Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp

PYPI · SAFE-FIX-MCP

Finds real dead code and proposes a safe, test-gated branch+PR to remove it.

Available components

+16 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (18 hours ago)

Scores higher than 86% of PyPI servers

Category Version Control

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 2 of 34 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 405 tokens (~202/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 16 Oct 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 15 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 14 Oct 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 13 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 12 Oct 26 +14
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 8 Oct 26 +2

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Oct 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 3 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/safe-fix-mcp@0.1.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 34 packages
Packages resolved 34
Stale 1
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~287 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
propose_removal_pr ~157

Propose a real branch+PR removing only unused imports (single-name import lines, >= 90% vulture confidence) from a Python repository. Runs the repo's own full test suite as a safety gate before ever committing or pushing — a failure there reverts everything and nothing is committed or pushed. If `gh` isn't available or PR creation otherwise fails, the branch is still committed and pushed for real; only the PR itself needs opening manually. A human always merges — this never merges anything itself. repo_path: path to a real git repository with a clean working tree (uncommitted changes are refused, not overwritten).

NameTypeReqDescription
repo_pathstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

scan_dead_code ~130

Scan a Python repository for real dead code (vulture) and dependency issues (deptry). Read-only — never modifies anything. Returns a human-readable list of findings, or "No real candidates found." repo_path: path to the repository to scan (must contain a pyproject.toml for the dependency checks to run; dead-code scanning works regardless). min_confidence: vulture's own confidence threshold (0-100). Lower values surface more candidates but more false positives.

NameTypeReqDescription
min_confidenceinteger––
repo_pathstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp server?

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx safe-fix-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · safe-fix-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pamela-0-safe-fix-mcp -- uvx safe-fix-mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp server?

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp. Finds real dead code and proposes a safe, test-gated branch+PR to remove it. This page covers its PyPI package (safe-fix-mcp).

Is the io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 16 October 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp server expose?

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp exposes 2 tools: scan_dead_code, propose_removal_pr. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 287 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp server under?

io.github.pamela-0/safe-fix-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.