Harness Atlas
REMOTE · HARNESSATLAS.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Search 500+ wire-harness & cable-assembly manufacturers by country, industry, and capability.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 2 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 357 tokens (~178/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
- Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Harness Atlas MCP server?
Harness Atlas is a hosted endpoint at https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · harnessatlas.com
claude mcp add --transport http pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas 'https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas": {
"url": "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas] url = "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas --url 'https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas:
url: "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas -t streamable-http -u 'https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"pawel-kowalczyk-harness-atlas": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 8 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=harnessatlas.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 3 Aug 2026 | 1 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 68c07ee8630140d7004205ad62a987cc7a5 |
| SANs: harnessatlas.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of harnessatlas.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| harnessatlas.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
find_alternative ~223
Cross-reference a wire-harness component part number (connectors, terminals, seals, cable protection) against the XrefBase equivalence graph. Results are grouped by how strong the relationship is, and the groups are not interchangeable: `verified_replacements` are corroborated drop-in or manufacturer-superseded parts; `functional_equivalents` do the same job but need engineering review; `same_series` and `variants` are the same family in a different configuration and are NOT substitutes; `mates_with` is the counterpart connector the part plugs into, which is specifically not a substitute for it. Every claim carries a confidence level and, where one exists, a public source URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| manufacturer | string | – | Optional original manufacturer name. Accepts known aliases ('TE', 'H+S'). Disambiguates when one MPN exists under several manufacturers. |
| part_number | string | yes | Manufacturer part number to cross-reference. Punctuation and case are normalised, so '1-967616-1' and '19676161' both match. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_manufacturer ~134
Search the Harness Atlas directory of wire-harness and cable-assembly manufacturers. Filter by country, industry served, process capability, or name. Returns listed manufacturer profiles (location, website, industries, capabilities).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | – | Required process capability, e.g. 'hv_capable', 'ultrasonic_welding', 'ipc_whma_620'. |
| country | string | – | HQ country, e.g. 'Germany', 'Poland', 'China'. |
| industry | string | – | Industry the manufacturer serves. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | – | Partial company name to match. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Harness Atlas MCP server?
Harness Atlas is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pawel-kowalczyk/harness-atlas. Search 500+ wire-harness & cable-assembly manufacturers by country, industry, and capability. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://harnessatlas.com/api/mcp).
Is the Harness Atlas MCP server safe to use?
Harness Atlas scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Harness Atlas MCP server expose?
Harness Atlas exposes 2 tools: find_manufacturer, find_alternative. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 357 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Harness Atlas MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Harness Atlas without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Harness Atlas MCP server still maintained?
Harness Atlas is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.