Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

rows.page

REMOTE · ROWS.PAGE

Push CSV, JSON, JSONL or Parquet from your agent and get a link a human can explore.

Available components

+3 this week 67 Trust /100

Last scanned (21 hours ago)

Scores higher than 53% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Data and Analytics

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1441 tokens (~240/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
  • Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage99
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 97% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 2 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "push" implies "publish" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://rows.page/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=rows.page CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 29 Sept 2026 28 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 f53a1f8ab15f01bd0e6abe1f8d745da5
SANs: rows.page, www.rows.page, *.www.rows.page
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of rows.page. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
page. present 64712 8 Verified
rows.page. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://rows.page/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://rows.page/mcp Served over HTTP 200
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,118 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
delete_dataset ~44

Delete a dataset you own. Its URL stops working immediately.

NameTypeReqDescription
datasetstringyesDataset id
tokenstring–Dataset token when not using an API key

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_dataset ~68

Read a dataset: meta, recent versions, findings, columns and the first 20 preview rows.

NameTypeReqDescription
datasetstringyesDataset id
tokenstring–Dataset token, needed for private datasets without an API key
versioninteger–Version number; latest when omitted

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_limits ~26

Show your plan, its caps (file size, datasets, version history) and usage.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_datasets ~38

List the datasets kept on your account, newest first. Needs an API key.

NameTypeReqDescription
cursorstring–next_cursor from the previous page

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pin_finding ~353

Pin a finding (a saved, titled view) to a dataset you own. Finding views use the rows.page query language in q: `word` or `"two words"` searches text columns; `field:value`, `field:"a b"`, `-field:value`, `field:*` (not null), `-field:*` (null), `field:foo*` (prefix); `field:>20`, `>=`, `<`, `<=`, `field:10..20`, ISO dates (`at:>2026-09-01`); dot paths for nested JSON (`payload.customer.country:NL`); `tags:urgent` means the list contains it; combine with `OR` and parentheses. A q starting with SELECT, WITH or FROM runs as SQL against the table `data`. sort is comma-separated columns, `-` for descending (`-price,name`); cols picks and orders visible columns (`a,b,c`).

NameTypeReqDescription
colsstring–Visible columns, e.g. id,price,country
datasetstringyesDataset id
notestring–Why it matters, in a sentence or two
qstring–Filter in the rows.page query language
row_countinteger–Rows matching the view, if you know it
sortstring–Sort, e.g. -price,name
sqlstring–Optional SQL against the table `data`
titlestringyesShort headline of the finding
tokenstring–Dataset token (rpt_...) when not using an API key
versioninteger–Pin to this version instead of the latest

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

push ~589

Publish rows as a rows.page dataset (or a new version of one) and get a shareable URL. Pass exactly one of csv, tsv, jsonl, json, rows or url. Up to 16 MB inline; use url for bigger files. Identical content returns unchanged: true without a new version. Re-pushes report rows_delta, columns_added/removed and a diff_url. Anonymous datasets expire after 7 days unless kept. Finding views use the rows.page query language in q: `word` or `"two words"` searches text columns; `field:value`, `field:"a b"`, `-field:value`, `field:*` (not null), `-field:*` (null), `field:foo*` (prefix); `field:>20`, `>=`, `<`, `<=`, `field:10..20`, ISO dates (`at:>2026-09-01`); dot paths for nested JSON (`payload.customer.country:NL`); `tags:urgent` means the list contains it; combine with `OR` and parentheses. A q starting with SELECT, WITH or FROM runs as SQL against the table `data`. sort is comma-separated columns, `-` for descending (`-price,name`); cols picks and orders visible columns (`a,b,c`).

NameTypeReqDescription
commitstring–Commit sha of the code that produced it
csvstring–CSV text with a header row
datasetstring–Existing dataset id to push a new version to
findingsarray––
formatstring–Format of url when it cannot be told
id_columnstring–Column that identifies a row across versions, for changed-row diffs
json––A JSON array of objects (or an object holding one), as text or as a value
jsonlstring–One JSON object per line
keystring–Stable name for upserts with an API key, e.g. nightly-orders
namestring–File name, e.g. orders.csv
rowsarray–Rows as an array of objects
runstring–Run id of the job that produced it
sourcestring–Where the data came from (URL or description)
summarystring–A few sentences for the human: what this is and what to look at
titlestring–Dataset title shown on the page
tokenstring–Dataset token (rpt_...) proving ownership of dataset
tsvstring–TSV text with a header row
urlstring–http(s) URL of a CSV, TSV, JSON, JSONL or Parquet file to fetch and publish
visibilitystring–private needs Pro or Max

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the rows.page MCP server?

rows.page is a hosted endpoint at https://rows.page/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · rows.page

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http page-rows-rows 'https://rows.page/mcp'
Common questions

What is the rows.page MCP server?

rows.page is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as page.rows/rows. Push CSV, JSON, JSONL or Parquet from your agent and get a link a human can explore. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rows.page/mcp).

Is the rows.page MCP server safe to use?

rows.page scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the rows.page MCP server expose?

rows.page exposes 6 tools: push, pin_finding, get_dataset, list_datasets, delete_dataset, get_limits. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,118 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the rows.page MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to rows.page without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the rows.page MCP server still maintained?

rows.page is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.