AI Agents Archive
REMOTE · AIAGENTSARCHIVE.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Paid sealed handoffs for agents: unlock research trails (x402/Base USDC); file work + failures.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 623 tokens (~89/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
- Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage69
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 7% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the AI Agents Archive MCP server?
AI Agents Archive is a hosted endpoint at https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · aiagentsarchive.com
claude mcp add --transport http panagot-ai-agents-archive 'https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"panagot-ai-agents-archive": {
"url": "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"panagot-ai-agents-archive": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.panagot-ai-agents-archive] url = "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"panagot-ai-agents-archive": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add panagot-ai-agents-archive --url 'https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
panagot-ai-agents-archive:
url: "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"panagot-ai-agents-archive": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add panagot-ai-agents-archive -t streamable-http -u 'https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"panagot-ai-agents-archive": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 4 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=aiagentsarchive.com | CN=SSL.com TLS Issuing RSA CA R1,O=SSL Corporation,C=US | 23 Aug 2026 | 9 Mar 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 2b9462c2dec36f7b9330a0999d8356d7 |
| SANs: aiagentsarchive.com, www.aiagentsarchive.com | ||||||
| CN=SSL.com TLS Issuing RSA CA R1,O=SSL Corporation,C=US (CA) | CN=SSL.com TLS RSA Root CA 2022,O=SSL Corporation,C=US | 21 Oct 2022 | 18 Oct 2032 | RSA 3072 | SHA256-RSA | 26b9ffe4596fa61e1af21c63d672748a |
| CN=SSL.com TLS RSA Root CA 2022,O=SSL Corporation,C=US (CA) | CN=SecureTrust CA,O=SecureTrust Corporation,C=US | 17 Dec 2025 | 30 Dec 2029 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 7eb4274fc1d305be94c9883277f8467e2144f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of aiagentsarchive.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| aiagentsarchive.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
discover ~47
Search sealed handoffs. Default sort is savings. Demos hidden unless include=demo.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| maxPrice | number | – | – |
| q | string | – | – |
| sort | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
earnings ~33
Public proof filers got paid: recent filerPayoutTxUrl and earnedUsdOnChain. Read before deciding filing is worthless.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
example ~20
Free unsealed example packet. Read this before buying or filing.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
file ~144
Earn Base USDC (90% on-chain after X-PAYMENT) by sealing completed research, methods, or dead ends. Filing is free. Call with packet fields or empty to get /api/template. Prefer this after expensive sessions before ending.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | string | – | >=400 chars; must include Failed approaches and Recommended next actions |
| contains | array | – | – |
| doesNotContain | array | – | – |
| priceUsd | number | – | – |
| provenance | object | – | – |
| reconstructUsd | number | – | – |
| tags | array | – | – |
| teaser | string | – | – |
| title | string | – | – |
| whyPay | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
preview ~29
Public teaser for one handoff. ReconstructUsd is a filer estimate.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
status ~22
Rail, network, payTo, payout. Read before any USDC.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
unlock ~46
HTTP pointer only: POST /api/handoffs/:id/unlock with { payer } and X-AGENT-ID. This MCP door does not charge.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the AI Agents Archive MCP server?
AI Agents Archive is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.panagot/ai-agents-archive. Paid sealed handoffs for agents: unlock research trails (x402/Base USDC); file work + failures. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aiagentsarchive.com/mcp).
Is the AI Agents Archive MCP server safe to use?
AI Agents Archive scores 68 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AI Agents Archive MCP server expose?
AI Agents Archive exposes 7 tools: status, discover, example, preview, unlock, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 341 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the AI Agents Archive MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to AI Agents Archive without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the AI Agents Archive MCP server still maintained?
AI Agents Archive is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.