Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework

PYPI · UNIVERSAL-TEST-FRAMEWORK

Polyglot MCP test generation with 8-section contract enforcement across Python, TS, Java, Go, C++.

+10 this week 72 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 68% of PyPI servers

Category Testing and QA

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security82
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects jinja2 3.1.4, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 28 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1918 tokens (~137/item across 14 items; 14 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
  • Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "run_tests" implies "execute" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 −5
    • Stability: pass → 0.63 functional
  • 3 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 29 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 22 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/universal-test-framework@1.0.2

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Vulnerabilities 6 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-cpwx-vrp4-4pq7 CVE-2025-27516 medium yes
GHSA-gmj6-6f8f-6699 CVE-2024-56201 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
GHSA-q2x7-8rv6-6q7h CVE-2024-56326 high CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-1471 CVE-2025-27516 none yes
PYSEC-2026-1472 CVE-2024-56201 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-1475 CVE-2024-56326 high CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 28 packages
Packages resolved 28
Stale 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 14 exposed · ~1,918 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
analyze_coverage ~71

Analyze the coverage of a test suite and identify gaps.

NameTypeReqDescription
language––Language for tool recommendations
source_code––Source code to identify uncovered symbols
test_typestring–Test type for threshold lookup
testsarrayyesList of test dicts (output from generate_tests)

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

build_traceability_matrix ~53

Build a requirements-to-tests traceability matrix.

NameTypeReqDescription
requirements––Explicit list of requirement IDs to check coverage against
testsarrayyesList of test dicts (must include test_id and requirement_mapping)

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

detect_language_framework ~44

Detect programming language and test framework from source code.

NameTypeReqDescription
file_path––Optional file path for extension-based detection
source_codestringyesSource code to analyze

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

feedback_status ~160

Get UTF feedback loop status: gap analysis, coverage health, trend, and delta requirements.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_gapsboolean–Run gap analysis and coverage health check (default: True)
compute_trendboolean–Compute coverage trend over time (default: True)
project_dir––Absolute path to the caller's project root. Points the registry at <project_dir>/.utf/utf.db. Defaults to the current working directory of the MCP client process.
project_id––Project to report on (defaults to current directory name)
requirements––Requirements text to compare against registry for delta detection
trend_daysinteger–Number of days of history to include in trend (default: 30)

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

generate_report ~121

Generate the 8-section contract compliance report (Tool #12). Reads test records and execution results from the registry, builds the contract report in the requested formats, and returns report paths + summary.

NameTypeReqDescription
cwd––Project root directory (defaults to server cwd).
formats––Output formats: subset of ["html", "junit", "json"]. Defaults to all three.
open_htmlboolean–Open the HTML report in the default browser (dev mode).
project_id––Registry project ID (defaults to current directory name).

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

generate_tests ~291

Generate a complete test suite satisfying the 8-section test contract. The framework automatically: - Detects language and framework from source code - Generates tests for happy path, failure paths, and boundary cases - Validates every test against the 8-section contract before returning - Builds a traceability matrix linking tests to requirements - Identifies coverage gaps and makes recommendations

NameTypeReqDescription
file_path––File path hint for language detection (e.g., 'src/auth.py')
framework––Override framework detection. One of: pytest | jest | junit5 | go-test | playwright | k6
language––Override language detection. One of: python | typescript | javascript | java | go | cpp
project_dir––Absolute path to the caller's project root. The SQLite registry and reports will be stored under <project_dir>/.utf/. Defaults to the current working directory of the MCP client pro…
requirements_text––User stories, acceptance criteria, Jira tickets, or requirements. Include IDs like US-001, AC-2.1, REQ-042 for traceability.
source_code––Source code to analyze (function/class/module). Optional but recommended.
test_typestringyesType of tests to generate. One of: unit | integration | api | e2e | contract | performance | security

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

health ~50

Health check for the Universal Test Framework MCP server. Returns server status, version, and uptime. Suitable for use as a Docker HEALTHCHECK command, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probe, or basic availability verification.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

import_test_results ~192

Import JUnit XML execution results into the UTF registry. Use this when you have already run tests with pytest / Maven / Go and want to register the results so that generate_report shows real pass/fail rates.

NameTypeReqDescription
frameworkstring–Framework label (pytest|jest|...). Default: pytest
junit_xml_pathstringyesPath to the JUnit XML file (absolute or relative to project_dir).
languagestring–Language label (python|typescript|...). Default: python
project_dir––Absolute path to caller's project root. Registry stored at <project_dir>/.utf/utf.db. Defaults to UTF_PROJECT_DIR or cwd.
project_id––Override project name in registry (defaults to project_dir name).
test_typestring–Test type label (unit|integration|api|e2e|...). Default: e2e

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

query_registry ~138

Query the UTF persistent test registry.

