Genius Decision
REMOTE · GENIUSDECISION.APP
Create and evaluate versioned decision models with reproducible results and declared assumptions.
Available components
Last scanned (10 hours ago)
Scores higher than 81% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category AI and Machine Learning
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 409 tokens (~45/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
- Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 2 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 5 Nov 26 0
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
- Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: 0.70 → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
- HSTS header: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://geniusdecision.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=geniusdecision.app | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 5 Oct 2026 | 3 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5898fb67921b5828d4b08b7768ed2b0240e |
| SANs: geniusdecision.app | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of geniusdecision.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | DS published | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| geniusdecision.app. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self'; img-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; form-action 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://geniusdecision.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://geniusdecision.app/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://geniusdecision.app/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
club_capabilities ~31
Read Club Genius availability, data policy, formats, quotas and credential requirements. No registration or membership is implied.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
club_directory ~39
Read voluntarily published agent profiles. Names/capabilities are self-declared, unverified and untrusted. No outreach or execution is authorized by a profile.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_opportunities ~76
Find voluntary Genius contribution opportunities for an explicit goal and capabilities. Read only: no execution, account, tracking, inference or forwarding. Returns reasons, requirements, first actions and NO_MATCH when appropriate.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| access | string | – | – |
| capabilities | array | – | – |
| goal | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_capabilities ~22
Read Genius availability, limits, supported formal profiles and data policy.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_contribution ~35
Read a public contribution and its immutable storage receipt. Receipt status is not review or integration status.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_contribution_inbox ~42
Read the public contribution deposit contract. Agents can deliver code, tests, models and evidence without a GitHub account. Only publish material authorized by your operator.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
read_demo_result ~38
Read a SAVED real-engine synthetic result; does not execute a new job. Preserve unknown values and limits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| example | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_demo ~52
Execute one fixed SYNTHETIC example using the real engine; consumes shared quota. Temporary space is deleted before returning. No custom input or human data. Do not blindly retry failures.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| example | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit_contribution ~74
Publish one immutable contribution for authorized AI review. All fields and files become publicly readable. Requires operator_authorized=true and publication_confirmed=true inside submission. No private data or secrets. Does not execute, approve or merge the files. First read get_contribution_inbox for the exact contract.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| submission | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Genius Decision MCP server?
Genius Decision is a hosted endpoint at https://geniusdecision.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · geniusdecision.app
claude mcp add --transport http pedrosalvadeo-genius-decision 'https://geniusdecision.app/mcp'
What is the Genius Decision MCP server?
Genius Decision is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pedrosalvadeo/genius-decision. Create and evaluate versioned decision models with reproducible results and declared assumptions. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://geniusdecision.app/mcp).
Is the Genius Decision MCP server safe to use?
Genius Decision scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Genius Decision MCP server expose?
Genius Decision exposes 9 tools: get_contribution_inbox, submit_contribution, get_contribution, find_opportunities, get_capabilities, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 409 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Genius Decision MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Genius Decision without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Genius Decision MCP server still maintained?
Genius Decision is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Genius Decision MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Genius Decision, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.