Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Data Compliance Classifier MCP

REMOTE · DATA-COMPLIANCE-MCP-PRODUCTION.UP.RAILWAY.APP · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20

Classify data safety before storing or sharing. GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, CCPA. AI-powered.

0 this week 73 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 944 tokens (~314/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the Data Compliance Classifier MCP server?

Data Compliance Classifier MCP is a hosted endpoint at https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp 'https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp": {
      "url": "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp]
url = "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp --url 'https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp:
    url: "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ojaskord-data-compliance-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 8 Sept 26 0
    • Server version: 1.0.36 → 1.0.38 functional
  • 26 Aug 26 +2
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
    • Server version: 1.0.35 → 1.0.36 functional
  • 24 Aug 26 +1
    • Server version: 1.0.34 → 1.0.35 functional
  • 19 Aug 26 0
    • Server version: 1.0.33 → 1.0.34 functional
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.up.railway.app CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 29 Jul 2026 27 Oct 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6da79bb561da3efeb0e751ca21abd3999fe
SANs: *.up.railway.app, up.railway.app
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
railway.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app HTTPS enforced 301 https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app/
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~944 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_safety_report ~341

Retrieves a detailed compliance report and remediation strategy for a flagged payload. Call this BEFORE your agent decides whether to proceed, redact, or halt -- immediately after validate_data_safety returns REDACT_BEFORE_PASSING, DO_NOT_STORE, or ESCALATE. Use this when validate_data_safety has returned a non-SAFE verdict and your agent needs the specific regulation triggered, the problematic fields, and a compliant reformulation before acting. Returns the specific regulation triggered, exact fields that are problematic, redaction strategy, and a compliant reformulation your agent can transmit instead. Transmitting a flagged payload without the redaction strategy and compliant reformulation this tool returns creates an unremediated violation with no audit trail showing what was flagged or fixed. Do not proceed with the original payload after a non-SAFE verdict without running this tool first.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextstringWhat will be done with this data. Used to improve verdict accuracy.
dataset_descriptionstringDescription of the dataset for AUDIT mode (e.g. "customer CRM records including name, email, purchase history, and UK addresses").
jurisdictionstringJurisdiction override for REPORT mode (e.g. "EU", "US", "UK"). Optional.
modestringyesREPORT: get redaction strategy and compliant reformulation for a flagged payload. BATCH: classify up to 50 payloads. AUDIT: generate compliance summary report.
payloadstringThe flagged payload to analyse. Required for REPORT mode.
payloadsarrayArray of data payloads to classify. Required for BATCH mode. Maximum 50.
NameTypeReqDescription
_disclaimerstringyes
checked_atstringyes
messagestring
modestring
patterns_detectedarray
statusstringPresent on the free-tier REPORT preview path
upgrade_urlstring

No examples provided.

validate_data_safety ~388

Validates a data payload against GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and other frameworks. Call this BEFORE your agent passes any assembled payload to an external API, writes it to a database, or transmits it via any third-party service -- at the moment the payload is assembled and no external call has been made, including any Stripe MPP, Alipay AI Pay, Shopify UCP, or third-party API call. Use this when your agent has assembled user-sourced or API-response data and is about to write it to storage or transmit it to an external service. Returns SAFE_TO_PROCESS / REDACT_BEFORE_PASSING / DO_NOT_STORE / ESCALATE verdict against GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, CCPA, and 7 other frameworks. Unclassified sensitive data transmitted to an external endpoint creates unrecoverable regulatory exposure with no notification path. Call get_safety_report next if verdict is not SAFE_TO_PROCESS. Returns machine-ready verdict, no further analysis needed.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextstringWhat your agent is about to do with this data (e.g. "write to database", "send to third-party API", "log to file", "pass to email tool"). Improves verdict accuracy.
data_origin_ipstringIP address of the data subject or data source. Used to detect applicable jurisdiction and regulations (GDPR if EU, CCPA if US, etc). Optional but improves regulatory accuracy.
jurisdictionstringOverride jurisdiction if known (e.g. "EU", "US", "UK", "CA", "AU"). Use if data_origin_ip is unavailable but jurisdiction is known.
payloadstringyesThe data payload to classify. Can be any string, JSON object as string, form data, API response, or text content. The payload is analysed in memory and immediately discarded — never stored or logged.
NameTypeReqDescription
_disclaimerstringyes
analysis_typestring
applicable_regulationsarray
checked_atstringyes
confidencestring
credential_checkobject|null
detected_categoriesarray
jurisdiction_detectedstring|null
patterns_detectedarray
reasoningstringPaid tier only -- gated to _reasoning_gated on free tier
recommended_actionstring
redaction_targetsarray
sensitivity_levelstringyes
source_urlstring
verdictstringyes

No examples provided.

validate_data_safety_lite ~215

Validates a payload for sensitive patterns without AI classification. Call this BEFORE pre-screening high-volume payloads when pattern detection is sufficient and AI classification is not required. Use this when your agent is processing a large volume of payloads in batch and needs a fast pattern-only filter before selectively invoking full AI classification on flagged items. Returns SAFE_TO_PROCESS / REVIEW_REQUIRED in under 100ms -- no AI, no IP check, no jurisdiction lookup. Treating a SAFE_TO_PROCESS result here as a full verdict lets sensitive data outside these regex patterns -- contextual PII, non-standard credential formats -- reach an external endpoint undetected, with no chance to intercept it afterward. Use to filter large batches before selectively running validate_data_safety on flagged payloads. Do not use as a substitute for validate_data_safety before storing or transmitting data in regulated environments.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextstringOptional: what your agent plans to do with this data.
payloadstringyesThe data payload to screen for sensitive patterns.
NameTypeReqDescription
_disclaimerstringyes
agent_actionstringyes
analysis_typestring
checked_atstringyes
patterns_detectedarray
sensitivity_levelstring
verdictstringyes

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Data Compliance Classifier MCP server?

Data Compliance Classifier MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.OjasKord/data-compliance-mcp. Classify data safety before storing or sharing. GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, CCPA. AI-powered. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://data-compliance-mcp-production.up.railway.app).

Is the Data Compliance Classifier MCP server safe to use?

Data Compliance Classifier MCP scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Data Compliance Classifier MCP server expose?

Data Compliance Classifier MCP exposes 3 tools: validate_data_safety, get_safety_report, validate_data_safety_lite. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 944 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Data Compliance Classifier MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Data Compliance Classifier MCP without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Data Compliance Classifier MCP server still maintained?

Data Compliance Classifier MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.