NameTypeReqDescription
language––Filter by language (python | typescript | …)
project_dir––Absolute path to the caller's project root. Points the registry query at <project_dir>/.utf/utf.db. Defaults to the current working directory of the MCP client process.
project_id––Filter by project (defaults to current directory name)
requirement_id––Filter tests that cover a specific requirement ID
status––Filter by status (generated | executed | failed | gap)
test_type––Filter by test type (unit | integration | api | …)

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

register_contracts ~313

Parse test files and register per-method 8-section contract records. This is the UTF registration bridge — it reads LLM-written test files, extracts the per-method 8-section comment blocks, and upserts status=generated rows into the UTF registry. Without this step, generate_report has no Per-Test Contract Detail cards. IMPORTANT — Phase 1, Step ③ of the UTF 3-phase workflow: ① generate_tests (scaffold) ② Write real test methods with per-method TC-{PRJ}-{MODULE}-{NNN} blocks ③ register_contracts ← this tool ④ generate_report (verify contract detail cards) ⑤ pytest --junit-xml=... ⑥ import_test_results ⑦ generate_report (now shows both contract cards AND execution results)

NameTypeReqDescription
frameworkstring–One of pytest|jest|junit5|... Default: pytest
languagestring–One of python|typescript|java|go|... Default: python
project_dir––Absolute path to project root (.utf/utf.db lives here). Defaults to UTF_PROJECT_DIR env var or cwd.
project_id––Registry project label. Defaults to project_dir basename.
test_filesarrayyesList of test file paths (absolute or relative to project_dir).
test_typestring–One of unit|integration|api|e2e|... Default: e2e

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

run_mutation_tests ~196

Run mutation testing on a source+test file pair and return coverage metrics. Supports mutmut (Python), Stryker (JS/TS), PIT (Java), and gremlins (Go). The adapter is auto-detected based on language and tool availability.

NameTypeReqDescription
block_belownumber–Score below which the result is flagged as blocked (default: 0.50)
languagestringyesLanguage of the files (python | javascript | typescript | java | go)
minimum_scorenumber–Threshold to pass (default: 0.70 = 70% killed)
project_dir––Project root directory (defaults to cwd)
source_filestringyesPath to the source file to mutate
test_filestringyesPath to the test file to run against mutants
timeout_secondsinteger–Mutation run timeout in seconds (default: 300)

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

run_tests ~128

Execute test files and return structured results with CI annotations. Execution is always optional — controlled by UTF config. Never blocks generation.

NameTypeReqDescription
framework––Test framework hint (pytest | vitest | jest | junit5 | maven | gradle | go)
languagestringyesLanguage of the tests (python | typescript | javascript | java | go)
project_dir––Project root directory (defaults to cwd)
test_filesarrayyesList of test file paths to execute
timeout_secondsinteger–Per-file execution timeout in seconds (default: 120)

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

suggest_test_types ~41

Analyze code/requirements and suggest which test types to apply.

NameTypeReqDescription
requirements_text––Requirements or user stories
source_code––Source code to analyze

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

validate_test_contract ~120

Validate a test or test suite against the 8-section contract. Use this to check any existing test — generated or hand-written — for compliance. The contract requires all 8 sections: Test ID, Why Generated, Requirement Mapping, How it Exercises, Coverage Contribution, Expected Outcome, Gaps, Meaningfulness Check.

NameTypeReqDescription
test_content––Raw markdown test text (paste any test here for quick validation)
test_dict––Structured test as dict with 8-section keys
tests_list––List of raw markdown strings for suite-level validation

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework MCP server?

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx universal-test-framework. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · universal-test-framework

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add phoenice-labs-universal-test-framework -- uvx universal-test-framework
Common questions

What is the io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework MCP server?

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework. Polyglot MCP test generation with 8-section contract enforcement across Python, TS, Java, Go, C++. This page covers its PyPI package (universal-test-framework).

Is the io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework MCP server safe to use?

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 6 known advisories against it as of 4 November 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework MCP server expose?

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework exposes 14 tools: generate_tests, validate_test_contract, analyze_coverage, build_traceability_matrix, suggest_test_types, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,918 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework MCP server still maintained?

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework MCP server under?

io.github.phoenice-labs/universal-test-framework declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.