e20bd3b2ccbd44b614d9cbd3187bedd

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~811 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
crawlgraph_backlinks ~203

Referring domains for a target domain from the Common Crawl webgraph (4.4B edges, 120M domains). Returns linking domains ranked by CrawlGraph authority — useful for SEO audits, competitor backlink profiles, link-building gap research, and verifying who is citing a brand. One call = one quota credit.

NameTypeReqDescription
_apiKeystringyesCrawlGraph API key (cg_live_… Bearer token).
domainstringyesTarget domain to look up (e.g., "example.com"). Bare host, no scheme.
limitnumber–Max linking domains to return (default 1000, max 10000).
release_idstring–Optional Common Crawl release (e.g., "CC-MAIN-2026-04"). Default = latest. Use crawlgraph_releases to list.
sortstring–Sort by "authority" (default) or "hosts" (number of distinct linking hosts).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

crawlgraph_domain_changes ~137

Quarter-over-quarter diff of referring domains for a domain — what was added or lost between two Common Crawl releases. Useful for catching link rot, sudden spikes (PR coverage), and outreach campaign attribution. Counts as one call against the backlinks quota.

NameTypeReqDescription
_apiKeystringyesCrawlGraph API key.
domainstringyesTarget domain.
fromstring–Older release_id (e.g., "CC-MAIN-2025-51"). Default = previous release.
tostring–Newer release_id (e.g., "CC-MAIN-2026-04"). Default = latest release.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

crawlgraph_gap_analysis ~145

Backlink gap analysis: find domains linking to your competitors but NOT to you. Submit your domain + 1–5 competitor domains and CrawlGraph runs an async job (typically completes in seconds; longer for large profiles). This tool polls up to ~10s and either returns the full gap list, or — if still running — returns the job_id so you can resume via crawlgraph_gap_status. Counts against the gap-analysis quota when the job is submitted.

NameTypeReqDescription
_apiKeystringyesCrawlGraph API key.
competitor_domainsarrayyes1–5 competitor domains to compare against.
my_domainstringyesYour domain (bare host).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

crawlgraph_gap_outreach_targets ~176

The warm-outreach play: gap_analysis filtered to ONLY the linking domains that link to EVERY competitor you listed but not to you. These are the highest-conviction outreach candidates — every competitor in the set has the link, so the topic/audience is verified. Same async pattern as crawlgraph_gap_analysis (polls up to ~10s; returns job_id if still running). Counts as one gap-analysis quota call.

NameTypeReqDescription
_apiKeystringyesCrawlGraph API key.
competitor_domainsarrayyes2–5 competitor domains. The filter is strongest with more competitors; 2 is the minimum for "warm outreach" to be meaningful.
min_authoritynumber–Optional minimum CrawlGraph authority threshold to filter results client-side.
my_domainstringyesYour domain.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

crawlgraph_gap_status ~103

Poll a previously-submitted gap analysis job by ID. Use this when crawlgraph_gap_analysis or crawlgraph_gap_outreach_targets returned status=pending with a job_id — call this with the same job_id to retrieve the result once status=completed. Read-only; no quota cost.

NameTypeReqDescription
_apiKeystringyesCrawlGraph API key.
job_idstringyesThe gap job ID (looks like "gap_a1b2c3").

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

crawlgraph_releases ~47

List the Common Crawl releases CrawlGraph has indexed (used as release_id in backlinks). Free; not counted against quota.

NameTypeReqDescription
_apiKeystringyesCrawlGraph API key.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Crawlgraph MCP server?

Crawlgraph runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-crawlgraph. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-crawlgraph

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-crawlgraph -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-crawlgraph
Common questions

What is the Crawlgraph MCP server?

Crawlgraph is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/crawlgraph. CrawlGraph MCP, backlink intelligence on the public Common Crawl webgraph (4.4B edges, 120M… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-crawlgraph).

Is the Crawlgraph MCP server safe to use?

Crawlgraph scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Crawlgraph MCP server expose?

Crawlgraph exposes 6 tools: crawlgraph_backlinks, crawlgraph_gap_analysis, crawlgraph_gap_outreach_targets, crawlgraph_gap_status, crawlgraph_releases, crawlgraph_domain_changes. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 811 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Crawlgraph MCP server still maintained?

Crawlgraph is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Crawlgraph MCP server under?

Crawlgraph declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.