Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

China Macro

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-CHINA-MACRO · 2 COMPONENTS

China macro: PBOC Loan Prime Rate, headline NBS indicators (via Eastmoney's data centre), 70-city…

+4 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 72% of npm servers

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-china-macro). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 4 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1671 tokens (~334/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
  • Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +27
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Dependency health: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 31 Oct 26 −26
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Dependency health: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 78

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-china-macro@0.2.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-china-macro
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-china-macro/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3606768782
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:d123ffb8b4af8d38e778a05f2b25597701343b689fcb81c191eef0ed31efccdfd5cecb5af8b0eb3cd74fca85c56d3def6e80750d8c18dc44ebe6f9ee5

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~1,616 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
china_house_prices ~273

China's NBS 70-city residential price indexes — new-build commercial housing (新建商品住宅) and resale/existing housing (二手住宅), year-on-year and month-on-month, for Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and 67 other NBS-tracked cities. Pass `city` (English name, e.g. "Beijing") for that city's history (up to 24 months); pass `month` ("YYYY-MM") to pin a specific release; pass neither for the latest month's full 70-city cross-section. Index values use the prior period = 100 convention (e.g. 97.7 = a 2.3% year-on-year fall). Answers "Beijing home price index", "which Chinese cities have falling house prices", "China 70-city house price index for August". Keyless, sourced live from the National Bureau of Statistics of China, via Eastmoney's data centre.

NameTypeReqDescription
citystring–One of the 70 NBS-tracked cities, by English name (e.g. "Shanghai", "Chengdu"). Omit for all 70 cities in the latest month.
monthstring–A specific release month as "YYYY-MM" (e.g. "2026-08"). Omit for the latest available month.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

china_lpr ~235

China's PBOC Loan Prime Rate (贷款市场报价利率, LPR) history — the 1-year and 5-year benchmark lending rates, each with its official reference/announcement date. Published monthly on the 20th (or next business day) by the National Interbank Funding Center under PBOC authorization. The 1-year rate anchors most corporate and consumer loans; the 5-year rate anchors mortgages. Returns up to the last 12 monthly announcements (the publisher exposes only a rolling ~1-year window) plus a `latest` field for the most recent print. Answers "what is the current PBOC LPR", "China's 1-year and 5-year loan prime rate history", "when did the PBOC last cut the LPR". Keyless, sourced live from the National Interbank Funding Center, under PBOC authorization.

NameTypeReqDescription
monthsnumber–How many of the most recent monthly rows to return, 1-12 (default 12). The upstream only exposes a rolling ~1-year window, so values above 12 are capped at 12.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

china_lpr_latest ~108

China's most recent PBOC Loan Prime Rate (贷款市场报价利率一年期/五年期, LPR 1Y/5Y) print only — a cheap single-row call for just the current 1-year and 5-year rates and their official reference/announcement date, without the 12-month history. Use china_lpr instead if you need the trend over time. Keyless, sourced live from the National Interbank Funding Center, under PBOC authorization.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

china_macro_indicator ~754

China's headline National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) macro indicators — one tool, pick an `indicator`: `cpi` (Consumer Price Index, national/urban/rural, y/y + m/m), `ppi` (Producer Price Index), `pmi` (manufacturing + non-manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index), `gdp` (quarterly GDP, published as year-to-date cumulative, by sector), `industrial_production` (industrial value-added growth), `retail_sales` (total retail sales of consumer goods), `fixed_asset_investment` (FAI), `money_supply` (M0/M1/M2 outstanding + growth), or `trade` (General Administration of Customs monthly export/import totals in USD). Returns the latest period's values first (with its period, e.g. "2026-09"), then up to `periods` months/quarters of history, newest first — every Chinese NBS field name translated to an English name with its unit and the index convention it uses (prior-period = 100 unless stated otherwise). Answers "China's latest CPI", "China PMI history", "China Q2 GDP growth", "China M2 money supply", "China's trade surplus last month". Default route is a republisher's data centre. Pass `source: "nbs"` to read the National Bureau of Statistics of China's own database directly: every series then carries its period, period TYPE (single month/quarter vs year-to-date), measure (index vs percent change vs level), unit and base, exactly as published and never converted, and `data_as_of`. The direct route also adds `urban_unemployment` (surveyed urban unemployment rate) and `capacity_utilization` (industrial capacity utilisation, quarterly), and `region` (a province name, or `all` for the 31 mainland provincial-level regions in one period) for cpi, ppi, industrial_production, fixed_asset_investment and gdp. A series whose base cannot be established from the publisher's own label comes back basis_status "unresolved" rather than guessed. Keyless, sourced live from the National Bureau of Statistics of China (General Administration of Customs for `trade`).

NameTypeReqDescription
indicatorstringyesWhich NBS/Customs indicator to return.
periodstring–(source nbs, region "all") The period to cross-section: "YYYY-MM" for monthly series, "YYYY-Qn" for quarterly ones. Omit for the latest period with data.
periodsnumber–How many of the most recent monthly/quarterly rows to return, 1-36 (default 12).
regionstring–(source nbs) A mainland province by English or Chinese name (e.g. "Guangdong", "广东省") for that region's history, or "all" for all 31 mainland provincial-level regions in one period. Available for cpi…
seriesstring–(source nbs) Return one named series only, e.g. "cpi_yoy_index", "cpi_mom_index", "ppi_yoy_index", "manufacturing_pmi". Omit for every series of the indicator; an unknown name lists the valid ones.
sourcestring–Which route serves the data. Default "eastmoney" (republisher). "nbs" reads the National Bureau of Statistics of China directly and returns typed series (period type, measure, unit, base). Implied by…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

china_rates ~246

China's money-market and government-bond benchmark rates. `series: "shibor"` returns the Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate across all 8 tenors (overnight through 1-year) — the latest 11:00-Beijing-time fixing plus up to `days` of daily history. `series: "yield_curve"` returns the China Government Bond yield curve: the dated 1-year/10-year benchmark series (IMF SDDS disclosure) plus CFETS's real-time quoted-yield curve across every actively-traded CGB maturity (~1 month to ~50 years). Answers "current SHIBOR rates", "China's 10-year government bond yield", "China yield curve history". Keyless, sourced live from the China Foreign Exchange Trade System / National Interbank Funding Center.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysnumber–(shibor only) How many calendar days of history to request, 1-365 (default 30).
periodsnumber–(yield_curve only) How many daily rows of the 1Y/10Y benchmark history to return, 1-60 (default 20).
seriesstringyesWhich rate series to return.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the China Macro MCP server?

China Macro runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-china-macro. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-china-macro

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-china-macro -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-china-macro
Common questions

What is the China Macro MCP server?

China Macro is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/china-macro. China macro: PBOC Loan Prime Rate, headline NBS indicators (via Eastmoney's data centre), 70-city… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-china-macro).

Is the China Macro MCP server safe to use?

China Macro scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the China Macro MCP server expose?

China Macro exposes 5 tools: china_lpr, china_lpr_latest, china_macro_indicator, china_house_prices, china_rates. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,616 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the China Macro MCP server still maintained?

China Macro is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the China Macro MCP server under?

China Macro declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the China Macro MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on China Macro, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.