LabelChop MCP Server
REMOTE · LABELCHOP.COM · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20
AI tools for MyPost A4 labels, 4x6 thermal printers and LabelChop resources.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 3 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 305 tokens (~101/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the LabelChop MCP Server server?
LabelChop MCP Server is a hosted endpoint at https://labelchop.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · labelchop.com
claude mcp add --transport http northy9-labelchop-mcp-server 'https://labelchop.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"northy9-labelchop-mcp-server": {
"url": "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"northy9-labelchop-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.northy9-labelchop-mcp-server] url = "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"northy9-labelchop-mcp-server": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add northy9-labelchop-mcp-server --url 'https://labelchop.com/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
northy9-labelchop-mcp-server:
url: "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"northy9-labelchop-mcp-server": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add northy9-labelchop-mcp-server -t streamable-http -u 'https://labelchop.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"northy9-labelchop-mcp-server": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://labelchop.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 26 Aug 26 +2
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 24 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Jul 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://labelchop.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=labelchop.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 16 Sept 2026 | 15 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6788a2d5ea7daf0bdde0a2a3652557d652e |
| SANs: labelchop.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of labelchop.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| labelchop.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://labelchop.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://labelchop.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://labelchop.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
diagnose_shipping_label_workflow ~164
Diagnose an ecommerce seller shipping-label workflow and recommend whether to use LabelChop or the free A4-to-4x6 converter.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | – | Seller country, e.g. Australia |
| platform | string | – | Shipping or ecommerce platform, e.g. MyPost Business, eBay, Shopify, Etsy, Sendle |
| printer | string | – | Thermal printer model, e.g. Zebra ZD420, Dymo 4XL, Brother QL-1110NWB, Munbyn |
| problem | string | – | The current problem, e.g. labels print too small, A4 labels, barcode will not scan, manual cropping |
| volumePerWeek | number | – | Approximate number of shipping labels printed per week |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_labelchop_resources ~64
Find the best LabelChop resource links for A4 shipping labels, 4x6 thermal printing, MyPost Business, Australia Post, eBay, Shopify, Etsy, or label troubleshooting.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | What the user is trying to solve |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
recommend_label_printing_setup ~77
Recommend a practical 4x6 thermal-label printing setup for Australian ecommerce sellers.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| labelSize | string | – | Label stock size |
| platform | string | – | Shipping or ecommerce platform |
| printerModel | string | – | Thermal printer model |
| wantsAutomation | boolean | – | Whether the seller wants automatic printing after downloading labels |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the LabelChop MCP Server server?
LabelChop MCP Server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Northy9/labelchop-mcp-server. AI tools for MyPost A4 labels, 4x6 thermal printers and LabelChop resources. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://labelchop.com/api/mcp).
Is the LabelChop MCP Server server safe to use?
LabelChop MCP Server scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the LabelChop MCP Server server expose?
LabelChop MCP Server exposes 3 tools: diagnose_shipping_label_workflow, recommend_label_printing_setup, find_labelchop_resources. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 305 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the LabelChop MCP Server server require authentication?
No. We connected to LabelChop MCP Server without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the LabelChop MCP Server server still maintained?
LabelChop MCP Server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.