x402image
REMOTE · X402IMAGE.ORG · SCANNED SEP 27
x402 image tools (USDC/Base): remove_background/upscale $0.02, resize/optimize $0.005; URL in/out
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security46
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 658 tokens (~109/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage87
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 60% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "remove_background" implies "remove" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the x402image MCP server?
x402image is a hosted endpoint at https://x402image.org/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · x402image.org
claude mcp add --transport http org-x402image-image 'https://x402image.org/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"org-x402image-image": {
"url": "https://x402image.org/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"org-x402image-image": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://x402image.org/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.org-x402image-image] url = "https://x402image.org/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"org-x402image-image": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://x402image.org/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add org-x402image-image --url 'https://x402image.org/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
org-x402image-image:
url: "https://x402image.org/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"org-x402image-image": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://x402image.org/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add org-x402image-image -t streamable-http -u 'https://x402image.org/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"org-x402image-image": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://x402image.org/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 18 Sept 26 +54
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 8 Sept 26 −54
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the whole tool list to see what that exposes. security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 27 Sept 2026 · Probed https://x402image.org/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=x402image.org | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 13 Sept 2026 | 12 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 890129e2e8d9b883133f67336c59bf74 |
| SANs: x402image.org, *.x402image.org | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of x402image.org. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| org. | present | 26974 | 8 | Verified |
| x402image.org. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://x402image.org/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://x402image.org/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
optimize ~106
Convert format and/or compress an image. $0.005 per call. Input: an image via source URL. Params: format (webp|avif|jpeg|png|gif); quality (1-100, default 85 — lower is smaller). At least one of format/quality is required. Output: the optimized image as a short-lived signed URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | object | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | Public https:// URL of the source image to process. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
process ~139
Apply an ordered pipeline of image ops in a single paid call: one payment, one output. Price is the sum of the included ops’ prices — call without payment to get a 402 quote. Input: source (image URL), steps (ordered [{op, params}], e.g. [{"op":"remove_background"},{"op":"resize","params":{"width":800}}]). Call service_info for the available ops and their per-op prices. Output: the processed image as a short-lived signed URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| source | string | yes | Public https:// URL of the source image to process. |
| steps | array | yes | Ordered ops to apply in a single pass. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
remove_background ~112
Remove an image's background, isolating the subject (BiRefNet AI segmentation). $0.02 per call. Input: an image via source URL. Params: background (optional fill color for the removed area, e.g. 'white'; omit for a transparent cutout — use a PNG/WebP output to keep transparency). Output: the cut-out image as a short-lived signed URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | object | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | Public https:// URL of the source image to process. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
resize ~166
Resize or crop an image to an exact width/height. $0.005 per call. Input: an image via source URL. Params: width, height (pixels); fit (scale-down|contain|pad|squeeze|cover|crop); gravity (auto|face|left|right|top|bottom|center|entropy — focal point for cover/crop, use 'face' to keep faces); background (fill color for 'pad', e.g. 'white' or 'rgba(0,0,0,0)' for transparent). At least one of width/height is required. Output: the transformed image as a short-lived signed URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | object | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | Public https:// URL of the source image to process. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
service_info ~45
Free. Returns x402image service metadata and the list of paid image tools with their per-call USD prices. No payment or input required. Call this first to discover capabilities and pricing.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
upscale ~90
Upscale an image with AI super-resolution (ESRGAN) for sharper enlargement. $0.02 per call. Input: an image via source URL. Params: width and/or height (target pixels; at least one required). Output: the enlarged image as a short-lived signed URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | object | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | Public https:// URL of the source image to process. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the x402image MCP server?
x402image is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as org.x402image/image. x402 image tools (USDC/Base): remove_background/upscale $0.02, resize/optimize $0.005; URL in/out. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://x402image.org/mcp).
Is the x402image MCP server safe to use?
x402image scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the x402image MCP server expose?
x402image exposes 6 tools: service_info, remove_background, upscale, resize, optimize, process. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 658 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the x402image MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to x402image without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the x402image MCP server still maintained?
x402image is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 27 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.